Literature DB >> 25172920

Utilization of extracellular information before ligand-receptor binding reaches equilibrium expands and shifts the input dynamic range.

Alejandra C Ventura1, Alan Bush1, Gustavo Vasen1, Matías A Goldín1, Brianne Burkinshaw1, Nirveek Bhattacharjee2, Albert Folch2, Roger Brent3, Ariel Chernomoretz4, Alejandro Colman-Lerner5.   

Abstract

Cell signaling systems sense and respond to ligands that bind cell surface receptors. These systems often respond to changes in the concentration of extracellular ligand more rapidly than the ligand equilibrates with its receptor. We demonstrate, by modeling and experiment, a general "systems level" mechanism cells use to take advantage of the information present in the early signal, before receptor binding reaches a new steady state. This mechanism, pre-equilibrium sensing and signaling (PRESS), operates in signaling systems in which the kinetics of ligand-receptor binding are slower than the downstream signaling steps, and it typically involves transient activation of a downstream step. In the systems where it operates, PRESS expands and shifts the input dynamic range, allowing cells to make different responses to ligand concentrations so high as to be otherwise indistinguishable. Specifically, we show that PRESS applies to the yeast directional polarization in response to pheromone gradients. Consideration of preexisting kinetic data for ligand-receptor interactions suggests that PRESS operates in many cell signaling systems throughout biology. The same mechanism may also operate at other levels in signaling systems in which a slow activation step couples to a faster downstream step.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding kinetics; cellular signaling; dose–response

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25172920      PMCID: PMC4169960          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1322761111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  79 in total

1.  Courtship in S. cerevisiae: both cell types choose mating partners by responding to the strongest pheromone signal.

Authors:  C L Jackson; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Systems biology: model based evaluation and comparison of potential explanations for given biological data.

Authors:  Gunnar Cedersund; Jacob Roll
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.542

3.  Quantitative measurement of protein relocalization in live cells.

Authors:  Alan Bush; Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Covering a broad dynamic range: information processing at the erythropoietin receptor.

Authors:  Verena Becker; Marcel Schilling; Julie Bachmann; Ute Baumann; Andreas Raue; Thomas Maiwald; Jens Timmer; Ursula Klingmüller
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Formyl peptide chemotaxis receptors on the rat neutrophil: experimental evidence for negative cooperativity.

Authors:  W A Marasco; D E Feltner; P A Ward
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.429

6.  Single-cell quantification of molecules and rates using open-source microscope-based cytometry.

Authors:  Andrew Gordon; Alejandro Colman-Lerner; Tina E Chin; Kirsten R Benjamin; Richard C Yu; Roger Brent
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  Cannabinoid receptor localization in brain.

Authors:  M Herkenham; A B Lynn; M D Little; M R Johnson; L S Melvin; B R de Costa; K C Rice
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Kinetic analysis of chemotactic peptide receptor modulation.

Authors:  S H Zigmond; S J Sullivan; D A Lauffenburger
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Scaffold-mediated symmetry breaking by Cdc42p.

Authors:  Javier E Irazoqui; Amy S Gladfelter; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11-16       Impact factor: 28.824

10.  The interleukin 2 receptor. Functional consequences of its bimolecular structure.

Authors:  H M Wang; K A Smith
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1987-10-01       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  15 in total

1.  How long should a system be observed to obtain reliable concentration estimates from the measurement of fluctuations?

Authors:  Emiliano Pérez Ipiña; Silvina Ponce Dawson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Intrinsic limits of information transmission in biochemical signalling motifs.

Authors:  Ryan Suderman; Eric J Deeds
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Cluster Analysis of Endogenous HER2 and HER3 Receptors in SKBR3 Cells.

Authors:  Selene K Roberts; Michael Hirsch; Alexandra McStea; Laura C Zanetti-Domingues; David T Clarke; Jeroen Claus; Peter J Parker; Lin Wang; And Marisa L Martin-Fernandez
Journal:  Bio Protoc       Date:  2018-12-05

4.  Mitotic and pheromone-specific intrinsic polarization cues interfere with gradient sensing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Gustavo Vasen; Paula Dunayevich; Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Ratiometric GPCR signaling enables directional sensing in yeast.

Authors:  Nicholas T Henderson; Michael Pablo; Debraj Ghose; Manuella R Clark-Cotton; Trevin R Zyla; James Nolen; Timothy C Elston; Daniel J Lew
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Sensory input attenuation allows predictive sexual response in yeast.

Authors:  Alvaro Banderas; Mihaly Koltai; Alexander Anders; Victor Sourjik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Yeast GPCR signaling reflects the fraction of occupied receptors, not the number.

Authors:  Alan Bush; Gustavo Vasen; Andreas Constantinou; Paula Dunayevich; Inés Lucía Patop; Matías Blaustein; Alejandro Colman-Lerner
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 11.429

Review 8.  Spatial and temporal signal processing and decision making by MAPK pathways.

Authors:  Oguzhan Atay; Jan M Skotheim
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Testing the limits of gradient sensing.

Authors:  Vinal Lakhani; Timothy C Elston
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Single-cell profiling screen identifies microtubule-dependent reduction of variability in signaling.

Authors:  C Gustavo Pesce; Stefan Zdraljevic; William J Peria; Alan Bush; María Victoria Repetto; Daniel Rockwell; Richard C Yu; Alejandro Colman-Lerner; Roger Brent
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 11.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.