Literature DB >> 25181298

Identifying chemicals that are planetary boundary threats.

Matthew MacLeod1, Magnus Breitholtz, Ian T Cousins, Cynthia A de Wit, Linn M Persson, Christina Rudén, Michael S McLachlan.   

Abstract

Rockström et al. proposed a set of planetary boundaries that delimit a "safe operating space for humanity". Many of the planetary boundaries that have so far been identified are determined by chemical agents. Other chemical pollution-related planetary boundaries likely exist, but are currently unknown. A chemical poses an unknown planetary boundary threat if it simultaneously fulfills three conditions: (1) it has an unknown disruptive effect on a vital Earth system process; (2) the disruptive effect is not discovered until it is a problem at the global scale, and (3) the effect is not readily reversible. In this paper, we outline scenarios in which chemicals could fulfill each of the three conditions, then use the scenarios as the basis to define chemical profiles that fit each scenario. The chemical profiles are defined in terms of the nature of the effect of the chemical and the nature of exposure of the environment to the chemical. Prioritization of chemicals in commerce against some of the profiles appears feasible, but there are considerable uncertainties and scientific challenges that must be addressed. Most challenging is prioritizing chemicals for their potential to have a currently unknown effect on a vital Earth system process. We conclude that the most effective strategy currently available to identify chemicals that are planetary boundary threats is prioritization against profiles defined in terms of environmental exposure combined with monitoring and study of the biogeochemical processes that underlie vital Earth system processes to identify currently unknown disruptive effects.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25181298     DOI: 10.1021/es501893m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  12 in total

1.  Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Nicoló Aurisano; Jane Bare; Thomas Backhaus; Cécile Bulle; Peter M Chapman; Dick De Zwart; Robert Dwyer; Alexi Ernstoff; Laura Golsteijn; Hanna Holmquist; Olivier Jolliet; Thomas E McKone; Mikołaj Owsianiak; Willie Peijnenburg; Leo Posthuma; Sandra Roos; Erwan Saouter; Diederik Schowanek; Nico M van Straalen; Martina G Vijver; Michael Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Rapid experimental measurements of physicochemical properties to inform models and testing.

Authors:  Chantel I Nicolas; Kamel Mansouri; Katherine A Phillips; Christopher M Grulke; Ann M Richard; Antony J Williams; James Rabinowitz; Kristin K Isaacs; Alice Yau; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class.

Authors:  Carol F Kwiatkowski; David Q Andrews; Linda S Birnbaum; Thomas A Bruton; Jamie C DeWitt; Detlef R U Knappe; Maricel V Maffini; Mark F Miller; Katherine E Pelch; Anna Reade; Anna Soehl; Xenia Trier; Marta Venier; Charlotte C Wagner; Zhanyun Wang; Arlene Blum
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol Lett       Date:  2020-06-30

4.  In Silico Screening-Level Prioritization of 8468 Chemicals Produced in OECD Countries to Identify Potential Planetary Boundary Threats.

Authors:  Efstathios Reppas-Chrysovitsinos; Anna Sobek; Matthew MacLeod
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  An (Eco)Toxicity Life Cycle Impact Assessment Framework for Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Authors:  Hanna Holmquist; Peter Fantke; Ian T Cousins; Mikołaj Owsianiak; Ioannis Liagkouridis; Gregory M Peters
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 6.  Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) as sentinels for the elucidation of Arctic environmental change processes: a comprehensive review combined with ArcRisk project results.

Authors:  Pernilla Carlsson; Knut Breivik; Eva Brorström-Lundén; Ian Cousins; Jesper Christensen; Joan O Grimalt; Crispin Halsall; Roland Kallenborn; Khaled Abass; Gerhard Lammel; John Munthe; Matthew MacLeod; Jon Øyvind Odland; Janet Pawlak; Arja Rautio; Lars-Otto Reiersen; Martin Schlabach; Irene Stemmler; Simon Wilson; Henry Wöhrnschimmel
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 7.  Outside the Safe Operating Space of the Planetary Boundary for Novel Entities.

Authors:  Linn Persson; Bethanie M Carney Almroth; Christopher D Collins; Sarah Cornell; Cynthia A de Wit; Miriam L Diamond; Peter Fantke; Martin Hassellöv; Matthew MacLeod; Morten W Ryberg; Peter Søgaard Jørgensen; Patricia Villarrubia-Gómez; Zhanyun Wang; Michael Zwicky Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 11.357

8.  Microplastics affect sedimentary microbial communities and nitrogen cycling.

Authors:  Meredith E Seeley; Bongkeun Song; Renia Passie; Robert C Hale
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Similar recovery time of microbial functions from fungicide stress across biogeographical regions.

Authors:  Verena C Schreiner; Alexander Feckler; Diego Fernández; Katharina Frisch; Katherine Muñoz; Eduard Szöcs; Jochen P Zubrod; Mirco Bundschuh; Jes J Rasmussen; Ben J Kefford; Josepha Axelsen; Nina Cedergreen; Ralf B Schäfer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Paper-Based Oil Barrier Packaging using Lignin-Containing Cellulose Nanofibrils.

Authors:  Ali H Tayeb; Mehdi Tajvidi; Douglas Bousfield
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.