Literature DB >> 26564221

Age at hysterectomy as a predictor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Rune Lykke1,2, Jan Blaakær3, Bent Ottesen4, Helga Gimbel5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between patient age at the time of hysterectomy and subsequent pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery.
METHODS: We gathered data on all benign hysterectomies and POP surgeries performed in Denmark on Danish women from 1977 to 2009 from the Danish National Patient Registry. The cohort consisted of 154,882 hysterectomized women, who were followed up for up to 32 years. Survival analysis for each age group at hysterectomy was performed using Kaplan-Meier product limit methods.
RESULTS: For all hysterectomized women, we found that low age at hysterectomy yielded a lower risk of subsequent POP surgery than did hysterectomy at an older age. This difference diminished after stratification by indication; all non-POP hysterectomies had a low cumulative incidence at 8-11 % at the end of the follow-up period. For all women hysterectomized, the predominant compartment for POP surgery was the posterior. Women hysterectomized when aged over 66 years had a higher proportion of POP surgery in the apical compartment than in the other age groups (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that age at hysterectomy only marginally influences the risk of subsequent POP surgery for women hysterectomized for indications other than POP. If POP is the indication for hysterectomy, the risk of undergoing subsequent POP surgery increases substantially.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hysterectomy; Kaplan–Meier; Pelvic organ prolapse; Urogynecology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26564221     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-015-2881-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  13 in total

1.  Pelvic organ prolapse surgery following hysterectomy on benign indications.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Christian Falconer; Sven Cnattingius; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Changes in connective tissue in patients with pelvic organ prolapse--a review of the current literature.

Authors:  M H Kerkhof; L Hendriks; H A M Brölmann
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-10-15

3.  The indication for hysterectomy as a risk factor for subsequent pelvic organ prolapse repair.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery among Danish women hysterectomized for benign conditions: age at hysterectomy, age at subsequent POP operation, and risk of POP after hysterectomy.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Vaginal hysterectomy and risk of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence surgery.

Authors:  Catharina Forsgren; Cecilia Lundholm; Anna L V Johansson; Sven Cnattingius; Jan Zetterström; Daniel Altman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence, do they share the same risk factors?

Authors:  Núria L Rodríguez-Mias; Eva Martínez-Franco; Jaume Aguado; Emilia Sánchez; Lluis Amat-Tardiu
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Hysterectomy in Denmark 1977-2011: changes in rate, indications, and hospitalization.

Authors:  Rune Lykke; Jan Blaakær; Bent Ottesen; Helga Gimbel
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  [The National Patient Registry as a tool for continuous production and quality control].

Authors:  Øjvind Lidegaard; Mette Schou Hammerum
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2002-09-16

9.  Risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse surgery in postmenopausal hysterectomized women.

Authors:  Catharina Forsgren; Jan Zetterström; Annika López; Daniel Altman
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.953

10.  [Validity of the registration and reporting of vaginal prolapse surgery].

Authors:  Marianne Ottesen
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2009-02-02
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the Efficiency of Posterior Intravaginal Sling (PIVS) Procedure in Older and Younger Groups.

Authors:  Tolgay Tuyan Ilhan; Akin Sivaslioglu; Türkan Ilhan; Mustafa Gazi Uçar; İsmail Dolen
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-07-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.