Literature DB >> 25168028

Patient- and provider-reported information about transplantation and subsequent waitlisting.

Megan L Salter1, Babak Orandi2, Mara A McAdams-DeMarco3, Andrew Law3, Lucy A Meoni4, Bernard G Jaar5, Stephen M Sozio6, Wen Hong Linda Kao7, Rulan S Parekh8, Dorry L Segev9.   

Abstract

Because informed consent requires discussion of alternative treatments, proper consent for dialysis should incorporate discussion about other renal replacement options including kidney transplantation (KT). Accordingly, dialysis providers are required to indicate KT provision of information (KTPI) on CMS Form-2728; however, provider-reported KTPI does not necessarily imply adequate provision of information. Furthermore, the effect of KTPI on pursuit of KT remains unclear. We compared provider-reported KTPI (Form-2728) with patient-reported KTPI (in-person survey of whether a nephrologist or dialysis staff had discussed KT) in a prospective ancillary study of 388 hemodialysis initiates. KTPI was reported by both patient and provider for 56.2% of participants, by provider only for 27.8%, by patient only for 8.3%, and by neither for 7.7%. Among participants with provider-reported KTPI, older age was associated with lack of patient-reported KTPI. Linkage with the Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients showed that 20.9% of participants were subsequently listed for KT. Patient-reported KTPI was independently associated with a 2.95-fold (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.54 to 5.66; P=0.001) higher likelihood of KT listing, whereas provider-reported KTPI was not associated with listing (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.60 to 2.32; P=0.62). Our findings suggest that patient perception of KTPI is more important for KT listing than provider-reported KTPI. Patient-reported and provider-reported KTPI should be collected for quality assessment in dialysis centers because factors associated with discordance between these metrics might inform interventions to improve this process.
Copyright © 2014 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CMS Form 2728; age disparities; listing; provision of information; transplantation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25168028      PMCID: PMC4243357          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2013121298

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  25 in total

1.  Different methods to calculate effect estimates in cross-sectional studies. A comparison between prevalence odds ratio and prevalence ratio.

Authors:  T Behrens; D Taeger; J Wellmann; U Keil
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.176

2.  Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences.

Authors:  Donna Spiegelman; Ellen Hertzmark
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Quality of life in adult transplant recipients more than 15 years after kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Michael Neipp; Behya Karavul; Steffan Jackobs; Andreas Meyer zu Vilsendorf; Nicolas Richter; Thomas Becker; Anke Schwarz; Juergen Klempnauer
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of audio-visual information aids for informed consent for invasive healthcare procedures in clinical practice.

Authors:  Elinor H Farrell; Robert N Whistance; Katie Phillips; Benjamin Morgan; Katherine Savage; Victoria Lewis; Mark Kelly; Jane M Blazeby; Paul Kinnersley; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-08-30

5.  Recall of informed consent information by healthy volunteers in clinical trials.

Authors:  P Fortun; J West; L Chalkley; A Shonde; C Hawkey
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2008-05-16

6.  Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; V B Ashby; E L Milford; A O Ojo; R E Ettenger; L Y Agodoa; P J Held; F K Port
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Factors affecting quality of informed consent.

Authors:  C Lavelle-Jones; D J Byrne; P Rice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-03

Review 8.  Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents.

Authors:  Michael Jefford; Rosemary Moore
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Panduranga S Rao; Robert M Merion; Valarie B Ashby; Friedrich K Port; Robert A Wolfe; Liise K Kayler
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Kidney transplantation in the elderly: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Sarbjit V Jassal; Murray D Krahn; Gary Naglie; Jeffrey S Zaltzman; Janet M Roscoe; Edward H Cole; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.121

View more
  26 in total

1.  The Other Half of Informed Consent: Transplant Education Practices in Dialysis Centers.

Authors:  Lauren M Kucirka; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Dialysis Facility Transplant Philosophy and Access to Kidney Transplantation in the Southeast.

Authors:  Jennifer Gander; Teri Browne; Laura Plantinga; Stephen O Pastan; Leighann Sauls; Jenna Krisher; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.754

3.  How important is social support in determining patients' suitability for transplantation? Results from a National Survey of Transplant Clinicians.

Authors:  Keren Ladin; Joanna Emerson; Zeeshan Butt; Elisa J Gordon; Douglas W Hanto; Jennifer Perloff; Norman Daniels; Tara A Lavelle
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Using Patient-Reported Measures in Dialysis Clinics.

Authors:  John D Peipert; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 8.237

5.  Assessing Transplant Education Practices in Dialysis Centers: Comparing Educator Reported and Medicare Data.

Authors:  Amy D Waterman; John D Peipert; Christina J Goalby; Katrina M Dinkel; Huiling Xiao; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Asking dialysis patients about what they were told: a new strategy for improving access to kidney transplantation?

Authors:  Mark Unruh; Mary Amanda Dew
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Patients prioritize waitlist over posttransplant outcomes when evaluating kidney transplant centers.

Authors:  Syed Ali Husain; Corey Brennan; Ariane Michelson; Demetra Tsapepas; Rachel E Patzer; Jesse D Schold; Sumit Mohan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  What patients and members of their support networks ask about transplant program data.

Authors:  Cory R Schaffhausen; Marilyn J Bruin; Daryl Chesley; Maureen McBride; Jon J Snyder; Bertram L Kasiske; Ajay K Israni
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  Referral for Kidney Transplantation and Indicators of Quality of Dialysis Care: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Laura C Plantinga; Stephen O Pastan; Adam S Wilk; Jenna Krisher; Laura Mulloy; Eric M Gibney; Rachel E Patzer
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2016-11-20       Impact factor: 8.860

10.  Frailty and Cognitive Function in Incident Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Jingwen Tan; Megan L Salter; Alden Gross; Lucy A Meoni; Bernard G Jaar; Wen-Hong Linda Kao; Rulan S Parekh; Dorry L Segev; Stephen M Sozio
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.