Literature DB >> 29215913

High-Content Screening Comparison of Cancer Drug Accumulation and Distribution in Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Culture Models of Head and Neck Cancer.

Feng Shan1, David A Close1, Daniel P Camarco1, Paul A Johnston1,2.   

Abstract

High cancer drug development attrition rates have provoked considerable debate about whether the two-dimensional tumor growth inhibition high-throughput screening assays used in pre-clinical lead discovery adequately reflect solid tumor complexity. We used automated high-content screening image acquisition and analysis methods to compare fluorescent drug uptake, accumulation, and distribution in Cal33 and FaDu head and neck cancer (HNC) monolayer and multicellular tumor spheroid (MCTS) models. Ellipticine, idarubicin, daunorubicin, and doxorubicin were studied because of their fluorescent properties and broad anti-tumor activities. HNC MCTSs were generated in 384-well ultra-low attachment plates where compound exposure, image acquisition, and analysis could be performed in situ. Fluorescent drug accumulation in Cal33 monolayer and MCTS cultures was linear with respect to concentration, and appeared to achieve steady-state levels within 10-15 min of drug exposure, which were maintained through 30-45 min. Drug accumulation in monolayers was independent of cell number and/or density, and every cell achieved uniform drug concentrations. In MCTSs, however, drug accumulation increased as the number of cells and sizes of the MCTSs became bigger. Drugs exhibited restricted penetration and distribution gradients, accumulating preferentially in cells in the outer layers of MCTSs relative to those in the inner cores. Cal33 monolayers were 6-, 20-, 10-, and 16-fold more sensitive than MCTSs to growth inhibition by ellipticine, idarubicin, daunorubicin, and doxorubicin, respectively. In Cal33 MCTSs exposed to ellipticine or doxorubicin for 24 h, MCTSs were smaller and although they still exhibited drug penetration and distribution gradients, the fluorescent intensity difference between outer and inner cells was reduced. After a 24 h exposure, both drugs had penetrated throughout FaDu MCTSs, consistent with drug-induced death of peripheral cell layers enhancing drug penetration. The increased resistance of MCTS cultures and their ability to recapitulate drug penetration and distribution gradients argues strongly for the deployment of these more physiological models in cancer lead discovery. MCTSs have the potential to enhance the correlation between in vitro potencies and in vivo efficacy, and ultimately may lead to improved cancer drug approval rates.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D versus 3D culture models; drug accumulation penetration; drug distribution; multicellular tumor spheroids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29215913      PMCID: PMC5775115          DOI: 10.1089/adt.2017.812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol        ISSN: 1540-658X            Impact factor:   1.738


  58 in total

1.  Cell culture: biology's new dimension.

Authors:  Alison Abbott
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Preclinical development of molecular-targeted agents for cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Ocana; Atanasio Pandiella; Lillian L Siu; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Drug Discovery Approaches Utilizing Three-Dimensional Cell Culture.

Authors:  Sarah-Louise Ryan; Anne-Marie Baird; Gisela Vaz; Aaron J Urquhart; Mathias Senge; Derek J Richard; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Anthony M Davies
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 1.738

4.  Monitoring uptake of ellipticine and its fluorescence lifetime in relation to the cell cycle phase by flow cytometry.

Authors:  B L Sailer; J G Valdez; J A Steinkamp; Z Darzynkiewicz; H A Crissman
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  1997-10-10       Impact factor: 3.905

Review 5.  Patient-derived xenografts as tools in pharmaceutical development.

Authors:  E Izumchenko; J Meir; A Bedi; P T Wysocki; M O Hoque; D Sidransky
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  The penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue as a function of cellular adhesion and packing density of tumor cells.

Authors:  Rama Grantab; Shankar Sivananthan; Ian F Tannock
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01-15       Impact factor: 12.701

7.  Generation of Multicellular Tumor Spheroids with Microwell-Based Agarose Scaffolds for Drug Testing.

Authors:  Xue Gong; Chao Lin; Jian Cheng; Jiansheng Su; Hang Zhao; Tianlin Liu; Xuejun Wen; Peng Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Three-dimensional lung tumor microenvironment modulates therapeutic compound responsiveness in vitro--implication for drug development.

Authors:  Jason E Ekert; Kjell Johnson; Brandy Strake; Jose Pardinas; Stephen Jarantow; Robert Perkinson; David C Colter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Advanced cell culture techniques for cancer drug discovery.

Authors:  Carrie J Lovitt; Todd B Shelper; Vicky M Avery
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2014-05-30

10.  3-Dimensional culture systems for anti-cancer compound profiling and high-throughput screening reveal increases in EGFR inhibitor-mediated cytotoxicity compared to monolayer culture systems.

Authors:  Amy L Howes; Robyn D Richardson; Darren Finlay; Kristiina Vuori
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  High Content Screening Characterization of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Multicellular Tumor Spheroid Cultures Generated in 384-Well Ultra-Low Attachment Plates to Screen for Better Cancer Drug Leads.

Authors:  Stanton J Kochanek; David A Close; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 1.738

2.  Targeting Several Biologically Reported Targets of Glioblastoma Multiforme by Assaying 2D and 3D Cultured Cells.

Authors:  Yudibeth Sixto-López; Emilie Marhuenda; Juan Benjamin García-Vazquez; Manuel Jonathan Fragoso-Vazquez; Martha Cecilia Rosales-Hernández; Oscar Zacarías-Lara; David Méndez-Luna; José Antonio Gómez-Vidal; David Cornu; Bakalara Norbert; José Correa-Basurto
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 5.046

3.  Maximizing the Value of Cancer Drug Screening in Multicellular Tumor Spheroid Cultures: A Case Study in Five Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines.

Authors:  Stanton J Kochanek; David A Close; Daniel P Camarco; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-01-25       Impact factor: 3.341

4.  Head and Neck Cancer Stem Cell-Enriched Spheroid Model for Anticancer Compound Screening.

Authors:  Larisa Goričan; Boris Gole; Uroš Potočnik
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-07-16       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Stroma-Rich Co-Culture Multicellular Tumor Spheroids as a Tool for Photoactive Drugs Screening.

Authors:  Ilya Yakavets; Samuel Jenard; Aurelie Francois; Yulia Maklygina; Victor Loschenov; Henri-Pierre Lassalle; Gilles Dolivet; Lina Bezdetnaya
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Advanced Multi-Dimensional Cellular Models as Emerging Reality to Reproduce In Vitro the Human Body Complexity.

Authors:  Giada Bassi; Maria Aurora Grimaudo; Silvia Panseri; Monica Montesi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Factors to consider when interrogating 3D culture models with plate readers or automated microscopes.

Authors:  Terry Riss; O Joseph Trask
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.416

8.  Modeling Prostate Cancer Treatment Responses in the Organoid Era: 3D Environment Impacts Drug Testing.

Authors:  Annelies Van Hemelryk; Lisanne Mout; Sigrun Erkens-Schulze; Pim J French; Wytske M van Weerden; Martin E van Royen
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-10-22

Review 9.  RNA Sequencing and Cell Models of Virus-Associated Cancer (Review).

Authors:  O V Kurmyshkina; A A Bogdanova; P I Kovchur; A I Fetyukov; T O Volkova
Journal:  Sovrem Tekhnologii Med       Date:  2022-01-28

10.  Carboplatin response in preclinical models for ovarian cancer: comparison of 2D monolayers, spheroids, ex vivo tumors and in vivo models.

Authors:  Melica Nourmoussavi Brodeur; Kayla Simeone; Kim Leclerc-Deslauniers; Hubert Fleury; Euridice Carmona; Diane M Provencher; Anne-Marie Mes-Masson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.