Literature DB >> 31241162

The Impact of Technology on the Diagnosis of Congenital Malformations.

Loreen Straub1, Krista F Huybrechts1, Brian T Bateman1,2, Helen Mogun1, Kathryn J Gray3, Lewis B Holmes4,5,6, Sonia Hernandez-Diaz7.   

Abstract

As technology improves and becomes more widely accessible, more subclinical congenital malformations are being detected. Using a cohort of 1,780,156 pregnant women and their offspring nested in the 2000-2013 US Medicaid Analytic eXtract, we contrasted time trends in malformations which do not necessarily present with overt clinical symptoms early in life and are more likely to be diagnosed via imaging (secundum atrial septal defect, patent ductus arteriosus, ventricular septal defect, pulmonary artery anomalies, pulmonary valve stenosis, hydrocephalus) with trends in malformations that are unlikely to escape clinical diagnosis (tetralogy of Fallot, coarctation of the aorta, transposition of the great vessels, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, oral cleft, abdominal wall defect). Logistic regression was used to account for trends in risk factors while assessing the impact of increased screening intensity. Prevalence of the diagnosis of secundum atrial septal defect rose from 2.3‰ in 2000-2001 to 7.5‰ in 2012-2013, of patent ductus arteriosus from 1.9‰ to 4.1‰, and of ventricular septal defect from 3.6‰ to 4.5‰. Trends were not explained by changes in the prevalence of risk factors but were attenuated when accounting for screening tests. The other malformations showed no temporal trends. Findings suggest that increased screening partially explains the observed increase in diagnosis of milder cases of select common malformations.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth defects; congenital malformations; prevalence; screening; time trends

Year:  2019        PMID: 31241162      PMCID: PMC6825822          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwz153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  45 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of ostium secundum atrial septal defect by M-mode fetal echocardiography.

Authors:  M Salih; L C Demirel; G Kurtay
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  [Severe hypoplastic left heart syndrome: palliative care after prenatal diagnosis].

Authors:  C Noseda; T Mialet-Marty; A Basquin; I Letourneur; I Bertorello; F Charlot; G Le Bouar; P Bétrémieux
Journal:  Arch Pediatr       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 1.180

3.  Congenital anomalies are an independent risk factor for neonatal morbidity and perinatal mortality in preterm birth.

Authors:  Y Linhart; A Bashiri; E Maymon; I Shoham-Vardi; B Furman; H Vardi; M Mazor
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Trends in prenatal diagnosis, pregnancy termination, and perinatal mortality of newborns with congenital heart disease in France, 1983-2000: a population-based evaluation.

Authors:  Babak Khoshnood; Catherine De Vigan; Véronique Vodovar; Janine Goujard; Anne Lhomme; Damien Bonnet; François Goffinet
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Patent ductus arteriosus and ventricular septal defect: trends in reported frequency.

Authors:  C E Anderson; L D Edmonds; J D Erickson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Including prenatal diagnoses in birth defects monitoring: Experience of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program.

Authors:  Janet D Cragan; Suzanne M Gilboa
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2009-01

7.  Outcome after prenatal diagnosis of the hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

Authors:  L D Allan; H D Apfel; B F Printz
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Antidepressant use in pregnancy and the risk of cardiac defects.

Authors:  Krista F Huybrechts; Kristin Palmsten; Jerry Avorn; Lee S Cohen; Lewis B Holmes; Jessica M Franklin; Helen Mogun; Raisa Levin; Mary Kowal; Soko Setoguchi; Sonia Hernández-Díaz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  T Todros; E Capuzzo; P Gaglioti
Journal:  Images Paediatr Cardiol       Date:  2001-04

Review 10.  Congenital Pulmonary Artery Anomalies: A Review and Approach to Classification.

Authors:  Leslie E Hirsig; Priya G Sharma; Nupur Verma; Dhanashree A Rajderkar
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2018-07-31
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Deciphering congenital anomalies for the next generation.

Authors:  Monica H Wojcik; Pankaj B Agrawal
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud       Date:  2020-10-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.