Literature DB >> 21486939

Thirty-day postoperative mortality after colorectal cancer surgery in England.

Eva J A Morris1, Elizabeth F Taylor, James D Thomas, Philip Quirke, Paul J Finan, Michel P Coleman, Bernard Rachet, David Forman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the variation in risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality for patients with colorectal cancer between hospital trusts within the English NHS.
DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional population-based study of data extracted from the National Cancer Data Repository.
SETTING: All providers of major colorectal cancer surgery within the English NHS. PARTICIPANTS: All 160,920 individuals who underwent major resection for colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1998 and 2006 in the English NHS. Main outcome measures National patterns of 30-day postoperative mortality were examined and logistic binary regression was used to study factors associated with death within 30 days of surgery. Funnel plots were used to show variation between trusts in risk-adjusted mortality.
RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality was 6.7% but decreased over time from 6.8% in 1998 to 5.8% in 2006. The largest reduction in mortality was seen in 2005 and 2006. Postoperative mortality increased with age (15.0% (95% CI 14.1% to 15.9%) for those aged >80 years), comorbidity (24.2% (95% CI 22.0% to 26.5%) for those with a Charlson comorbidity score ≥ 3), stage of disease (9.9% (95% CI 9.3% to 10.6%) for patients with Dukes' D disease), socioeconomic deprivation (7.8% (95% CI 7.2% to 8.4%) for residents of the most deprived quintile) and operative urgency (14.9% (95% CI 14.2% to 15.7%) for patients undergoing emergency resection). Risk-adjusted control charts showed that one trust had consistently significantly better outcomes and three had significantly worse outcomes than the population mean.
CONCLUSIONS: Significant variation in 30-day postoperative mortality following major colorectal cancer surgery existed between NHS hospitals in England throughout the period 1998-2006. Understanding the underlying causes of this variation between surgical providers will make it possible to identify and spread best practice, improve outcomes and, ultimately, reduce 30-day postoperative mortality following colorectal cancer surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21486939     DOI: 10.1136/gut.2010.232181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  81 in total

1.  Self-expandable Metal Stent as a Bridge to Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Safety and Oncological Outcomes.

Authors:  Marie Hanaoka; Taichi Ogo; Yudai Kawamura; Tomiyuki Miura; Tomoki Aburatani; Hitoshi Sugimoto; Naoaki Hoshino; Tsunehito Yauchi; Yoshinobu Nishioka; Tatsuyuki Kawano
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  Reduced perioperative death following laparoscopic colorectal resection: results of an international observational study.

Authors:  A Munasinghe; B Singh; N Mahmoud; M Joy; D C Chang; F Penninckx; O Faiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comorbidity and the risk of anastomotic leak in Chinese patients with colorectal cancer undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Yaohua Tian; Beibei Xu; Guopei Yu; Yan Li; Hui Liu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Heuristics and bias in rectal surgery.

Authors:  Ewan MacDermid; Christopher J Young; Susan J Moug; Robert G Anderson; Heather L Shepherd
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Multimorbidity and access to major cancer surgery at high-volume hospitals in a regionalized era.

Authors:  Chukwuemeka Ihemelandu; Chaoyi Zheng; Erin Hall; Russell C Langan; Nawar Shara; Lynt Johnson; Waddah Al-Refaie
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Variability in management of T1 colorectal cancer in Wales.

Authors:  U Khalid; M D Evans; G L Williams; J Hanson; M Davies
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 7.  Addressing unwarranted variations in colorectal cancer outcomes: a conceptual approach.

Authors:  Muralee Menon; Chris Cunningham; David Kerr
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  [Colorectal cancer: prevention and curative treatment in the elderly: An appraisal from the viewpoint of geriatric gastroenterology].

Authors:  G Kleber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Curative colorectal resections in patients aged 80 years and older: clinical characteristics, morbidity, mortality and risk factors.

Authors:  Ugochukwu Ihedioha; Gianpiero Gravante; Geraint Lloyd; Sam Sangal; Roberto Sorge; Baljit Singh; Sanjay Chaudhri
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer in elderly Chinese patients undergoing potentially curative surgery.

Authors:  Zuli Yang; Hao Chen; Yi Liao; Jun Xiang; Liang Kang; Lei Wang; Ji Cui; Guanfu Cai; Junsheng Peng; Ping Lan; Jianping Wang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.