| Literature DB >> 26993260 |
Bo Yang1, Fang Ding2, Jing Yan2, Xiong-Wei Ye2, Xiao-Lin Xu2, Feng-Lei Wang1, Duo Li3, Wei Yu4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have assessed relationships between circulating levels of fatty acid (FA) and blood pressure (BP), and their results remain controversial. Nevertheless, data are sparse on serum FA as biomarker and BP in China. The aim of the study was to investigate the association between serum FA and BP in Chinese populations.Entities:
Keywords: Blood pressure; Factor analysis; Fatty acid; Hypertension
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26993260 PMCID: PMC4797152 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-016-0226-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Characteristics of participants by BP status in Zhejiang Province, China
| Variables | Total subjects ( | Hypertensive ( | Normotensive ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographics, %b | ||||
| Age, | < 0.01 | |||
| Middle-age (≤ 55 y) | 49.11 | 53.59 | 47.13 | |
| Elder (> 55 y) | 50.89 | 46.41 | 52.87 | |
| Females | 52.88 | 51.87 | 53.33 | 0.48 |
| Education levels | < 0.01 | |||
| Primary (< 9 years) | 66.89 | 75.61 | 62.31 | |
| Secondary (9–12 years) | 27.86 | 21.41 | 31.25 | |
| High (>12 years) | 5.25 | 2.98 | 6.44 | |
| Profession | 0.01 | |||
| Manual labor | 38.66 | 34.24 | 40.64 | |
| non-manual labor | 61.34 | 65.76 | 59.36 | |
| Lifestyle factors, %b | ||||
| Smoking habit | 0.01 | |||
| Current smokers (≥ 18 pack/year) | 24.28 | 20.94 | 25.75 | |
| Former/never | 75.72 | 79.06 | 74.25 | |
| Drinking habit | 0.04 | |||
| Current (≥ 25 g/day) | 26.86 | 25.13 | 28.62 | |
| Former/never | 73.14 | 74.87 | 71.38 | |
| Salt consumption | 0.01 | |||
| High-salt (> 6 g/day) | 25.72 | 29.21 | 24.18 | |
| Moderate/low-salt | 74.28 | 70.79 | 76.82 | |
| Exercise habit | < 0.01 | |||
| Regular (≥ 3 times/week) | 23.85 | 20.76 | 28.95 | |
| Irregular/never | 76.15 | 79.24 | 71.05 | |
| Family history of hypertension, %b | ||||
| Yes | 24.43 | 34.46 | 20.99 | < 0.01 |
| No | 75.57 | 65.54 | 79.01 | |
| Anthropometry indicators, mean (SD)c | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.80 (3.23) | 24.93 (3.43) | 23.44 (3.18) | < 0.01 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 126.42 (17.95) | 137.10 (12.76) | 119.44 (14.78) | < 0.01 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 81.22 (7.53) | 86.28 (8.66) | 79.70 (6.10) | < 0.01 |
| HR (beat/min) | 71.00 (10.19) | 72.88 (11.07) | 70.53 (9.75) | < 0.01 |
| Biochemical parameters, median (QR)d | ||||
| TG(mmol/L) | 1.26 (0.88–1.86) | 1.47 (1.01–2.08) | 1.19 (0.83–1.73) | < 0.01 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.59 (4.07–5.24) | 4.73 (4.19–5.35) | 4.54 (4.02–5.85) | < 0.01 |
| Fbg (mmol/L) | 4.64 (4.29–5.08) | 4.73 (4.36–5.22) | 4.60 (4.24–5.00) | < 0.01 |
SD standard deviation, BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, QR quartile range, TG triglyceride, TC total cholesterol, Fbg fasting blood-glucose
a P value for significance between hypertensive and normotensive group with Student’s unpaired ttest and chi-square test, respectively
bCategorical data are presented as a percentage (%)
cContinuous data with a normal distribution are presented as mean (standard deviation)
dThe skewed data were expressed as the median (quartile range), and were log-transformed before statistic analyses
Serum fatty acid profile between hypertensive and normotensive participants
| FA (%) | Hypertensive ( | Normotensive ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean/Median | SD/QR | Mean/Median | SD/QR | ||
| 14:0 | 1.61 | 1.40–1.80 | 1.56 | 1.29–1.74 | 0.033 |
| 16:0 | 20.62 | 2.60 | 21.05 | 2.57 | <0.001 |
| 18:0 | 6.40 | 0.85 | 6.34 | 0.78 | 0.036 |
| 20:0 | 0.48 | 0.30–0.73 | 0.51 | 0.20–0.85 | 0.148 |
| 22:0 | 0.55 | 0.33–1.43 | 0.44 | 0.27–1.27 | 0.012 |
| 24:0 | 0.39 | 0.31–0.42 | 0.40 | 0.27–0.45 | 0.127 |
| 16:1n-7 | 1.69 | 0.82 | 1.52 | 0.78 | <0.001 |
| 18:1n-9 | 19.98 | 3.75 | 18.95 | 3.75 | <0.001 |
| 24:1n-9 | 1.20 | 0.92–1.34 | 1.18 | 0.82–1.22 | 0.121 |
| 18:3n-3 | 0.94 | 0.37 | 0.93 | 0.41 | 0.058 |
| 20:5n-3 | 3.31 | 1.55 | 3.35 | 1.60 | 0.436 |
| 22:5n-3 | 0.47 | 0.38–0.58 | 0.46 | 0.38–0.56 | 0.528 |
| 22:6n-3 | 1.65 | 0.51 | 1.74 | 0.69 | 0.005 |
| 18:2n-6 | 27.40 | 5.21 | 28.52 | 5.28 | <0.001 |
| 18:3n-6 | 0.36 | 0.25–0.51 | 0.32 | 0.20–0.46 | <0.001 |
| 20:3n-6 | 1.16 | 0.32 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 0.018 |
| 20:4n-6 | 6.04 | 1.56 | 6.01 | 1.62 | 0.120 |
| 20:4n-6/20:3n-6 | 5.20 | 0.87 | 5.66 | 0.96 | <0.001 |
| 18:2n-6/18:3n-6 (×10−2) | 1.34 | 0.84–2.05 | 1.13 | 0.73–1.77 | <0.001 |
| SFA | 30.69 | 3.25 | 28.87 | 2.62 | <0.001 |
| MUFA | 21.38 | 4.26 | 21.25 | 4.44 | 0.504 |
| PUFA | 42.25 | 4.43 | 43.66 | 5.41 | <0.001 |
| n-3 PUFA | 6.17 | 5.60–7.04 | 6.28 | 5.48–7.30 | 0.024 |
| n-6 PUFA | 36.04 | 5.00 | 37.37 | 4.60 | 0.010 |
| n-3/n-6 | 0.15 | 0.13–0.19 | 0.16 | 0.13–0.23 | 0.031 |
| SFA/PUFA | 0.81 | 0.63–0.92 | 0.68 | 0.60–0.82 | <0.001 |
QR quartile range, SFA saturated fatty acid, MUFA monounsaturated fatty acid, PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acid
a P value for difference between groups was tested by an unpaired t-test
Serum proportions of individual fatty acid and varimax rotation loadings of the major FA-factors
| Fatty acid (FA) | Proportionsa | Factor 1 | Factor 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14:0 | 1.69 (1.43–1.95) |
| −0.06 |
| 16:0 | 20.76 (2.60) |
| −0.04 |
| 18:0 | 6.42 (0.89) | 0.10 | 0.13 |
| 20:0 | 0.45 (0.29–0.73) | −0.04 | 0.29 |
| 22:0 | 0.41 (0.25) | −0.28 | 0.01 |
| 24:0 | 0.36 (0.11) | −0.26 | 0.13 |
| 16:1n-7 | 1.59 (0.84) |
| 0.16 |
| 18:1n-9 | 19.30 (3.83) | 0.35 | − |
| 24:1n-9 | 1.04 (0.76–1.38) | −0.02 | −0.02 |
| 18:2n-6 | 28.26 (5.31) | − | −0.19 |
| 18:3n-6 | 0.34 (0.22–0.48) |
| 0.31 |
| 20:3n-6 | 1.14 (0.31) |
| 0.29 |
| 20:4n-6 | 6.02 (1.61) | −0.25 | 0.37 |
| 18:3n-3 | 0.93 (0.37) | 0.17 | −0.23 |
| 20:5n-3 | 3.25 (1.23) | 0.03 |
|
| 22:5n-3 | 0.51 (0.24) | 0.31 |
|
| 22:6n-3 | 1.73 (0.62) | −0.20 |
|
| Eigenvalue | 3.20 | 1.95 | |
| The proportion of total variance (%) | 44.13 | 25.60 |
aData with a normal distribution are presented as mean (standard deviation), while the skewed data were expressed as the median (quartile range)
bValues in boldface were major factor loadings that contribute to identify Factor 1
cValues in boldface were major factor loadings that contribute to identify Factor 2
Adjusted blood pressure mean with 95 % confidence interval by tertiles of FA-factor scores in 2447 individuals
| Factor scores (Dominant FA) |
| Adjusted SBP Mean (95 % CI) | Adjusted DBP Mean (95 % CI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial modela | Model 1b | Model 2c | Initial modela | Model 1b | Model 2c | ||
| Factor 1(14:0, 16:0, 16:1n-7, 18:2n-6, 18:3n-6, 20:3n-6) | |||||||
| T1 (<−0.46) | 832 | 123.51 (123.07, 124.00) | 123.48 (122.97, 124.01) | 123.80 (122.26, 124.33) | 80.30 (80.12, 80.57) | 80.22 (79.85, 80.49) | 80.33 (80.06, 80.61) |
| T2 (−0.46–0.30) | 783 | 126.81 (126.31, 127.39) | 126.89 (126.34, 127.45) | 127.30 (126.30, 127.91) | 81.23 (80.02, 81.44) | 81.34 (81.07, 81.69) | 81.60 (81.30, 81.89) |
| T3 (≥ 0.30) | 832 | 130.33 (129.81, 130.88) | 130.55 (129.98, 132.23) | 131.11 (130.48, 131.75) | 82.12 (81.81, 82.33) | 82.24 (81.98, 82.54) | 82.58 (82.27, 82.98) |
|
| 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.016 | 0.019 | 0.038 | 0.030 | |
| Factor 2 (20:5n-3, 22:5n-3, 22:6n-3, 18:1n-9) | |||||||
| T1 (<−0.35) | 831 | 129.72 (129.17, 130.26) | 128.05 (127.46, 128.62) | 127.80 (127.28, 128.32) | 82.25 (82.05, 82.44) | 82.27 (82.02, 82.53) | 82.99 (82.59, 83.20) |
| T2 (−0.45–0.38) | 807 | 126.87 (126.28, 127.45) | 126.57 (126.01, 127.12) | 126.43 (125.94, 126.92) | 81.05 (80.86, 81.24) | 81.03 (80.78, 81.29) | 81.24 (80.95, 81.53) |
| T3 (≥ 0.38) | 809 | 125.87 (125.34, 126.40) | 126.36 (125.81, 126.90) | 126.40 (125.91, 126.88) | 80.12 (80.05, 80.34) | 80.46 (80.20, 80.72) | 79.84 (79.29, 80.35) |
|
| 0.101 | 0.782 | 0.804 | 0.026 | 0.042 | 0.037 | |
FA fatty acid, n number of subjects, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, CI confidence interval, T the upper tertiles, T the bottom tertiles
aInitial model was adjusted for age, gender, BMI and hypertension
bModel 1 was adjusted for covariates in the initial model plus smoking, alcohol intake, education, profession, exercise, and salt intake
cModel 2 was adjusted for covariates in the model 1 plus family history, heart rate, triglyceride, total cholesterol and fasting blood-glucose level
d P for trend was estimated by a multiple regression model, with ordinal numbers 0–2 assigned to tertile categories of each fatty acid