Literature DB >> 30483958

Safety of regadenoson positron emission tomography stress testing in orthotopic heart transplant patients.

John J Lazarus1, Ashraf Saleh2, Michael Ghannam2, Keith Aaronson2, Monica Colvin2, Frank Pagani2, Todd Koelling2, James R Corbett2, Richard L Weinberg2, Venkatesh L Murthy2, Matthew C Konerman2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine the safety of regadenoson (REG) stress testing in patients who have undergone orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT).
BACKGROUND: Routine screening for cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is necessary after OHT. Adenosine stress is contraindicated after heart transplantation due to supersensitivity in denervated hearts. Safety of regadenoson stress following OHT has not been well studied.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from OHT patients (N = 123) who were referred to REG stress testing. Medical records were reviewed to determine hemodynamic and ECG response to regadenoson and to identify adverse reactions.
RESULTS: No serious adverse events occurred. No life-threatening arrhythmias or hemodynamic changes occurred. Common side-effects related to regadenoson were observed, dyspnea being the most frequent (66.7%). On average the heart rate rose from 82.8 ± 12 to 95.7 ± 13.4 bpm (P < 0.001), systolic blood pressure decreased from 138.7 ± 20.9 to 115.9 ± 23.9 mmHg (P < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure decreased from 103.5 ± 14.1 to 84.72 ± 15.90 mmHg (P < 0.001) during stress protocol. There was no sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or second-or third-degree atrioventricular block.
CONCLUSION: Regadenoson stress testing appears to be well tolerated and safe in OHT patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Positron emission tomography; heart failure; pharmacologic stress cardiac transplantation; regadenoson; safety

Year:  2018        PMID: 30483958      PMCID: PMC6536350          DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-01466-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  15 in total

1.  Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve.

Authors:  Venkatesh L Murthy; Masanao Naya; Courtney R Foster; Jon Hainer; Mariya Gaber; Gilda Di Carli; Ron Blankstein; Sharmila Dorbala; Arkadiusz Sitek; Michael J Pencina; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Regadenoson, a selective A2A adenosine receptor agonist, causes dose-dependent increases in coronary blood flow velocity in humans.

Authors:  Hsiao D Lieu; John C Shryock; Gregory O von Mering; Toufigh Gordi; Brent Blackburn; Ann W Olmsted; Luiz Belardinelli; Richard A Kerensky
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  A population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of regadenoson, an adenosine A2A-receptor agonist, in healthy male volunteers.

Authors:  Toufigh Gordi; Paul Frohna; Hai-Ling Sun; Andrew Wolff; Luiz Belardinelli; Hsiao Lieu
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Coronary intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Sripal Bangalore; Deepak L Bhatt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Long-term outcome following heart transplantation: current perspective.

Authors:  Markus J Wilhelm
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Regadenoson is a safe and well-tolerated pharmacological stress agent for myocardial perfusion imaging in post-heart transplant patients.

Authors:  João L Cavalcante; Joaquim Barboza; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Safety of adenosine pharmacologic stress myocardial perfusion imaging in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients: a single center experience of 102 transplant patients.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Muhammad Arida; Enrique Garcia-Sayan; Chafik Assal; Gino Tapia Zegarra; Barbara Czerska; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial.

Authors:  Ami E Iskandrian; Timothy M Bateman; Luiz Belardinelli; Brent Blackburn; Manuel D Cerqueira; Robert C Hendel; Hsiao Lieu; John J Mahmarian; Ann Olmsted; S Richard Underwood; João Vitola; Whedy Wang
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

9.  Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of "angiographically silent" intimal thickening.

Authors:  F G St Goar; F J Pinto; E L Alderman; H A Valantine; J S Schroeder; S Z Gao; E B Stinson; R L Popp
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Electrophysiological effects of adenosine in the transplanted human heart. Evidence of supersensitivity.

Authors:  K A Ellenbogen; M D Thames; J P DiMarco; H Sheehan; B B Lerman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.