Evgeny V Mavrodiev1, Mario Martínez-Azorín2, Peter Dranishnikov3, Manuel B Crespo4. 1. Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. 2. Institute of Plant Science, Karl-Franzens University, Graz, Austria; CIBIO (Institute of Biodiversity), University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain. 3. Buchholz High School, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. 4. CIBIO (Institute of Biodiversity), University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iris L. s.l. is one of the most diverse and well-known genera in the Asparagales, with approximately 250-300 circumscribed species and significant economic impact. The taxonomy of the genus has suffered dramatic changes in the last century, particularly in the last decades after the application of molecular techniques. As a result several contrasting systematic arrangements are currently available to taxonomists. Many genera that were split from Iris s.str. in the past, on the basis of morphology (e.g., Hermodactylus, Iridodictyum, Juno, Pardanthopsis, and Xiphion, among others), are now a priori re-included in a very widely circumscribed Iris s.l. (incl. Belamcanda). This resulted in a more heterogeneous genus that is more difficult to define on morphological grounds. Testing congruence between taxonomic treatments and the results of recent molecular studies of Iris has never been performed, mostly due to the lack of proper taxonomic context. RESULTS: We generated several conventional phylogenies for Iris & outgroups using extensive sampling of taxa (187) and characters (10 plastid loci). We demonstrate that the natural history of Iris, written either as conventional molecular phylogenies or, if viewing in the context of the comparative approach, as a nested most parsimonious hierarchy of patterns, appear to be fully congruent with the narrow taxonomical treatment of the genus, restricted to the rhizomatous "bearded" taxa. The resulting topologies place Belamcanda, Pardanthopsis, and Gattenhofia as sisters to Iris s.str. and genus Siphonostylis as sister to Iris s.l. CONCLUSION: The present study clearly justifies the splitting of Iris s.l. into at least 23 genera, 18 of which have already been accepted in the past by numerous authorities. These genera are characterized by unique combinations of partly overlapping morphological characters and biogeography. Moreover, nearly the same entities, which we here recognize at a generic rank, were for centuries frequently referred to by horticulturists as "working-name" groups.
BACKGROUND: Iris L. s.l. is one of the most diverse and well-known genera in the Asparagales, with approximately 250-300 circumscribed species and significant economic impact. The taxonomy of the genus has suffered dramatic changes in the last century, particularly in the last decades after the application of molecular techniques. As a result several contrasting systematic arrangements are currently available to taxonomists. Many genera that were split from Iris s.str. in the past, on the basis of morphology (e.g., Hermodactylus, Iridodictyum, Juno, Pardanthopsis, and Xiphion, among others), are now a priori re-included in a very widely circumscribed Iris s.l. (incl. Belamcanda). This resulted in a more heterogeneous genus that is more difficult to define on morphological grounds. Testing congruence between taxonomic treatments and the results of recent molecular studies of Iris has never been performed, mostly due to the lack of proper taxonomic context. RESULTS: We generated several conventional phylogenies for Iris & outgroups using extensive sampling of taxa (187) and characters (10 plastid loci). We demonstrate that the natural history of Iris, written either as conventional molecular phylogenies or, if viewing in the context of the comparative approach, as a nested most parsimonious hierarchy of patterns, appear to be fully congruent with the narrow taxonomical treatment of the genus, restricted to the rhizomatous "bearded" taxa. The resulting topologies place Belamcanda, Pardanthopsis, and Gattenhofia as sisters to Iris s.str. and genus Siphonostylis as sister to Iris s.l. CONCLUSION: The present study clearly justifies the splitting of Iris s.l. into at least 23 genera, 18 of which have already been accepted in the past by numerous authorities. These genera are characterized by unique combinations of partly overlapping morphological characters and biogeography. Moreover, nearly the same entities, which we here recognize at a generic rank, were for centuries frequently referred to by horticulturists as "working-name" groups.
Authors: Thomas J Givnish; J Chris Pires; Sean W Graham; Marc A McPherson; Linda M Prince; Thomas B Patterson; Hardeep S Rai; Eric H Roalson; Timothy M Evans; William J Hahn; Kendra C Millam; Alan W Meerow; Mia Molvray; Paul J Kores; Heath E O'Brien; Jocelyn C Hall; W John Kress; Kenneth J Sytsma Journal: Proc Biol Sci Date: 2005-07-22 Impact factor: 5.349
Authors: Andrew Matthews; Katie Emelianova; Abubakar A Hatimy; Michael Chester; Jaume Pellicer; Khawaja Shafique Ahmad; Maité S Guignard; Germinal Rouhan; Douglas E Soltis; Pamela S Soltis; Ilia J Leitch; Andrew R Leitch; Evgeny V Mavrodiev; Richard J A Buggs Journal: AoB Plants Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 3.276