Literature DB >> 25170243

Environmental Safety of the Use of Major Surfactant Classes in North America.

Christina Cowan-Ellsberry1, Scott Belanger2, Philip Dorn3, Scott Dyer2, Drew McAvoy4, Hans Sanderson5, Donald Versteeg2, Darci Ferrer6, Kathleen Stanton6.   

Abstract

This paper brings together over 250 published and unpublished studies on the environmental properties, fate, and toxicity of the four major, high-volume surfactant classes and relevant feedstocks. The surfactants and feedstocks covered include alcohol sulfate or alcohol sulfate (AS), alcohol ethoxysulfate (AES), linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS), alcohol ethoxylate (AE), and long-chain alcohol (LCOH). These chemicals are used in a wide range of personal care and cleaning products. To date, this is the most comprehensive report on these substance's chemical structures, use, and volume information, physical/chemical properties, environmental fate properties such as biodegradation and sorption, monitoring studies through sewers, wastewater treatment plants and eventual release to the environment, aquatic and sediment toxicity, and bioaccumulation information. These data are used to illustrate the process for conducting both prospective and retrospective risk assessments for large-volume chemicals and categories of chemicals with wide dispersive use. Prospective risk assessments of AS, AES, AE, LAS, and LCOH demonstrate that these substances, although used in very high volume and widely released to the aquatic environment, have no adverse impact on the aquatic or sediment environments at current levels of use. The retrospective risk assessments of these same substances have clearly demonstrated that the conclusions of the prospective risk assessments are valid and confirm that these substances do not pose a risk to the aquatic or sediment environments. This paper also highlights the many years of research that the surfactant and cleaning products industry has supported, as part of their environmental sustainability commitment, to improve environmental tools, approaches, and develop innovative methods appropriate to address environmental properties of personal care and cleaning product chemicals, many of which have become approved international standard methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ecotoxicity; environmental exposure; risk assessment

Year:  2014        PMID: 25170243      PMCID: PMC4130171          DOI: 10.1080/10739149.2013.803777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 1064-3389            Impact factor:   12.561


  84 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; J S Jaworska
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; W Slob
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.291

3.  Removal and environmental exposure of alcohol ethoxylates in US sewage treatment.

Authors:  S W Morrall; J C Dunphy; M L Cano; A Evans; D C McAvoy; B P Price; W S Eckhoff
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 6.291

4.  Appraisal of a reference toxicant for estimating the quality of oyster larvae.

Authors:  R D Cardwell; C E Woelke; M I Carr; E Sanborn
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Occurrence and weight-of-evidence risk assessment of alkyl sulfates, alkyl ethoxysulfates, and linear alkylbenzene sulfonates (LAS) in river water and sediments.

Authors:  Hans Sanderson; Scott D Dyer; Bradford B Price; Allen M Nielsen; Remi van Compernolle; Martin Selby; Kathleen Stanton; Alex Evans; Michael Ciarlo; Richard Sedlak
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 7.963

6.  The fate of linear alcohol ethoxylates during activated sludge sewage treatment.

Authors:  N S Battersby; A J Sherren; R N Bumpus; R Eagle; I K Molade
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  What contribution do detergent fatty alcohols make to sewage discharges and the marine environment?

Authors:  Stephen M Mudge; Wolfram Meier-Augenstein; Charles Eadsforth; Paul DeLeo
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2010-09-06

8.  Chronic toxicity of sediment-associated linear alkylbenzene sulphonates (LAS) to freshwater benthic organisms.

Authors:  S D W Comber; A U Conrad; S Höss; S Webb; S Marshall
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Responses of periphyton and invertebrates to a tetradecyl-pentadecyl sulfate mixture in stream mesocosms.

Authors:  Scott E Belanger; David M Lee; John W Bowling; Ellen M LeBlanc
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.742

10.  Surfactants and the environment.

Authors:  P A Gilbert; R Pettigrew
Journal:  Int J Cosmet Sci       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.970

View more
  15 in total

1.  Ecotoxicological characterization of polyoxyethylene glycerol ester non-ionic surfactants and their mixtures with anionic and non-ionic surfactants.

Authors:  Francisco Ríos; Alejandro Fernández-Arteaga; Manuela Lechuga; Mercedes Fernández-Serrano
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Nonionic Ethoxylated Surfactants Induce Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Cells.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Erin M Kollitz; Patrick Lee Ferguson; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Characterization and evaluation of avermectin solid nanodispersion prepared by microprecipitation and lyophilisation techniques.

Authors:  Bo Cui; Chunxin Wang; Xiang Zhao; Junwei Yao; Zhanghua Zeng; Yan Wang; Changjiao Sun; Guoqiang Liu; Haixin Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Design and performance optimisation of detergent product containing binary mixture of anionic-nonionic surfactants.

Authors:  Kai Cong Cheng; Zhi Sheng Khoo; Newton Well Lo; Wei Jie Tan; Nishanth G Chemmangattuvalappil
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-05-06

5.  Simulations Study of Single-Component and Mixed n-Alkyl-PEG Micelles.

Authors:  Maisa Vuorte; Jukka Määttä; Maria Sammalkorpi
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  Fungal biosurfactants, from nature to biotechnological product: bioprospection, production and potential applications.

Authors:  André Felipe da Silva; Ibrahim M Banat; Admir José Giachini; Diogo Robl
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.210

7.  Stability and Biological Activity Evaluation of Chlorantraniliprole Solid Nanodispersions Prepared by High Pressure Homogenization.

Authors:  Bo Cui; Lei Feng; Chunxin Wang; Dongsheng Yang; Manli Yu; Zhanghua Zeng; Yan Wang; Changjiao Sun; Xiang Zhao; Haixin Cui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Microorganisms populating the water-related indoor biome.

Authors:  Monika Novak Babič; Cene Gostinčar; Nina Gunde-Cimerman
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Assessment of ecological hazards and environmental fate of disinfectant quaternary ammonium compounds.

Authors:  Paul C DeLeo; Carolyn Huynh; Mala Pattanayek; Katherine Clark Schmid; Nathan Pechacek
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 6.291

Review 10.  Marine derived biosurfactants: a vast potential future resource.

Authors:  Lakshmi Tripathi; Victor U Irorere; Roger Marchant; Ibrahim M Banat
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 2.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.