Literature DB >> 30109944

High-Content Screening Campaign to Identify Compounds That Inhibit or Disrupt Androgen Receptor-Transcriptional Intermediary Factor 2 Protein-Protein Interactions for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

Ashley T Fancher1, Yun Hua1, Daniel P Camarco1, David A Close1, Christopher J Strock2, Paul A Johnston1,3.   

Abstract

Twenty percent of prostate cancer (PCa) patients develop a noncurable drug-resistant form of the disease termed castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Overexpression of Androgen Receptor (AR) coactivators such as transcriptional intermediary factor 2 (TIF2) is associated with poor CRPC patient outcomes. We describe the implementation of the AR-TIF2 protein-protein interaction biosensor (PPIB) assay in a high-content screening (HCS) campaign of 143,535 compounds. The assay performed robustly and reproducibly and enabled us to identify compounds that inhibited dihydrotestosterone (DHT)-induced AR-TIF2 protein-protein interaction (PPI) formation or disrupted preexisting AR-TIF2 PPIs. We used multiparameter HCS data z-scores to identify and deprioritize cytotoxic or autofluorescent outliers and confirmed the resulting qualified actives in triplicate. None of the confirmed AR-TIF2 PPIB inhibitors/disruptors exhibited activity in a p53-hDM2 PPIB counter screen, indicating that they were unlikely to be either nonselective PPI inhibitors or to interfere with the biosensor assay format. However, eight confirmed AR-TIF2 PPIB actives also inhibited the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) nuclear translocation counter screen by >50%. These compounds were deprioritized because they either lacked AR specificity/selectivity, or they inhibited a shared component of the AR and GR signaling pathways. Twenty-nine confirmed AR-TIF2 PPIB actives also inhibited the AR nuclear localization counter screen, suggesting that they might indirectly inhibit the AR-TIF2 PPIB assay rather than directly blocking/disrupting PPIs. A total of 62.2% of the confirmed actives inhibited the DHT-induced AR-TIF2 PPI formation in a concentration-dependent manner with IC50s < 40 μM, and 59.4% also disrupted preexisting AR-TIF2 PPI complexes. Overall, the hit rate for the AR-TIF2 PPIB HCS campaign was 0.12%, and most hits inhibited AR-TIF2 PPI formation and disrupted preexisting AR-TIF2 complexes with similar AR-red fluorescent protein distribution phenotypes. Further secondary and tertiary hit characterization assays are underway to select AR-TIF2 PPI inhibitor/disruptor hits suitable for medicinal chemistry lead optimization and development into novel PCa/CRPC therapeutics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  androgen receptor; biosensor; high content imaging; protein-protein interactions; transcriptional intermediary factor 2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30109944      PMCID: PMC6114076          DOI: 10.1089/adt.2018.858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol        ISSN: 1540-658X            Impact factor:   1.738


  58 in total

1.  The glucocorticoid receptor: rapid exchange with regulatory sites in living cells.

Authors:  J G McNally; W G Müller; D Walker; R Wolford; G L Hager
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-02-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Cellular platforms for HTS: three case studies.

Authors:  Paul A Johnston; Patricia A Johnston
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2002-03-15       Impact factor: 7.851

3.  High Content Positional Biosensor Assay to Screen for Compounds that Prevent or Disrupt Androgen Receptor and Transcription Intermediary Factor 2 Protein-Protein Interactions.

Authors:  Yun Hua; Daniel P Camarco; Christopher J Strock; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2018

4.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays.

Authors:  Jonathan B Baell; Georgina A Holloway
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 5.  Androgen receptor signaling in androgen-refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  M E Grossmann; H Huang; D J Tindall
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-11-21       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Inhibition of Androgen Receptor Nuclear Localization and Castration-Resistant Prostate Tumor Growth by Pyrroloimidazole-based Small Molecules.

Authors:  Khalid Z Masoodi; Yadong Xu; Javid A Dar; Kurtis Eisermann; Laura E Pascal; Erica Parrinello; Junkui Ai; Paul A Johnston; Joel B Nelson; Peter Wipf; Zhou Wang
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 6.261

Review 7.  Androgen receptor--an update of mechanisms of action in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Z Culig; A Hobisch; G Bartsch; H Klocker
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2000-08

8.  Profiling the NIH Small Molecule Repository for compounds that generate H2O2 by redox cycling in reducing environments.

Authors:  Karina M Soares; Nicole Blackmon; Tong Ying Shun; Sunita N Shinde; Harold K Takyi; Peter Wipf; John S Lazo; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 9.  Prostate cancer progression after androgen deprivation therapy: mechanisms of castrate resistance and novel therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  T Karantanos; P G Corn; T C Thompson
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Interleukin-6 increases prostate cancer cells resistance to bicalutamide via TIF2.

Authors:  Siting Feng; Qizhu Tang; Meng Sun; Jae Yeon Chun; Christopher P Evans; Allen C Gao
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 6.261

View more
  3 in total

1.  Assays to Interrogate the Ability of Compounds to Inhibit the AF-2 or AF-1 Transactivation Domains of the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Ashley T Fancher; Yun Hua; Christopher J Strock; Paul A Johnston
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.738

2.  Targeting B-Raf inhibitor resistant melanoma with novel cell penetrating peptide disrupters of PDE8A - C-Raf.

Authors:  Connor M Blair; Nicola M Walsh; Bruce H Littman; Frank W Marcoux; George S Baillie
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 3.  Chemical Screening of Nuclear Receptor Modulators.

Authors:  Mari Ishigami-Yuasa; Hiroyuki Kagechika
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.