Literature DB >> 25166882

Estimating the proportion of all observed birth defects occurring in pregnancies terminated by a second-trimester abortion.

Elisabeth Svensson1, Vera Ehrenstein, Mette Nørgaard, Leiv Sigmund Bakketeig, Kenneth J Rothman, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Lars Pedersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prenatal termination of pregnancy may underestimate risks or cause bias in epidemiological studies of birth defects if such studies measure only defects diagnosed postnatally. We aimed to estimate the proportion of all fetuses with birth defects terminated in the second trimester of pregnancy-overall and for specific defects.
METHODS: The study comprised all pregnancies ending in a singleton birth, miscarriage, or termination of pregnancy for which health care services were sought, as recorded in Danish medical registries between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2011.
RESULTS: Of the 420,090 pregnancies, 307,637 fetuses survived until gestational week 12 or beyond; of these, 296,373 (96%) ended in a live birth or stillbirth and 11,264 (4%) ended in a second-trimester termination. The prevalence of birth defects among live births and stillbirths was 3% (9,790/296,373); the corresponding prevalence among second-trimester-terminated pregnancies was 14% (1,563/11,264). Although only 4% of all pregnancies ended in a second-trimester termination, 14% (1,563/11,353) of pregnancies with birth defects were ended by a second-trimester termination. The groups of birth defects with the highest proportion of second-trimester terminations were defects of the nervous system (347/740; 48%) and abdominal wall (58/149; 39%). For many types of birth defects, however, that proportion was less than 10%.
CONCLUSION: The proportion of terminated pregnancies carrying birth defects is considerably greater than the corresponding proportion for pregnancies that end as live births or stillbirths. The proportion of birth defects unobserved at birth due to second-trimester terminations depends on type of defect and lethality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25166882     DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  12 in total

1.  Are epidemiological approaches suitable to study risk/preventive factors for human birth defects?

Authors:  Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Anna Sara Oberg
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-03

2.  Ascertaining the Burden of Birth Defects.

Authors:  Lorraine F Yeung; Robert J Berry; Cynthia A Moore
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  β-Blocker Use in Pregnancy and the Risk for Congenital Malformations: An International Cohort Study.

Authors:  Brian T Bateman; Uffe Heide-Jørgensen; Kristjana Einarsdóttir; Anders Engeland; Kari Furu; Mika Gissler; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Helle Kieler; Anna-Maria Lahesmaa-Korpinen; Helen Mogun; Mette Nørgaard; Johan Reutfors; Randi Selmer; Krista F Huybrechts; Helga Zoega
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  The Impact of Technology on the Diagnosis of Congenital Malformations.

Authors:  Loreen Straub; Krista F Huybrechts; Brian T Bateman; Helen Mogun; Kathryn J Gray; Lewis B Holmes; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Use of antibiotics during pregnancy and the risk of major congenital malformations: a population based cohort study.

Authors:  Flory T Muanda; Odile Sheehy; Anick Bérard
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Quantification of selection bias in studies of risk factors for birth defects among livebirths.

Authors:  Dominique Heinke; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Paige L Williams; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Marlene Anderka; Sarah C Fisher; Tania A Desrosiers; Gary M Shaw; Paul A Romitti; Mark A Canfield; Mahsa M Yazdy
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.103

8.  Linkage between the Danish National Health Service Prescription Database, the Danish Fetal Medicine Database, and other Danish registries as a tool for the study of drug safety in pregnancy.

Authors:  Lars H Pedersen; Olav B Petersen; Mette Nørgaard; Charlotte Ekelund; Lars Pedersen; Ann Tabor; Henrik T Sørensen
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.790

9.  Congenital Anomalies in Contaminated Sites: A Multisite Study in Italy.

Authors:  Michele Santoro; Fabrizio Minichilli; Anna Pierini; Gianni Astolfi; Lucia Bisceglia; Pietro Carbone; Susanna Conti; Gabriella Dardanoni; Ivano Iavarone; Paolo Ricci; Gioacchino Scarano; Fabrizio Bianchi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Epidemiology of Birth Defects in Eastern China and the Associated Risk Factors.

Authors:  Qiao-Qiao Wang; Cha-Ying He; Jin Mei; Yi-Lin Xu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2022-01-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.