Literature DB >> 23235396

Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: fifteen-year follow-up of adjustable gastric banding and a systematic review of the bariatric surgical literature.

Paul E O'Brien1, Leah MacDonald, Margaret Anderson, Leah Brennan, Wendy A Brown.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the long-term outcomes after laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and compare these with the published literature on bariatric surgery.
BACKGROUND: Because obesity is a chronic disease, any proposed obesity treatment should be expected to demonstrate long-term durability to be considered effective. Yet for bariatric surgery, few long-term weight loss data are available. We report our 15-year follow-up data after LAGB and provide a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature for weight loss at 10 years or more after bariatric surgical procedures.
METHODS: We performed a prospective longitudinal cohort study of LAGB patients using an electronic database system (LapBase) to track progress, measure weight changes, and document revisional procedures. The evolution of the LAGB procedure was recognized, and revisional rates for 3 separate periods between September 1994 and December 2011 were described. In addition, we performed a systematic review of the peer-reviewed published literature collecting all reports that included weight loss data at or beyond 10 years.
RESULTS: A total of 3227 patients, with a mean age of 47 years and a mean body mass index of 43.8 kg/m, were treated by laparoscopic adjustable gastric band placement between September 1994 and December 2011. Seven hundred fourteen patients had completed at least 10 years of follow-up. Follow-up was intact in 81% of patients overall and 78% of those beyond 10 years. There was no perioperative mortality for the primary placement or for any revisional procedures. There was 47.1% of excess weight loss (% EWL) at 15 years [n = 54; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 8.3] and 62% EWL at 16 years (n = 14; 95% CI = 13.6). There was a mean of 47.0% EWL (n = 714; 95% CI = 1.3) for all patients who were at or beyond 10 years follow-up. Revisional procedures were performed for proximal enlargement (26%), erosion (3.4%), and port and tubing problems (21%). The band was explanted in 5.6%. The need for revision decreased as the technique evolved, with 40% revision rate for proximal gastric enlargements in the first 10 years, reducing to 6.4% in the past 5 years. The revision group showed a similar weight loss to the overall group beyond 10 years. The systematic review of all bariatric procedures with 10 or more years of follow-up showed greater than 50% EWL for all current procedures. The weighted mean at maximum follow-up for LAGB was 54.2% EWL and for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was 54.0% EWL.
CONCLUSIONS: The LAGB study from 1 center demonstrates a durable weight loss with 47% EWL maintained to 15 years. This weight loss occurred regardless of whether any revisional procedures were needed. A systematic review shows substantial and similar long-term weight losses for LAGB and other bariatric procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23235396     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b6c02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  182 in total

1.  Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients have an increased lifetime risk of repeat operations when compared to laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy patients.

Authors:  Yulia Zak; Emil Petrusa; Denise W Gee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Complications and Surveillance After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Seth J Concors; Brett L Ecker; Richard Maduka; Alyssa Furukawa; Steven E Raper; Daniel D Dempsey; Noel N Williams; Kristoffel R Dumon
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass, a Novel Bariatric Surgery, Versus Other Familiar Methods: Results of a 6-Month Follow-up-a Comparative Study.

Authors:  Masoud Sayadishahraki; Mohammad Taghi Rezaei; Mohsen Mahmoudieh; Behrouz Keleydari; Shahab Shahabi; Mostafa Allami
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Reoperations After Bariatric Surgery in 26 Years of Follow-up of the Swedish Obese Subjects Study.

Authors:  Stephan Hjorth; Ingmar Näslund; Johanna C Andersson-Assarsson; Per-Arne Svensson; Peter Jacobson; Markku Peltonen; Lena M S Carlsson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Do Male Patients Benefit from Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding More than Female Patients? A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Maor Lewis; Uri Netz; Solly Mizrahi; Eliezer Avinoah; Doron Gal; Zvi H Perry
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Slippage-a Significant Problem Following Gastric Banding-a Single Centre Experience.

Authors:  Tomasz Szewczyk; Przemyslaw Janczak; Natalia Jezierska; Piotr Jurałowicz
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding: Weight Loss and Removal Rate. A Single Center Experience on 301 Patients with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 years.

Authors:  Sergio Carandina; Malek Tabbara; Leila Galiay; Claude Polliand; Daniel Azoulay; Christophe Barrat; Andrea Lazzati
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Is the Sleeve Gastrectomy Always a Better Procedure? Five-Year Results from a Retrospective Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Antonio Vitiello; Vincenzo Pilone; Luca Ferraro; Pietro Forestieri
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Intermittent gastric prolapse after adjustable gastric banding is a potential cause of band intolerance: clinical and diagnostic findings from eight patients.

Authors:  Anthony D Clough; Patrick M Moore
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Conversion of Adjustable Gastric Banding to Adjustable Banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Should We Leave the Band in Place?

Authors:  Frederik Pdm Lecot; Evert-Jan G Boerma; Rochelle Sigterman-Nelissen; Berry Meesters; Sofie Fransen; Jan Willem Greve
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.