Literature DB >> 25166753

Genetic parameters for carcass weight, conformation and fat in five beef cattle breeds.

A Kause1, L Mikkola1, I Strandén1, K Sirkko2.   

Abstract

Profitability of beef production can be increased by genetically improving carcass traits. To construct breeding value evaluations for carcass traits, breed-specific genetic parameters were estimated for carcass weight, carcass conformation and carcass fat in five beef cattle breeds in Finland (Hereford, Aberdeen Angus, Simmental, Charolais and Limousin). Conformation and fat were visually scored using the EUROP carcass classification. Each breed was separately analyzed using a multitrait animal model. A total of 6879-19 539 animals per breed had phenotypes. For the five breeds, heritabilities were moderate for carcass weight (h 2=0.39 to 0.48, s.e.=0.02 to 0.04) and slightly lower for conformation (h 2=0.30 to 0.44, s.e.=0.02 to 0.04) and carcass fat (h 2=0.29 to 0.44, s.e.=0.02 to 0.04). The genetic correlation between carcass weight and conformation was favorable in all breeds (r G=0.37 to 0.53, s.e.=0.04 to 0.05), heavy carcasses being genetically more conformed. The phenotypic correlation between carcass weight and carcass fat was moderately positive in all breeds (r P=0.21 to 0.32), implying that increasing carcass weight was related to increasing fat levels. The respective genetic correlation was the strongest in Hereford (r G=0.28, s.e.=0.05) and Angus (r G=0.15, s.e.=0.05), the two small body-sized British breeds with the lowest conformation and the highest fat level. The correlation was weaker in the other breeds (r G=0.08 to 0.14). For Hereford, Angus and Simmental, more conformed carcasses were phenotypically fatter (r P=0.11 to 0.15), but the respective genetic correlations were close to zero (r G=-0.05 to 0.04). In contrast, in the two large body-sized and muscular French breeds, the genetic correlation between conformation and fat was negative and the phenotypic correlation was close to zero or negative (Charolais: r G=-0.18, s.e.=0.06, r P=0.02; Limousin: r G=-0.56, s.e.=0.04, r P=-0.13). The results indicate genetic variation for the genetic improvement of the carcass traits, favorable correlations for the simultaneous improvement of carcass weight and conformation in all breeds, and breed differences in the correlations of carcass fat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25166753     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114001992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  9 in total

1.  Potential exists to change, through breeding, the yield of individual primal carcass cuts in cattle without increasing overall carcass weight1.

Authors:  Michelle M Judge; Thierry Pabiou; Jessica Murphy; Stephen B Conroy; P J Hegarty; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Linear classification scores in beef cattle as predictors of genetic merit for individual carcass primal cut yields1.

Authors:  Donagh P Berry; Thierry Pabiou; Rory Fanning; Ross D Evans; Michelle M Judge
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genetic parameters for carcass and ultrasound traits in Hereford and admixed Simmental beef cattle: Accuracy of evaluating carcass traits.

Authors:  H Su; B Golden; L Hyde; S Sanders; D Garrick
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genetic covariance components within and among linear type traits differ among contrasting beef cattle breeds.

Authors:  Jennifer L Doyle; Donagh P Berry; Siobhan W Walsh; Roel F Veerkamp; Ross D Evans; Tara R Carthy
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  The achievement of a given carcass specification is under moderate genetic control in cattle.

Authors:  David Kenny; Michelle M Judge; Roy D Sleator; Craig P Murphy; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Animal-level factors associated with the achievement of desirable specifications in Irish beef carcasses graded using the EUROP classification system.

Authors:  David Kenny; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Michelle M Judge; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Genotype by Environment Interaction and Selection Response for Milk Yield Traits and Conformation in a Local Cattle Breed Using a Reaction Norm Approach.

Authors:  Cristina Sartori; Francesco Tiezzi; Nadia Guzzo; Enrico Mancin; Beniamino Tuliozi; Roberto Mantovani
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  Selection Response Due to Different Combination of Antagonistic Milk, Beef, and Morphological Traits in the Alpine Grey Cattle Breed.

Authors:  Enrico Mancin; Cristina Sartori; Nadia Guzzo; Beniamino Tuliozi; Roberto Mantovani
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Differential responsiveness of Holstein and Angus dermal fibroblasts to LPS challenge occurs without major differences in the methylome.

Authors:  Aimee L Benjamin; Benjamin B Green; Brian A Crooker; Stephanie D McKay; David E Kerr
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 3.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.