Literature DB >> 32516387

Animal-level factors associated with the achievement of desirable specifications in Irish beef carcasses graded using the EUROP classification system.

David Kenny1,2, Craig P Murphy2, Roy D Sleator2, Michelle M Judge1, Ross D Evans3, Donagh P Berry1.   

Abstract

Beef carcasses in Europe are classified on measures of carcass weight, conformation, and fat cover. These measurements provide the basis for payment to producers, with financial penalties for carcasses that do not conform to desirable characteristics. The objective of the present study was to identify animal-level factors associated with the achievement of a desirable carcass weight, conformation score, fat score, and age at harvest, as stipulated by Irish beef processors in accordance with the EUROP carcass classification system. The stipulated specifications were a EUROP conformation score ≥O=, a carcass weight between 270 and 380 kg, a EUROP fat score between 2+ and 4=, and an age at harvest ≤ 30 mo. In the present study, 59% of cattle failed to achieve at least one of these desired specifications. The logit of the probability of achieving the desired specifications was estimated using multivariable logistic regression and carcass data from 4,717,989 cattle finished and harvested in Ireland between the years 2003 and 2017. In comparison to beef-origin carcasses and after accounting for breed differences, the likelihood of dairy-origin carcasses achieving the desired age, conformation, fat, and weight specifications was 0.97, 0.88, 1.14, and 1.05, respectively. In comparison to heifer carcasses, the odds ratio (OR) of bull and steer carcasses simultaneously achieving all of the desired specifications (i.e. the overall specification) was 0.35 and 0.95, respectively. Additionally, after accounting for breed differences, heifers from the dairy herd were half as likely as heifers from the beef herd to achieve the overall specification, whereas the odds of dairy-origin bulls (OR = 3.46) and steers (OR = 2.41) achieving the overall specification was greater than that of their respective beef-origin counterparts. Finally, cattle with a greater breed proportion of Angus were most likely to achieve the overall specification. Results from the present study could provide a deeper understanding as to why animals fail to achieve desirable carcass specifications and could be implemented into the management decisions made on farm to ensure that the supply of beef carcasses that achieve the desired metrics is maximized.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beef classification; carcass grading; carcass quality; carcass yield

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32516387      PMCID: PMC7333216          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  31 in total

1.  Predicting beef carcass meat, fat and bone proportions from carcass conformation and fat scores or hindquarter dissection.

Authors:  S B Conroy; M J Drennan; M McGee; M G Keane; D A Kenny; D P Berry
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The value of muscular and skeletal scores in the live animal and carcass classification scores as indicators of carcass composition in cattle.

Authors:  M J Drennan; M McGee; M G Keane
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Genetic variation in wholesale carcass cuts predicted from digital images in cattle.

Authors:  T Pabiou; W F Fikse; P R Amer; A R Cromie; A Näsholm; D P Berry
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of feeding intensity and time on feed on performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Simmental bulls.

Authors:  A S Sami; C Augustini; F J Schwarz
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Applying breeding objectives to dairy cattle improvement.

Authors:  J C Dekkers; J P Gibson
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Effect of prepubertal body weight gain and breed on carcass composition at puberty in beef heifers.

Authors:  H W Hopper; S E Williams; D J Byerley; M M Rollosson; P O Ahmed; T E Kiser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Economic merit of crossbred and purebred US dairy cattle.

Authors:  P M VanRaden; A H Sanders
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 8.  Optimising reproductive performance of beef cows and replacement heifers.

Authors:  M G Diskin; D A Kenny
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Genetics and genomics of reproductive performance in dairy and beef cattle.

Authors:  D P Berry; E Wall; J E Pryce
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consumer Acceptability of Intramuscular Fat.

Authors:  Damian Frank; Seon-Tea Joo; Robyn Warner
Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 2.622

View more
  6 in total

1.  The achievement of a given carcass specification is under moderate genetic control in cattle.

Authors:  David Kenny; Michelle M Judge; Roy D Sleator; Craig P Murphy; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Carcass and efficiency metrics of beef cattle differ by whether the calf was born in a dairy or a beef herd.

Authors:  Alan J Twomey; Siobhán C Ring; Noirin McHugh; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The Association Between Genomic Heterozygosity and Carcass Merit in Cattle.

Authors:  David Kenny; Tara R Carthy; Craig P Murphy; Roy D Sleator; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Effects of Maternal Nutrient Restriction and Melatonin Supplementation on Cardiomyocyte Cell Development Parameters Using Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Mitra Mazinani; Zully E Contreras-Correa; Vahid Behzadan; Shreya Gopal; Caleb O Lemley
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-16       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Detection of Genomic Imprinting for Carcass Traits in Cattle Using Imputed High-Density Genotype Data.

Authors:  David Kenny; Roy D Sleator; Craig P Murphy; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Does Finishing at Pasture Influence the Colour of Muscle from Suckler Bulls and Can Colour Be Used to Authenticate Their Pre-Slaughter Diet?

Authors:  Aidan P Moloney; Edward G O'Riordan; Mark McGee; Brigitte Picard; Frank J Monahan; Lara Moran; Raquel Cama-Moncunill
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-07-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.