BACKGROUND:Low-carbohydrate diets are popular for weight loss, but their cardiovascular effects have not been well-studied, particularly in diverse populations. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a low-carbohydrate diet compared with a low-fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN: A randomized, parallel-group trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00609271). SETTING: A large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 148 men and women without clinical cardiovascular disease and diabetes. INTERVENTION: A low-carbohydrate (<40 g/d) or low-fat (<30% of daily energy intake from total fat [<7% saturated fat]) diet. Both groups received dietary counseling at regular intervals throughout the trial. MEASUREMENTS: Data on weight, cardiovascular risk factors, and dietary composition were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS:Sixty participants (82%) in the low-fat group and 59 (79%) in the low-carbohydrate group completed the intervention. At 12 months, participants on the low-carbohydrate diet had greater decreases in weight (mean difference in change, -3.5 kg [95% CI, -5.6 to -1.4 kg]; P = 0.002), fat mass (mean difference in change, -1.5% [CI, -2.6% to -0.4%]; P = 0.011), ratio of total-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mean difference in change, -0.44 [CI, -0.71 to -0.16]; P = 0.002), and triglyceride level (mean difference in change, -0.16 mmol/L [-14.1 mg/dL] [CI, -0.31 to -0.01 mmol/L {-27.4 to -0.8 mg/dL}]; P = 0.038) and greater increases in HDL cholesterol level (mean difference in change, 0.18 mmol/L [7.0 mg/dL] [CI, 0.08 to 0.28 mmol/L {3.0 to 11.0 mg/dL}]; P < 0.001) than those on the low-fat diet. LIMITATION: Lack of clinical cardiovascular disease end points. CONCLUSION: The low-carbohydrate diet was more effective for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor reduction than the low-fat diet. Restricting carbohydrate may be an option for persons seeking to lose weight and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Low-carbohydrate diets are popular for weight loss, but their cardiovascular effects have not been well-studied, particularly in diverse populations. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of a low-carbohydrate diet compared with a low-fat diet on body weight and cardiovascular risk factors. DESIGN: A randomized, parallel-group trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00609271). SETTING: A large academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: 148 men and women without clinical cardiovascular disease and diabetes. INTERVENTION: A low-carbohydrate (<40 g/d) or low-fat (<30% of daily energy intake from total fat [<7% saturated fat]) diet. Both groups received dietary counseling at regular intervals throughout the trial. MEASUREMENTS: Data on weight, cardiovascular risk factors, and dietary composition were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Sixty participants (82%) in the low-fat group and 59 (79%) in the low-carbohydrate group completed the intervention. At 12 months, participants on the low-carbohydrate diet had greater decreases in weight (mean difference in change, -3.5 kg [95% CI, -5.6 to -1.4 kg]; P = 0.002), fat mass (mean difference in change, -1.5% [CI, -2.6% to -0.4%]; P = 0.011), ratio of total-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (mean difference in change, -0.44 [CI, -0.71 to -0.16]; P = 0.002), and triglyceride level (mean difference in change, -0.16 mmol/L [-14.1 mg/dL] [CI, -0.31 to -0.01 mmol/L {-27.4 to -0.8 mg/dL}]; P = 0.038) and greater increases in HDL cholesterol level (mean difference in change, 0.18 mmol/L [7.0 mg/dL] [CI, 0.08 to 0.28 mmol/L {3.0 to 11.0 mg/dL}]; P < 0.001) than those on the low-fat diet. LIMITATION: Lack of clinical cardiovascular disease end points. CONCLUSION: The low-carbohydrate diet was more effective for weight loss and cardiovascular risk factor reduction than the low-fat diet. Restricting carbohydrate may be an option for persons seeking to lose weight and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institutes of Health.
Authors: R M Krauss; R H Eckel; B Howard; L J Appel; S R Daniels; R J Deckelbaum; J W Erdman; P Kris-Etherton; I J Goldberg; T A Kotchen; A H Lichtenstein; W E Mitch; R Mullis; K Robinson; J Wylie-Rosett; S St Jeor; J Suttie; D L Tribble; T L Bazzarre Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-10-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; David Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Pamela J Schreiner; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Prakash Seshadri; Nayyar Iqbal; Linda Stern; Monica Williams; Kathryn L Chicano; Denise A Daily; Joyce McGrory; Edward J Gracely; Daniel J Rader; Frederick F Samaha Journal: Am J Med Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Linda Stern; Nayyar Iqbal; Prakash Seshadri; Kathryn L Chicano; Denise A Daily; Joyce McGrory; Monica Williams; Edward J Gracely; Frederick F Samaha Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2004-05-18 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Gary D Foster; Holly R Wyatt; James O Hill; Brian G McGuckin; Carrie Brill; B Selma Mohammed; Philippe O Szapary; Daniel J Rader; Joel S Edman; Samuel Klein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Frederick F Samaha; Nayyar Iqbal; Prakash Seshadri; Kathryn L Chicano; Denise A Daily; Joyce McGrory; Terrence Williams; Monica Williams; Edward J Gracely; Linda Stern Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Emelia J Benjamin; Michael J Blaha; Stephanie E Chiuve; Mary Cushman; Sandeep R Das; Rajat Deo; Sarah D de Ferranti; James Floyd; Myriam Fornage; Cathleen Gillespie; Carmen R Isasi; Monik C Jiménez; Lori Chaffin Jordan; Suzanne E Judd; Daniel Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Chris T Longenecker; Rachel H Mackey; Kunihiro Matsushita; Dariush Mozaffarian; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Mathew J Reeves; Matthew Ritchey; Carlos J Rodriguez; Gregory A Roth; Wayne D Rosamond; Comilla Sasson; Amytis Towfighi; Connie W Tsao; Melanie B Turner; Salim S Virani; Jenifer H Voeks; Joshua Z Willey; John T Wilkins; Jason Hy Wu; Heather M Alger; Sally S Wong; Paul Muntner Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: G Misciagna; M Del Pilar Díaz; D V Caramia; C Bonfiglio; I Franco; M R Noviello; M Chiloiro; D I Abbrescia; A Mirizzi; M Tanzi; M G Caruso; M Correale; R Reddavide; R Inguaggiato; A M Cisternino; A R Osella Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Jean-Marc Schwarz; Susan M Noworolski; Michael J Wen; Artem Dyachenko; Jessica L Prior; Melissa E Weinberg; Laurie A Herraiz; Viva W Tai; Nathalie Bergeron; Thomas P Bersot; Madhu N Rao; Morris Schambelan; Kathleen Mulligan Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-03-31 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: George A Bray; William E Heisel; Ashkan Afshin; Michael D Jensen; William H Dietz; Michael Long; Robert F Kushner; Stephen R Daniels; Thomas A Wadden; Adam G Tsai; Frank B Hu; John M Jakicic; Donna H Ryan; Bruce M Wolfe; Thomas H Inge Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 19.871