Literature DB >> 20723767

A practical guide to understanding Kaplan-Meier curves.

Jason T Rich1, J Gail Neely, Randal C Paniello, Courtney C J Voelker, Brian Nussenbaum, Eric W Wang.   

Abstract

In 1958, Edward L. Kaplan and Paul Meier collaborated to publish a seminal paper on how to deal with incomplete observations. Subsequently, the Kaplan-Meier curves and estimates of survival data have become a familiar way of dealing with differing survival times (times-to-event), especially when not all the subjects continue in the study. "Survival" times need not relate to actual survival with death being the event; the "event" may be any event of interest. Kaplan-Meier analyses are also used in nonmedical disciplines. The purpose of this article is to explain how Kaplan-Meier curves are generated and analyzed. Throughout this article, we will discuss Kaplan-Meier estimates in the context of "survival" before the event of interest. Two small groups of hypothetical data are used as examples in order for the reader to clearly see how the process works. These examples also illustrate the crucially important point that comparative analysis depends upon the whole curve and not upon isolated points. Copyright 2010 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723767      PMCID: PMC3932959          DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2010.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  2 in total

1.  Cautionary note regarding the use of CIs obtained from Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

Authors:  Rickey E Carter; Peng Huang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Survival of patients with stage I lung cancer detected on CT screening.

Authors:  Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz; Daniel M Libby; Mark W Pasmantier; James P Smith; Olli S Miettinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

  2 in total
  154 in total

Review 1.  [Kaplan-Meier analysis in urological practice].

Authors:  M Rink; L A Kluth; S F Shariat; M Fisch; R Dahlem; P Dahm
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Post-surgical depressive symptoms and long-term survival in non-metastatic breast cancer patients at 11-year follow-up.

Authors:  Michael H Antoni; Jamie M Jacobs; Laura C Bouchard; Suzanne C Lechner; Devika R Jutagir; Lisa M Gudenkauf; Bonnie B Blomberg; Stefan Glück; Charles S Carver
Journal:  Gen Hosp Psychiatry       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.238

3.  Tapering off and returning to buprenorphine maintenance in a primary care Office Based Addiction Treatment (OBAT) program.

Authors:  Zoe M Weinstein; Gabriela Gryczynski; Debbie M Cheng; Emily Quinn; David Hui; Hyunjoong W Kim; Colleen Labelle; Jeffrey H Samet
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.492

4.  Indicators of retention in remote digital health studies: a cross-study evaluation of 100,000 participants.

Authors:  Abhishek Pratap; Elias Chaibub Neto; Phil Snyder; Carl Stepnowsky; Noémie Elhadad; Daniel Grant; Matthew H Mohebbi; Sean Mooney; Christine Suver; John Wilbanks; Lara Mangravite; Patrick J Heagerty; Pat Areán; Larsson Omberg
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-02-17

5.  More patients should undergo surgery after sigmoid volvulus.

Authors:  Anne Kathrine Wewer Ifversen; Daniel Willy Kjaer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Current and Evolving Methods to Visualize Biological Data in Cancer Research.

Authors:  Puey Ling Chia; Craig Gedye; Paul C Boutros; Paul Wheatley-Price; Thomas John
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  An analysis of factors related to the tail-like pattern of myxofibrosarcoma seen on MRI.

Authors:  Kazutaka Kikuta; Daisuke Kubota; Akihiko Yoshida; Hideo Morioka; Yoshiaki Toyama; Hirokazu Chuuman; Akira Kawai
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The behavioral origins of novelty: did increased aggression lead to scale-eating in pupfishes?

Authors:  Michelle E St John; Joseph A McGirr; Christopher H Martin
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  The Use of Evidence-Based, Problem-Oriented Templates as a Clinical Decision Support in an Inpatient Electronic Health Record System.

Authors:  Raj Mehta; Nila S Radhakrishnan; Carrie D Warring; Ankur Jain; Jorge Fuentes; Angela Dolganiuc; Laura S Lourdes; John Busigin; Robert R Leverence
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.342

10.  Reproductive and genotoxic effects in zebrafish after chronic exposure to methyl methanesulfonate in a multigeneration study.

Authors:  Christopher Faßbender; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.