Tyler M Moore1, Steven P Reise2, Raquel E Gur3, Hakon Hakonarson4, Ruben C Gur3. 1. Brain Behavior Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Psychology, University of California-Los Angeles. 3. Brain Behavior Laboratory. 4. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB) was designed to measure performance accuracy and speed on specific neurobehavioral domains using tests that were previously validated with functional neuroimaging. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the neuropsychological theory used to construct the CNB by confirming the factor structure of the tests composing it. METHOD: In a large community sample (N = 9,138; age range 8-21), we performed a correlated-traits confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multiple exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) on the 12 CNB measures of Efficiency (which combine Accuracy and Speed). We then performed EFAs of the Accuracy and Speed measures separately. Finally, we performed a confirmatory bifactor analysis of the Efficiency scores. All analyses were performed with Mplus using maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: RESULTS strongly support the a priori theory used to construct the CNB, showing that tests designed to measure executive, episodic memory, complex cognition, and social cognition aggregate their loadings within these domains. When Accuracy and Speed were analyzed separately, Accuracy produced 3 reliable factors: executive and complex cognition, episodic memory, and social cognition, while speed produced 2 factors: tests that require fast responses and those where each item requires deliberation. The statistical "Fit" of almost all models described above was acceptable (usually excellent). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the analysis from these large-scale data, the CNB offers an effective means for measuring the integrity of intended neurocognitive domains in about 1 hour of testing and is thus suitable for large-scale clinical and genomic studies. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: The Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery (CNB) was designed to measure performance accuracy and speed on specific neurobehavioral domains using tests that were previously validated with functional neuroimaging. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the neuropsychological theory used to construct the CNB by confirming the factor structure of the tests composing it. METHOD: In a large community sample (N = 9,138; age range 8-21), we performed a correlated-traits confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and multiple exploratory factor analyses (EFAs) on the 12 CNB measures of Efficiency (which combine Accuracy and Speed). We then performed EFAs of the Accuracy and Speed measures separately. Finally, we performed a confirmatory bifactor analysis of the Efficiency scores. All analyses were performed with Mplus using maximum likelihood estimation. RESULTS: RESULTS strongly support the a priori theory used to construct the CNB, showing that tests designed to measure executive, episodic memory, complex cognition, and social cognition aggregate their loadings within these domains. When Accuracy and Speed were analyzed separately, Accuracy produced 3 reliable factors: executive and complex cognition, episodic memory, and social cognition, while speed produced 2 factors: tests that require fast responses and those where each item requires deliberation. The statistical "Fit" of almost all models described above was acceptable (usually excellent). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the analysis from these large-scale data, the CNB offers an effective means for measuring the integrity of intended neurocognitive domains in about 1 hour of testing and is thus suitable for large-scale clinical and genomic studies. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved.
Authors: R C Gur; J D Ragland; P J Moberg; T H Turner; W B Bilker; C Kohler; S J Siegel; R E Gur Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2001-11 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: David R Roalf; Kosha Ruparel; Ragini Verma; Mark A Elliott; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2012-11-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; John A Hansen; Matthew K Nock; Steven Heeringa; Robert J Ursano; Murray B Stein Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: Michael L Thomas; Gregory G Brown; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Virginie M Patt; Victoria B Risbrough; Dewleen G Baker Journal: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 2.475
Authors: M Postans; G D Parker; H Lundell; M Ptito; K Hamandi; W P Gray; J P Aggleton; T B Dyrby; D K Jones; M Winter Journal: Cereb Cortex Date: 2020-03-14 Impact factor: 5.357
Authors: Bart Larsen; Josiane Bourque; Tyler M Moore; Azeez Adebimpe; Monica E Calkins; Mark A Elliott; Ruben C Gur; Raquel E Gur; Paul J Moberg; David R Roalf; Kosha Ruparel; Bruce I Turetsky; Simon N Vandekar; Daniel H Wolf; Russell T Shinohara; Theodore D Satterthwaite Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2020-01-27 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Sunny X Tang; Kevin H Seelaus; Tyler M Moore; Jerome Taylor; Carol Moog; David O'Connor; Marla Burkholder; Christian G Kohler; Paul M Grant; Dvora Eliash; Monica E Calkins; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2019-06-09 Impact factor: 2.732
Authors: Theodore D Satterthwaite; John J Connolly; Kosha Ruparel; Monica E Calkins; Chad Jackson; Mark A Elliott; David R Roalf; Ryan Hopson; Karthik Prabhakaran; Meckenzie Behr; Haijun Qiu; Frank D Mentch; Rosetta Chiavacci; Patrick M A Sleiman; Ruben C Gur; Hakon Hakonarson; Raquel E Gur Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Catherine E Hegarty; Dietsje D Jolles; Eva Mennigen; Maria Jalbrzikowski; Carrie E Bearden; Katherine H Karlsgodt Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2018-12-27
Authors: Zaixu Cui; Hongming Li; Cedric H Xia; Bart Larsen; Azeez Adebimpe; Graham L Baum; Matt Cieslak; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Desmond J Oathes; Aaron F Alexander-Bloch; Armin Raznahan; David R Roalf; Russell T Shinohara; Daniel H Wolf; Christos Davatzikos; Danielle S Bassett; Damien A Fair; Yong Fan; Theodore D Satterthwaite Journal: Neuron Date: 2020-02-19 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero; Felix Inchausti; Alicia Pérez-Albéniz; Javier Ortuño-Sierra Journal: Int J Methods Psychiatr Res Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 4.035