Literature DB >> 25182152

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy.

Rune Lykke1, Jan Blaakær, Bent Ottesen, Helga Gimbel.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to describe the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery after hysterectomy from 1977 to 2009, the time interval from hysterectomy to POP surgery, and age characteristics of women undergoing POP surgery after hysterectomy and to estimate the risk of undergoing POP surgery after hysterectomy.
METHODS: The study was a population-based registry study. Patient data from 154,882 women hysterectomized for benign conditions in the period from 1977 to 2009 were extracted from the Danish National Patient Registry. Patients were followed up from hysterectomy to POP surgery, death/emigration, or end of study period. An estimate of the hazard of undergoing POP surgery following hysterectomy was calculated. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier product limit method.
RESULTS: The frequency of POP surgery on hysterectomized women was high the first 2 years of the follow-up period with almost 800 women operated yearly. More than one third (n = 2,872) of all women operated for POP were operated less than 5 years after the hysterectomy with a median of 8.6 years. The cumulated incidence of POP surgery after hysterectomy with follow-up of up to 32 years was 12 %; 50 % (n = 5,451) of all POP surgeries were in the posterior compartment. The mean age of women undergoing a first POP surgery after hysterectomy was 60 years.
CONCLUSIONS: POP after hysterectomy occurs as a long-term complication of hysterectomy; 12 % of hysterectomized women were operated for POP. They were operated at younger age than non-hysterectomized women and half the POP operations were performed in the posterior compartment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25182152     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-014-2490-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  15 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to understanding Kaplan-Meier curves.

Authors:  Jason T Rich; J Gail Neely; Randal C Paniello; Courtney C J Voelker; Brian Nussenbaum; Eric W Wang
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Christian Falconer; Sven Cnattingius; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Patrick Dällenbach; Isabelle Kaelin-Gambirasio; Sandrine Jacob; Jean-Bernard Dubuisson; Michel Boulvain
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-09-05

4.  Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence.

Authors:  A L Olsen; V J Smith; J O Bergstrom; J C Colling; A L Clark
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Hysterectomy in Denmark 1977-2011: changes in rate, indications, and hospitalization.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.435

6.  [The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control].

Authors:  Øjvind Lidegaard; Mette Schou Hammerum
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2002-09-16

7.  Risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse surgery in postmenopausal hysterectomized women.

Authors:  Catharina Forsgren; Jan Zetterström; Annika López; Daniel Altman
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  [Validity of the registration and reporting of vaginal prolapse surgery].

Authors:  Marianne Ottesen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2009-02-02

9.  Risk factors for pelvic floor repair after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Roberta E Blandon; Adil E Bharucha; L Joseph Melton; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; John B Gebhart
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 10.  Pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse and health-related quality of life: a review.

Authors:  Babet H C Lamers; Bart M W Broekman; Alfredo L Milani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.894

View more
  9 in total

1.  The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Treatment of vaginal vault prolapse in The Netherlands: a clinical practice survey.

Authors:  Carolien K M Vermeulen; Anne Lotte W M Coolen; Wilbert A Spaans; Jan Paul W R Roovers; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy with benign indication: a national cohort study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Huei-Kai Huang; Dah-Ching Ding
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Vaginal vault suspension during hysterectomy for benign indications: a prospective register study of agreement on terminology and surgical procedure.

Authors:  Lisbeth Bonde; Mette Calundann Noer; Lars Alling Møller; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Incidence of pelvic organ prolapse repair subsequent to hysterectomy: a comparison between radical hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Age at hysterectomy as a predictor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.

Authors:  Renée J Detollenaere; Jan den Boon; Jelle Stekelenburg; Joanna IntHout; Mark E Vierhout; Kirsten B Kluivers; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-07-23

8.  Effect of Psychological Intervention on Pelvic Floor Function and Psychological Outcomes After Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Meilian Xie; Xin Huang; Shan Zhao; Yingtong Chen; Xiuqun Zeng
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 9.  The Danish Hysterectomy and Hysteroscopy Database.

Authors:  Märta Fink Topsoee; Else Helene Ibfelt; Annette Settnes
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.790

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.