Literature DB >> 35201553

The modified prostate health index (PHI) outperforms PHI density in the detection of clinical prostate cancer within the PSA grey zone.

Haojie Chen1, Bowen Shi1, Yanyuan Wu1, Yuhang Qian1, Jiatong Zhou1, Xi Zhang2, Jie Ding3, Yongjiang Yu4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the accuracy of several volume and diameters modified prostate health index (mPHI) models with PHI density (PHID), PHI, and other prostate-specific antigen (PSA) derivatives in detecting PSA grey zone prostate cancer (PCa).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between August 2020 and September 2021, a consecutive cohort of 214 suspected PCa patients with elevated total PSA values ranged from 4.0 to 10.0 ng/mL were prospectively recruited and received PHI detections and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) measurements, followed by systematic prostate biopsies confirmation.
RESULTS: Among the 214 patients enrolled in the project, a total of 80 were diagnosed with PCa. In univariate analysis for the training cohort, the area under curve (AUC) of mPHI-2 [Formula: see text] was 0.8310, which outperformed PHID in identifying PSA grey zone PCa (P ≤ 0.0001) and showed the best net benefit in decision curve analysis (DCA). By a threshold of 0.2835, the sensitivity and specificity in the prediction of PCa were 78.9% and 90.3%, while the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 78.3% and 78.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our present single-center experience, the mPHI-2 risk predictor outperformed PHID or other classical parameters alone in the PCa detection with a grey zone PSA level in Asian males.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grey zone; Modified prostate health index; PSA; Predictive model; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35201553     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03113-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  25 in total

1.  Preoperative prostate-specific antigen isoform p2PSA and its derivatives, %p2PSA and prostate health index, predict pathologic outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Guazzoni; Massimo Lazzeri; Luciano Nava; Giovanni Lughezzani; Alessandro Larcher; Vincenzo Scattoni; Giulio Maria Gadda; Vittorio Bini; Andrea Cestari; Nicolò Maria Buffi; Massimo Freschi; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 20.096

2.  International variation in prostate cancer incidence and mortality rates.

Authors:  Melissa M Center; Ahmedin Jemal; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Elizabeth Ward; Jacques Ferlay; Otis Brawley; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Influence of study features and methods on overdiagnosis estimates in breast and prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Ruth Etzioni; Roman Gulati; Leslie Mallinger; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Second Stanford Conference on International Standardization of Prostate-Specific Antigen Immunoassays: September 1 and 2, 1994.

Authors:  T A Stamey
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoform p2PSA in combination with total PSA and free PSA improves diagnostic accuracy in prostate cancer detection.

Authors:  Flip H Jansen; Ron H N van Schaik; Joep Kurstjens; Wolfgang Horninger; Helmut Klocker; Jasmin Bektic; Mark F Wildhagen; Monique J Roobol; Chris H Bangma; Georg Bartsch
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Under diagnosis and over diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Theresa Graif; Stacy Loeb; Kimberly A Roehl; Sara N Gashti; Christopher Griffin; Xiaoying Yu; William J Catalona
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Detection of prostate cancer via biopsy in the Medicare-SEER population during the PSA era.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Elliott S Fisher; Daniel J Gottlieb; Michael J Barry
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Selection of optimal prostate specific antigen cutoffs for early detection of prostate cancer: receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  William J Catalona; M'liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Determinants of energy utilization in the activated myocardium.

Authors:  N R Alpert; L A Mulieri
Journal:  Fed Proc       Date:  1986-10

Review 10.  Epidemiology of prostate cancer in Asian countries.

Authors:  Takahiro Kimura; Shin Egawa
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.369

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modified Prostate Health Index Density Significantly Improves Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) Detection.

Authors:  Haojie Chen; Yuhang Qian; Yanyuan Wu; Bowen Shi; Jiatong Zhou; Fajun Qu; Zhengqin Gu; Jie Ding; Yongjiang Yu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 5.738

2.  Serum multi-cytokines screening identifies TRAIL and IL-10 as probable new biomarkers for prostate health index diagnostic utility adjustment in grey zone aggressive prostate cancer detection: A single-center data in China.

Authors:  Haojie Chen; Jiatong Zhou; Jia Luo; Yanyuan Wu; Yuhang Qian; Yuntian Shi; Fajun Qu; Bowen Shi; Jie Ding; Xingang Cui; Yongjiang Yu
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 8.786

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.