Literature DB >> 8490411

Factors affecting quality of informed consent.

C Lavelle-Jones1, D J Byrne, P Rice, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factors influencing quality of informed consent.
DESIGN: Prospective study comprising interviews with patients and patients' completing standard questionnaires.
SETTING: Academic surgical unit of large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: 265 patients undergoing intrathoracic, intraperitoneal, and vascular surgical procedures. Of these patients, 192 have been followed up for six months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients' recall of information at various points in the study; this score was compared by age, provision of written information, cognitive function, intelligence quotient (IQ), mood state and personality traits, and health locus of control.
RESULTS: The patients were best informed immediately after signing the consent form and from then on recall of information deteriorated. A total of 172/250 (69%) patients admitted to not reading the consent form before signing it. Old age adversely affected recall of information at all assessment points. Impaired cognitive function reduced information recall only during the stay in hospital. Patients with above average IQs handled information better than those with a lower IQ except immediately after the signing of consent forms. Patients with an internal locus of health control (that is, those who believed their health to be in their own control) were better informed than those with an external locus of health control. Operation information cards improved recall only on the day of discharge.
CONCLUSION: Elderly patients and patients with below average IQ, impaired cognitive functions, and an external locus of control have poor information recall. Written information may be more useful if given before admission to hospital.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8490411      PMCID: PMC1677345          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.306.6882.885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  A method for decreasing patients' medication errors.

Authors:  P Ley; V K Jain; C E Skilbeck
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 7.723

2.  Informed consent: can we educate patients?

Authors:  G Askew; K W Pearson; D Cryer
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1990-10

3.  How informed is signed consent?

Authors:  D J Byrne; A Napier; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-03-19

4.  Informed consent -- why are its goals imperfectly realized?

Authors:  B R Cassileth; R V Zupkis; K Sutton-Smith; V March
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-04-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  No news is bad news: patients' views about communication in hospital.

Authors:  M Reynolds
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-06-24

6.  Doctor-patient communication in surgery.

Authors:  J Richards; P McDonald
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Satisfying patients' needs for surgical information.

Authors:  M H Edwards
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.939

  7 in total
  66 in total

1.  After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-16

2.  After Bristol: putting patients at the centre.

Authors:  Angela Coulter
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-06

Review 3.  Informed consent for clinical treatment.

Authors:  Daniel E Hall; Allan V Prochazka; Aaron S Fink
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Consent for surgery: time for a standardized NHS consent checklist.

Authors:  Rob Ritchie; John Reynard
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Tattoo: a navigational tool, a lighthouse for biomolecular level precision in surgical endoscopy. Newton's apple or Eve's?

Authors:  Brij B Agarwal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  How to do it. Get patients' consent to enter clinical trials.

Authors:  E Wager; P J Tooley; M B Emanuel; S F Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-16

Review 8.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Beyond literacy and numeracy in patient provider communication: focus groups suggest roles for empowerment, provider attitude and language.

Authors:  Doug Brugge; Timothy Edgar; Kelly George; Janette Heung; M Barton Laws
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-09-21       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Patients' perception of quality of pre-operative informed consent in athens, Greece: a pilot study.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Patrick D Akrivos; Vangelis G Alexiou; Vasilios Saridakis; Theofanis Moutos; George Peppas; Barbara K Kondilis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.