Literature DB >> 30178491

Toward harmonizing ecotoxicity characterization in life cycle impact assessment.

Peter Fantke1, Nicoló Aurisano1, Jane Bare2, Thomas Backhaus3, Cécile Bulle4, Peter M Chapman5, Dick De Zwart6, Robert Dwyer7, Alexi Ernstoff8, Laura Golsteijn9, Hanna Holmquist10, Olivier Jolliet11, Thomas E McKone12, Mikołaj Owsianiak1, Willie Peijnenburg13, Leo Posthuma13,14, Sandra Roos15, Erwan Saouter16, Diederik Schowanek17, Nico M van Straalen18, Martina G Vijver19, Michael Hauschild1.   

Abstract

Ecosystem quality is an important area of protection in life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). Chemical pollution has adverse impacts on ecosystems on a global scale. To improve methods for assessing ecosystem impacts, the Life Cycle Initiative hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme established a task force to evaluate the state-of-the-science in modeling chemical exposure of organisms and the resulting ecotoxicological effects for use in LCIA. The outcome of the task force work will be global guidance and harmonization by recommending changes to the existing practice of exposure and effect modeling in ecotoxicity characterization. These changes will reflect the current science and ensure the stability of recommended practice. Recommendations must work within the needs of LCIA in terms of 1) operating on information from any inventory reporting chemical emissions with limited spatiotemporal information, 2) applying best estimates rather than conservative assumptions to ensure unbiased comparison with results for other impact categories, and 3) yielding results that are additive across substances and life cycle stages and that will allow a quantitative expression of damage to the exposed ecosystem. We describe the current framework and discuss research questions identified in a roadmap. Primary research questions relate to the approach toward ecotoxicological effect assessment, the need to clarify the method's scope and interpretation of its results, the need to consider additional environmental compartments and impact pathways, and the relevance of effect metrics other than the currently applied geometric mean of toxicity effect data across species. Because they often dominate ecotoxicity results in LCIA, we give metals a special focus, including consideration of their possible essentiality and changes in environmental bioavailability. We conclude with a summary of key questions along with preliminary recommendations to address them as well as open questions that require additional research efforts. Environ Toxicol Chem 2018;37:2955-2971.
© 2018 SETAC. © 2018 SETAC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecosystem exposure; Ecotoxicology; Environmental modeling; Life cycle impact assessment; Species sensitivity distributions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30178491      PMCID: PMC7372721          DOI: 10.1002/etc.4261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  48 in total

1.  New method for calculating comparative toxicity potential of cationic metals in freshwater: application to copper, nickel, and zinc.

Authors:  Nilima Gandhi; Miriam L Diamond; Dik van de Meent; Mark A J Huijbregts; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Jeroen Guinée
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  Indirect effects of contaminants in aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  John W Fleeger; Kevin R Carman; Roger M Nisbet
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  The evaluation of the equilibrium partitioning method using sensitivity distributions of species in water and soil.

Authors:  Patrick van Beelen; Eric M J Verbruggen; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 7.086

4.  Effects of pesticides on community structure and ecosystem functions in agricultural streams of three biogeographical regions in Europe.

Authors:  Ralf Bernhard Schäfer; Thierry Caquet; Katri Siimes; Ralf Mueller; Laurent Lagadic; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Cumulative risk assessment: a European perspective on the state of the art and the necessary next steps forward.

Authors:  Thomas Backhaus; Michael Faust; Andreas Kortenkamp
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.992

6.  Exploring REACH as a potential data source for characterizing ecotoxicity in life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Nienke Müller; Dick de Zwart; Michael Hauschild; Gaël Kijko; Peter Fantke
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 3.742

7.  Setting the stage for debating the roles of risk assessment and life-cycle assessment of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Jeroen B Guinée; Reinout Heijungs; Martina G Vijver; Willie J G M Peijnenburg
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 39.213

8.  Sensitivity of hypogean and epigean freshwater copepods to agricultural pollutants.

Authors:  T Di Lorenzo; W D Di Marzio; M E Sáenz; M Baratti; A A Dedonno; A Iannucci; S Cannicci; G Messana; D M P Galassi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 4.223

9.  Assessment of Metal Toxicity in Marine Ecosystems: Comparative Toxicity Potentials for Nine Cationic Metals in Coastal Seawater.

Authors:  Yan Dong; Ralph K Rosenbaum; Michael Z Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Assessing comparative terrestrial ecotoxicity of Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn: The influence of aging and emission source.

Authors:  Mikołaj Owsianiak; Peter E Holm; Peter Fantke; Karen S Christiansen; Ole K Borggaard; Michael Z Hauschild
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 8.071

View more
  5 in total

1.  Introducing ground cover management in pesticide emission modeling.

Authors:  Céline Gentil-Sergent; Claudine Basset-Mens; Christel Renaud-Gentié; Charles Mottes; Carlos Melero; Arthur Launay; Peter Fantke
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  An (Eco)Toxicity Life Cycle Impact Assessment Framework for Per- And Polyfluoroalkyl Substances.

Authors:  Hanna Holmquist; Peter Fantke; Ian T Cousins; Mikołaj Owsianiak; Ioannis Liagkouridis; Gregory M Peters
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  A Critical Review of Organic Ultraviolet Filter Exposure, Hazard, and Risk to Corals.

Authors:  Carys L Mitchelmore; Emily E Burns; Annaleise Conway; Andrew Heyes; Iain A Davies
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 3.742

4.  Exposure and Toxicity Characterization of Chemical Emissions and Chemicals in Products: Global Recommendations and Implementation in USEtox.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Weihsueh A Chiu; Lesa Aylward; Richard Judson; Lei Huang; Suji Jang; Todd Gouin; Lorenz Rhomberg; Nicolò Aurisano; Thomas McKone; Olivier Jolliet
Journal:  Int J Life Cycle Assess       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.141

Review 5.  Building a European exposure science strategy.

Authors:  Peter Fantke; Natalie von Goetz; Urs Schlüter; Jos Bessems; Alison Connolly; Tatsiana Dudzina; Andreas Ahrens; Jim Bridges; Marie A Coggins; André Conrad; Otto Hänninen; Gerhard Heinemeyer; Stylianos Kephalopoulos; Michael McLachlan; Tim Meijster; Veronique Poulsen; Dag Rother; Theo Vermeire; Susana Viegas; Jelle Vlaanderen; Maryam Zare Jeddi; Yuri Bruinen de Bruin
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.563

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.