Nancy Puzziferri1, Thomas B Roshek2, Helen G Mayo3, Ryan Gallagher2, Steven H Belle4, Edward H Livingston5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas2Department of Surgery, North Texas Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Dallas. 2. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas. 3. University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Library, Dallas. 4. Departments of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas2Department of Surgery, North Texas Veterans Administration Healthcare System, Dallas5Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas-Arlington, Arlington6Deputy Edito.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Bariatric surgery is an accepted treatment for obesity. Despite extensive literature, few studies report long-term follow-up in cohorts with adequate retention rates. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of evidence and treatment effectiveness 2 years after bariatric procedures for weight loss, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia in severely obese adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched from 1946 through May 15, 2014. Search terms included bariatric surgery, individual bariatric procedures, and obesity. Studies were included if they described outcomes for gastric bypass, gastric band, or sleeve gastrectomy performed on patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater, had more than 2 years of outcome information, and had follow-up measures for at least 80% of the initial cohort. Two investigators reviewed each study and a third resolved study inclusion disagreements. FINDINGS: Of 7371 clinical studies reviewed, 29 studies (0.4%, 7971 patients) met inclusion criteria. All gastric bypass studies (6 prospective cohorts, 5 retrospective cohorts) and sleeve gastrectomy studies (2 retrospective cohorts) had 95% confidence intervals for the reported mean, median, or both exceeding 50% excess weight loss. This amount of excess weight loss occurred in 31% of gastric band studies (9 prospective cohorts, 5 retrospective cohorts). The mean sample-size-weighted percentage of excess weight loss for gastric bypass was 65.7% (n = 3544) vs 45.0% (n = 4109) for gastric band. Nine studies measured comorbidity improvement. For type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin <6.5% without medication), sample-size-weighted remission rates were 66.7% for gastric bypass (n = 428) and 28.6% for gastric band (n = 96). For hypertension (blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg without medication), remission rates were 38.2% for gastric bypass ( n = 808) and 17.4% for gastric band (n = 247). For hyperlipidemia (cholesterol <200 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein >40 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein <160 mg/dL, and triglycerides <200 mg/dL), remission rates were 60.4% for gastric bypass (n = 477) and 22.7% for gastric band (n = 97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Very few bariatric surgery studies report long-term results with sufficient patient follow-up to minimize biased results. Gastric bypass has better outcomes than gastric band procedures for long-term weight loss, type 2 diabetes control and remission, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Insufficient evidence exists regarding long-term outcomes for gastric sleeve resections.
IMPORTANCE: Bariatric surgery is an accepted treatment for obesity. Despite extensive literature, few studies report long-term follow-up in cohorts with adequate retention rates. OBJECTIVE: To assess the quality of evidence and treatment effectiveness 2 years after bariatric procedures for weight loss, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia in severely obese adults. EVIDENCE REVIEW: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched from 1946 through May 15, 2014. Search terms included bariatric surgery, individual bariatric procedures, and obesity. Studies were included if they described outcomes for gastric bypass, gastric band, or sleeve gastrectomy performed on patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater, had more than 2 years of outcome information, and had follow-up measures for at least 80% of the initial cohort. Two investigators reviewed each study and a third resolved study inclusion disagreements. FINDINGS: Of 7371 clinical studies reviewed, 29 studies (0.4%, 7971 patients) met inclusion criteria. All gastric bypass studies (6 prospective cohorts, 5 retrospective cohorts) and sleeve gastrectomy studies (2 retrospective cohorts) had 95% confidence intervals for the reported mean, median, or both exceeding 50% excess weight loss. This amount of excess weight loss occurred in 31% of gastric band studies (9 prospective cohorts, 5 retrospective cohorts). The mean sample-size-weighted percentage of excess weight loss for gastric bypass was 65.7% (n = 3544) vs 45.0% (n = 4109) for gastric band. Nine studies measured comorbidity improvement. For type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin <6.5% without medication), sample-size-weighted remission rates were 66.7% for gastric bypass (n = 428) and 28.6% for gastric band (n = 96). For hypertension (blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg without medication), remission rates were 38.2% for gastric bypass ( n = 808) and 17.4% for gastric band (n = 247). For hyperlipidemia (cholesterol <200 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein >40 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein <160 mg/dL, and triglycerides <200 mg/dL), remission rates were 60.4% for gastric bypass (n = 477) and 22.7% for gastric band (n = 97). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Very few bariatric surgery studies report long-term results with sufficient patient follow-up to minimize biased results. Gastric bypass has better outcomes than gastric band procedures for long-term weight loss, type 2 diabetes control and remission, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Insufficient evidence exists regarding long-term outcomes for gastric sleeve resections.
Authors: Geltrude Mingrone; Simona Panunzi; Andrea De Gaetano; Caterina Guidone; Amerigo Iaconelli; Laura Leccesi; Giuseppe Nanni; Alfons Pomp; Marco Castagneto; Giovanni Ghirlanda; Francesco Rubino Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-03-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Caiazzo; L Arnalsteen; M Pigeyre; G Dezfoulian; H Verkindt; J Kirkby-Bott; P Mathurin; P Fontaine; M Romon; F Pattou Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Matthew M Hutter; Bruce D Schirmer; Daniel B Jones; Clifford Y Ko; Mark E Cohen; Ryan P Merkow; Ninh T Nguyen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ted D Adams; Lance E Davidson; Sheldon E Litwin; Ronette L Kolotkin; Michael J LaMonte; Robert C Pendleton; Michael B Strong; Russell Vinik; Nathan A Wanner; Paul N Hopkins; Richard E Gress; James M Walker; Tom V Cloward; R Tom Nuttall; Ahmad Hammoud; Jessica L J Greenwood; Ross D Crosby; Rodrick McKinlay; Steven C Simper; Sherman C Smith; Steven C Hunt Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Torgeir T Søvik; Erlend T Aasheim; Osama Taha; My Engström; Morten W Fagerland; Sofia Björkman; Jon Kristinsson; Kare I Birkeland; Tom Mala; Torsten Olbers Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-09-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anita P Courcoulas; Nicholas J Christian; Steven H Belle; Paul D Berk; David R Flum; Luis Garcia; Mary Horlick; Melissa A Kalarchian; Wendy C King; James E Mitchell; Emma J Patterson; John R Pender; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Richard C Thirlby; Susan Z Yanovski; Bruce M Wolfe Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anita P Courcoulas; Wendy C King; Steven H Belle; Paul Berk; David R Flum; Luis Garcia; William Gourash; Mary Horlick; James E Mitchell; Alfons Pomp; Walter J Pories; Jonathan Q Purnell; Ashima Singh; Konstantinos Spaniolas; Richard Thirlby; Bruce M Wolfe; Susan Z Yanovski Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Brian F Zamarron; Cara E Porsche; Danny Luan; Hannah R Lucas; Taleen A Mergian; Gabriel Martinez-Santibanez; Kae Won Cho; Jennifer L DelProposto; Lynn M Geletka; Lindsey A Muir; Kanakadurga Singer; Carey N Lumeng Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-04-13 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Matthew L Maciejewski; David E Arterburn; Lynn Van Scoyoc; Valerie A Smith; William S Yancy; Hollis J Weidenbacher; Edward H Livingston; Maren K Olsen Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 14.766