Literature DB >> 25181412

High-content positional biosensor screening assay for compounds to prevent or disrupt androgen receptor and transcriptional intermediary factor 2 protein-protein interactions.

Yun Hua1, Tong Ying Shun, Christopher J Strock, Paul A Johnston.   

Abstract

The androgen receptor-transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (AR-TIF2) positional protein-protein interaction (PPI) biosensor assay described herein combines physiologically relevant cell-based assays with the specificity of binding assays by incorporating structural information of AR and TIF2 functional domains along with intracellular targeting sequences and fluorescent reporters. Expression of the AR-red fluorescent protein (RFP) "prey" and TIF2-green fluorescent protein (GFP) "bait" components of the biosensor was directed by recombinant adenovirus constructs that expressed the ligand binding and activation function 2 surface domains of AR fused to RFP with nuclear localization and nuclear export sequences, and three α-helical LXXLL motifs from TIF2 fused to GFP and an HIV Rev nucleolar targeting sequence. In unstimulated cells, AR-RFP was localized predominantly to the cytoplasm and TIF2-GFP was localized to nucleoli. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) treatment induced AR-RFP translocation into the nucleus where the PPIs between AR and TIF2 resulted in the colocalization of both biosensors within the nucleolus. We adapted the translocation enhanced image analysis module to quantify the colocalization of the AR-RFP and TIF2-GFP biosensors in images acquired on the ImageXpress platform. DHT induced a concentration-dependent AR-TIF2 colocalization and produced a characteristic condensed punctate AR-RFP PPI nucleolar distribution pattern. The heat-shock protein 90 inhibitor 17-N-allylamino-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) and antiandrogens flutamide and bicalutamide inhibited DHT-induced AR-TIF2 PPI formation with 50% inhibition concentrations (IC50s) of 88.5±12.5 nM, 7.6±2.4 μM, and 1.6±0.4 μM, respectively. Images of the AR-RFP distribution phenotype allowed us to distinguish between 17-AAG and flutamide, which prevented AR translocation, and bicalutamide, which blocked AR-TIF2 PPIs. We screened the Library of Pharmacologically Active Compounds (LOPAC) set for compounds that inhibited AR-TIF2 PPI formation or disrupted preexisting complexes. Eleven modulators of steroid family nuclear receptors (NRs) and 6 non-NR ligands inhibited AR-TIF2 PPI formation, and 10 disrupted preexisting complexes. The hits appear to be either AR antagonists or nonspecific inhibitors of NR activation and trafficking. Given that the LOPAC set represents such a small and restricted biological and chemical diversity, it is anticipated that screening a much larger and more diverse compound library will be required to find AR-TIF2 PPI inhibitors/disruptors. The AR-TIF2 protein-protein interaction biosensor (PPIB) approach offers significant promise for identifying molecules with potential to modulate AR transcriptional activity in a cell-specific manner that is distinct from the existing antiandrogen drugs that target AR binding or production. Small molecules that disrupt AR signaling at the level of AR-TIF2 PPIs may also overcome the development of resistance and progression to castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25181412      PMCID: PMC4146499          DOI: 10.1089/adt.2014.594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol        ISSN: 1540-658X            Impact factor:   1.738


  74 in total

1.  High-content pSTAT3/1 imaging assays to screen for selective inhibitors of STAT3 pathway activation in head and neck cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Paul A Johnston; Malabika Sen; Yun Hua; Daniel Camarco; Tong Ying Shun; John S Lazo; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 2.  The changing therapeutic landscape of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy A Yap; Andrea Zivi; Aurelius Omlin; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Characterization of inhibitors of glucocorticoid receptor nuclear translocation: a model of cytoplasmic dynein-mediated cargo transport.

Authors:  Hikmat N Daghestani; Guangyu Zhu; Paul A Johnston; Sunita N Shinde; Jeffrey L Brodsky; Billy W Day
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 1.738

4.  Targeted disruption of the p160 coactivator interface of androgen receptor (AR) selectively inhibits AR activity in both androgen-dependent and castration-resistant AR-expressing prostate cancer cells.

Authors:  Manjula Nakka; Irina U Agoulnik; Nancy L Weigel
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2012-12-25       Impact factor: 5.085

5.  Vav3 enhances androgen receptor splice variant activity and is critical for castration-resistant prostate cancer growth and survival.

Authors:  Stephanie O Peacock; Cale D Fahrenholtz; Kerry L Burnstein
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2012-09-28

Review 6.  Clinical trial update and novel therapeutic approaches for metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  R Larsson; N P Mongan; M Johansson; L Shcherbina; P-A Abrahamsson; L J Gudas; O Sterner; J L Persson
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Androgen receptor co-activators in the regulation of cellular events in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zoran Culig; Frédéric R Santer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Altered corepressor SMRT expression and recruitment to target genes as a mechanism that change the response to androgens in prostate cancer progression.

Authors:  Alejandro S Godoy; Paula C Sotomayor; Marcelo Villagran; Rami Yacoub; Viviana P Montecinos; Eileen M McNerney; Michael Moser; Barbara A Foster; Sergio A Onate
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Development and validation of a high-content screening assay to identify inhibitors of cytoplasmic dynein-mediated transport of glucocorticoid receptor to the nucleus.

Authors:  Paul A Johnston; Sunita N Shinde; Yun Hua; Tong Ying Shun; John S Lazo; Billy W Day
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 1.738

10.  Molecular aspects of androgenic signaling and possible targets for therapeutic intervention in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Zoran Culig; Frédéric R Santer
Journal:  Steroids       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.668

View more
  7 in total

1.  Reconfiguring the AR-TIF2 Protein-Protein Interaction HCS Assay in Prostate Cancer Cells and Characterizing the Hits from a LOPAC Screen.

Authors:  Ashley T Fancher; Yun Hua; Daniel P Camarco; David A Close; Christopher J Strock; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 1.738

2.  High-Content Screening Comparison of Cancer Drug Accumulation and Distribution in Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Culture Models of Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Feng Shan; David A Close; Daniel P Camarco; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.738

3.  Development and Implementation of a High-Throughput High-Content Screening Assay to Identify Inhibitors of Androgen Receptor Nuclear Localization in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Paul A Johnston; Minh M Nguyen; Javid A Dar; Junkui Ai; Yujuan Wang; Khalid Z Masoodi; Tongying Shun; Sunita Shinde; Daniel P Camarco; Yun Hua; Donna M Huryn; Gabriela Mustata Wilson; John S Lazo; Joel B Nelson; Peter Wipf; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.738

4.  Assays to Interrogate the Ability of Compounds to Inhibit the AF-2 or AF-1 Transactivation Domains of the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Ashley T Fancher; Yun Hua; Christopher J Strock; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.738

5.  High-Content Screening Campaign to Identify Compounds That Inhibit or Disrupt Androgen Receptor-Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 2 Protein-Protein Interactions for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ashley T Fancher; Yun Hua; Daniel P Camarco; David A Close; Christopher J Strock; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 1.738

6.  Automated Slide Scanning and Segmentation in Fluorescently-labeled Tissues Using a Widefield High-content Analysis System.

Authors:  Candice C Poon; Vincent Ebacher; Katherine Liu; Voon Wee Yong; John James Patrick Kelly
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 7.  Chemical Screening of Nuclear Receptor Modulators.

Authors:  Mari Ishigami-Yuasa; Hiroyuki Kagechika
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.