| Literature DB >> 25178313 |
Li Yang, Xiaoling Xu1, Jing Yan, Wei Yu, Xinhua Tang, Haibin Wu, Christy L Parkin.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of hypertension in China has risen dramatically in recent decades, but it is not well understood if hypertension is adequately controlled in the elderly population in Southern China. A provincial survey was performed in order to estimate the prevalence of hypertension control and the associated factors in the elderly population.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25178313 PMCID: PMC4247067 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-903
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 3.295
Distribution of socio demographic factors among participants, by gender (n = 10644)
| Variables | Men (n = 5117) | Women (n = 5527) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 70.4 ± 7.3 | 70.3 ± 7.6 | 0.008 |
|
| 23.6 ± 2.9 | 24.9 ± 3.4 | 0.003 |
|
| |||
| Systolic | 142.7 ± 15.7 | 142.6 ± 15.6 | 0.77 |
| Diastolic | 84.38 ± 8.96 | 83.6 ± 8.8 | 0.19 |
|
| |||
| Urban | 1468 (28.7) | 1542 (27.9) | 0.37 |
| Suburban | 2144 (41.9) | 2337 (42.3) | |
| Rural | 1505 (29.4) | 1648 (29.8) | |
|
| |||
| College or higher | 271 (5.3) | 116 (2.1) | <0.001 |
| Middle | 1039 (20.3) | 668 (12.1) | |
| Primary | 2446 (47.8) | 1766 (31.9) | |
| Illiterate | 1361 (26.6) | 2977 (53.9) | |
|
| 951 (18.6) | 995 (18.0) | 0.08 |
|
| 1229 (24.0) | 425 (7.7) | <0.001 |
|
| 1298 (25.4) | 452 (8.2) | <0.001 |
|
| 1470 (28.7) | 1678 (30.4) | 0.01 |
|
| 315 (6.2) | 531 (9.6) | 0.003 |
|
| |||
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.32 ± 1.14 | 5.51 ± 1.33 | 0.002 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.51 ± 0.93 | 1.75 ± 1.08 | 0.001 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.48 ± 1.00 | 4.60 ± 1.06 | 0.03 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.45 ± 0.75 | 1.40 ± 0.58 | 0.06 |
Control of hypertension among elderly hypertensive patients in Southern China in 2011
| Variables | Normal | Pre-hypertension | Hypertension | Control rate (%) | P-value 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stage II | Stage III | |||||
|
| 138 (1.3) | 3532 (33.2) | 2885 (27.1) | 25 (0.2) | 44.6 | |
|
| ||||||
| Women | 66 (1.2) | 1895 (34.3) | 1470 (26.6) | 7 (0.1) | 46.8 | 0.003 |
| Men | 72 (1.4) | 1637 (32.0) | 1415 (27.6) | 18 (0.3) | 42.6 | |
|
| ||||||
| 60-69 years | 77 (1.4) | 1817 (34.3) | 1309 (24.7) | 11 (0.2) | 50.8 | <0.001 |
| 70-79 years | 45 (1.2) | 1235 (31.5) | 1158 (29.5) | 9 (0.2) | 40.7 | |
| ≥80 years | 16 (1.1) | 430 (30.2) | 478 (33.5) | 5 (0.4) | 37.6 | |
|
| ||||||
| Urban | 105 (3.3) | 1119 (35.5) | 663 (21.0) | 6 (0.2) | 51.1 | <0.001 |
| Suburban | 55 (1.2) | 979 (21.8) | 1511 (33.6) | 13 (0.3) | 31.4 | |
| Rural | 23 (0.8) | 708 (23.5) | 898 (29.8) | 6 (0.2) | 34.2 | |
|
| ||||||
| College or higher | 5 (1.3) | 131 (35.6) | 98 (26.7) | 1 (0.2) | 49.2 | <0.001 |
| Middle | 23 (1.4) | 557 (33.7) | 440 (26.6) | 2 (0.1) | 45.2 | |
| Primary | 33 (0.8) | 1191 (29.2) | 1113 (27.3) | 9 (0.2) | 40.2 | |
| Illiterate | 34 (0.8) | 1038 (24.7) | 1297 (30.8) | 13 (0.3) | 33.7 | |
|
| 62 (1.2) | 2010 (39.3) | 1006 (19.7) | 5 (0.1) | 42.8 | |
|
| 34 (1.0) | 1016 (30.4) | 968 (28.9) | 5 (0.1) | 38.2 | |
|
| 37 (1.1) | 1021 (30.4) | 961 (28.6) | 5 (0.1) | 39.4 | |
|
| 28 (0.8) | 998 (30.2) | 984 (29.8) | 4 (0.1) | 37.4 | |
|
| 31 (1.1) | 751 (26.0) | 898 (31.1) | 7 (0.2) | 33.3 | |
|
| ||||||
| Normal | 67 (1.0) | 2527 (36.4) | 1856 (26.8) | 6 (0.1) | 50.6 | <0.001 |
| IFG | 7 (1.1) | 178 (28.2) | 194 (30.7) | 9 (1.4) | 40.4 | |
| DM | 2 (0.4) | 135 (25.9) | 161 (30.9) | 10 (1.9) | 36.5 | |
|
| ||||||
| Normal | 50 (1.1) | 1516 (33.3) | 1159 (25.4) | 6 (0.1) | 48.7 | <0.001 |
| Slightly high | 14 (1.1) | 324 (25.0) | 452 (34.9) | 9 (0.5) | 36.4 | |
| High | 6 (0.6) | 256 (23.7) | 360 (33.4) | 10 (0.9) | 31.4 | |
|
| ||||||
| Normal | 58 (1.1) | 1542 (27.9) | 1639 (29.6) | 9 (0.2) | 45.9 | 0.003 |
| Slightly high | 12 (0.9) | 371 (27.1) | 422 (30.8) | 6 (0.4) | 42.2 | |
| High | 1 (0.3) | 114 (31.7) | 91 (25.3) | 10 (2.8) | 37.4 | |
|
| ||||||
| Normal | 86 (1.2) | 1981 (26.9) | 2174 (29.5) | 35 (0.5) | 43.3 | 0.004 |
| Low | 93 (1.3) | 1782 (24.2) | 2144 (29.1) | 14 (0.2) | 40.8 | |
1P-value: Comparisons among control rates by chi-square test.
Figure 1The awareness of hypertension among elderly hypertensive patients in Southern China in 2011.
Figure 2The treatment of hypertension among elderly hypertensive patients in Southern China in 2011.
Prevalence of use of commonly prescribed classes of anti-hypertension medications among hypertensive participants (n,%)
| Medication | Urban (n = 3010) | Suburban (n = 4481) | Rural (n = 3153) | All (n = 10644) | P-value 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 764 (25.4) | 1675 (37.4) | 1006 (31.9) | 3445 (32.4) | <0.001 |
| DIU | 65 (2.2) | 443 (9.9) | 139 (4.4) | 647 (6.1) | 0.001 |
| ACEI/ARB | 157 (5.2) | 313 (7.0) | 174 (5.5) | 644 (6.1) | 0.003 |
| BB | 22 (0.7) | 57 (1.3) | 49 (1.5) | 128 (1.2) | 0.04 |
| CCB | 520 (17.3) | 862 (19.2) | 644 (20.4) | 2026 (19.0) | 0.04 |
|
| 2246 (74.6) | 2906 (62.6) | 2147 (68.1) | 7299 (68.6) | <0.001 |
| Fixed-dose combination | 1426 (47.4) | 1748 (39.0) | 1578 (50.1) | 4752 (44.6) | <0.001 |
| Single pill combination | 863 (28.7) | 946 (21.1) | 712 (20.6) | 2521 (23.7) | 0.002 |
| Free combination | 43 (1.4) | 212 (4.7) | 143 (4.5) | 398 (3.7) | 0.012 |
1P-value: Comparisons among urban, suburban and rural subjects by chi-square test.
Factors associated with uncontrolled hypertension among elderly hypertensive patients in Southern China in 2011 analyzed by crude and adjusted regression model
| Variables | Total (n = 10644) | Men (n = 5117) | Women (n = 5527) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COR 1 (95%CI) 3 | AOR 2 (95%CI) 3 | COR 1 (95%CI) 3 | AOR 2 (95%CI) 3 | COR 1 (95%CI) 3 | AOR 2 (95%CI) 3 | |
|
| ||||||
| 70-79 years | 1.5 (1.3-1.9) | 1.6 (1.4-2.2) | 1.7 (1.3-1.9) | 1.9 (1.6-2.7) | 1.5 (1.0-1.8) | 1.7 (1.2-2.4) |
| ≥ 80 years | 1.8 (1.5-2.1) | 1.9 (1.6-2.6) | 1.8 (1.5-2.1) | 2.2 (1.5-3.3) | 1.4 (1.0-1.6) | 1.6 (1.2-1.9) |
|
| ||||||
| Suburban | 1.5 (1.2-1.6) | 1.6 (1.1-1.9) | 1.4 (1.0-1.9) | 1.7 (1.2-2.5) | 1.1 (1.1-1.6) | 1.4 (1.0-2.0) |
| Rural | 1.3 (1.1-1.6) | 1.4 (1.1-2.1) | 1.3 (1.0-2.0) | 1.5 (1.1-2.2) | 1.0 (1.0-1.8) | 1.3 (1.0-1.8) |
|
| ||||||
| Middle | 1.7 (1.4-2.3) | 1.3 (0.8-2.0) | 1.6 (1.3-2.3) | 1.2 (0.7-1.8) | 1.7 (1.3-2.5) | 1.3 (0.9-1.9) |
| Primary | 2.0 (1.5-2.7) | 1.5 (1.2-1.9) | 2.0 (1.7-2.6) | 1.9 (1.5-2.6) | 1.9 (1.5-2.9) | 1.4 (0.9-2.1) |
| Illiterate | 2.3 (1.7-2.8) | 2.1 (1.6-2.7) | 2.4 (1.8-3.0) | 2.9 (2.1-4.1) | 2.2 (1.6-2.8) | 1.7 (1.3-2.3) |
|
| 1.8 (1.5-2.6) | 1.2 (1.0-1.3) | 1.5 (1.0-2.0) | 1.6 (1.1-2.4) | 1.9 (1.1-2.2) | 2.0 (1.2-2.6) |
|
| 2.7 (2.1-4.1) | 2.8 (1.6-3.9) | 3.4 (1.2-2.2) | 3.8 (2.1-4.5) | 2.3 (1.2-3.8) | 2.5 (1.4-3.8) |
|
| 2.5 (1.5-3.9) | 2.0 (0.9-3.1) | 2.7 (1.6-4.1) | 2.1 (1.2-3.3) | 2.2 (1.2-3.3) | 1.9 (0.8-2.6) |
|
| 1.3 (1.0-1.6) | 1.5 (1.1-2.4) | 1.0 (0.9-1.2) | 1.2 (0.9-2.1) | 0.9 (0.5-1.1) | 0.6 (0.2-1.1) |
|
| 0.6 (0.1-0.9) | 0.8 (0.0-0.9) | 0.7 (0.0-0.9) | 0.8 (0.5-0.9) | 0.6 (0.1-1.1) | 0.7 (0.2-1.2) |
|
| ||||||
| Overweight | 2.5 (2.0-3.6) | 2.3 (1.5-4.0) | 2.1 (1.8-2.5) | 2.4 (1.2-3.2) | 2.4 (2.1-2.8) | 2.5 (1.5-3.5) |
| Obesity | 2.9 (1.9-3.8) | 3.3 (2.9-4.3) | 2.4 (1.9-3.0) | 3.0 (1.3-3.9) | 2.5 (2.1-3.1) | 2.6 (1.4-3.8) |
|
| ||||||
| IFG | 2.4 (1.5-3.2) | 2.5 (1.2-3.2) | 2.5 (1.5-3.2) | 2.6 (1.9-3.6) | 2.4 (1.6-3.3) | 3.2 (0.8-4.0) |
| DM | 2.7 (1.4-4.2) | 1.2 (1.0-2.4) | 3.1 (2.3-4.0) | 3.3 (2.3-4.2) | 2.8 (1.9-4.3) | 2.5 (1.2-3.2) |
|
| ||||||
| Slightly high | 2.6 (1.3-2.9) | 2.1 (0.8-3.2) | 2.2 (1.3-3.1) | 2.3 (0.9-3.1) | 2.5 (1.5-2.9) | 2.6 (1.9-3.5) |
| High | 2.8 (1.4-3.2) | 2.5 (0.9-2.9) | 2.5 (1.2-3.3) | 2.6 (1.6-3.5) | 2.7 (1.5-3.2) | 2.8 (2.0-3.6) |
|
| ||||||
| Slightly high | 0.6 (0.3-1.1) | 0.5 (0.0-1.3) | 0.5 (0.1-0.8) | 0.6 (0.2-0.9) | 0.6 (0.0-1.6) | 1.1 (1.0-1.3) |
| High | 0.7 (0.4-0.9) | 0.2 (0.0-1.6) | 0.9 (0.6-1.2) | 1.0 (0.6-1.5) | 0.8 (0.2-0.9) | 0.7 (0.0-0.9) |
|
| 0.6 (0.4-0.9) | 0.7 (0.1-1.1) | 1.3 (1.0-1.8) | 1.1 (0.8-2.1) | 1.2 (1.0-1.9) | 1.2 (1.0-1.8) |
1COR: Crude odds ratio in the model with unadjusted association.
2AOR: Adjusted odds ratios in the model with multivariate models adjusted by age group and area of residence.
395% CI, 95% confidence interval.