Literature DB >> 31100112

Linear classification scores in beef cattle as predictors of genetic merit for individual carcass primal cut yields1.

Donagh P Berry1, Thierry Pabiou2, Rory Fanning3, Ross D Evans2, Michelle M Judge1.   

Abstract

Having access to early predictions of both the genetic merit and expected phenotypic performance of an individual or its progeny can contribute to more informed decision-making. The objective here was to evaluate the usefulness of routinely available subjectively scored linear conformation information on live animals to predict genetic merit for primal carcass cut yields of their relatives. Data on 6 muscular and 6 skeletal traits on 43,078 live animals were used; the weights of up to 14 primal cuts plus 3 groups of primal cuts of 31,827 cattle were also used. Genetic correlations between the linear scores and the primal cut weights were estimated using sire linear mixed models; correlations were estimated with or without phenotypic adjustment of the primal cut weights to a constant carcass weight. The genetic correlations between each of the muscular and skeletal linear type traits with each of the primal cut weights (not adjusted for carcass weight) were all positive with the exception of the correlations between both chest width and pelvic length with cuberoll. On average, the muscular type traits were more strongly correlated (on average 0.42) with the primal cut weights than the skeletal traits (on average 0.35). Moreover, the average of the genetic correlations between each of the 6 muscular traits with all 8 hindquarter traits was, on average, 10% to 18% stronger than the average of the genetic correlations between the same muscular traits with all 5 forequarter primal cuts. When adjusted for differences in carcass weight, the correlations between all linear scores and the carcass traits regressed to zero or became negative. The skeletal traits were, in general, weakly genetically correlated with the primal cuts adjusted to a common carcass weight. The average of the genetic correlation between the muscular type traits and the primal cuts adjusted for differences in carcass weight was only 0.09 with only 13 of the 84 pairwise correlations being stronger than 0.30; the genetic correlation between silverside with the muscular traits was all stronger than 0.30, whereas the majority of the muscular traits had a correlation stronger than 0.30 with the topside primal cut. In fact, the average of the genetic correlations between the topside and silverside cuts with all the muscular traits was 0.50 and 0.42, respectively, with none of the correlations being negative.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cattle; muscle; skeletal; type trait; weight

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31100112      PMCID: PMC6541829          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  18 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic and phenotypic variance and covariance components for feed intake, feed efficiency, and other postweaning traits in Angus cattle.

Authors:  P F Arthur; J A Archer; D J Johnston; R M Herd; E C Richardson; P F Parnell
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Genetic correlation estimates between ultrasound measurements on yearling bulls and carcass measurements on finished steers.

Authors:  C J Devitt; J W Wilton
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Evaluation of classifiers that score linear type traits and body condition score using common sires.

Authors:  R F Veerkamp; C L M Gerritsen; E P C Koenen; A Hamoen; G De Jong
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Live animal measurements, carcass composition and plasma hormone and metabolite concentrations in male progeny of sires differing in genetic merit for beef production.

Authors:  A M Clarke; M J Drennan; M McGee; D A Kenny; R D Evans; D P Berry
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Predicting beef carcass meat, fat and bone proportions from carcass conformation and fat scores or hindquarter dissection.

Authors:  S B Conroy; M J Drennan; M McGee; M G Keane; D A Kenny; D P Berry
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  A review of the development and use of video image analysis (VIA) for beef carcass evaluation as an alternative to the current EUROP system and other subjective systems.

Authors:  C R Craigie; E A Navajas; R W Purchas; C A Maltin; L Bünger; S O Hoskin; D W Ross; S T Morris; R Roehe
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Genetic associations between feed efficiency measured in a performance test station and performance of growing cattle in commercial beef herds.

Authors:  J J Crowley; R D Evans; N Mc Hugh; T Pabiou; D A Kenny; M McGee; D H Crews; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Genetic associations between daily BW gain and live fleshiness of station-tested young bulls and carcass and meat quality traits of commercial intact males in Piemontese cattle.

Authors:  V Bonfatti; A Albera; P Carnier
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Genetic parameters for cattle price and body weight from routinely collected data at livestock auctions and commercial farms.

Authors:  N Mc Hugh; R D Evans; P R Amer; A G Fahey; D P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  3 in total

1.  Genome-wide Association Study for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-step Bayesian Approach in Hanwoo Cattle.

Authors:  Masoumeh Naserkheil; Hossein Mehrban; Deukmin Lee; Mi Na Park
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

2.  Identification of genomic regions that exhibit sexual dimorphism for size and muscularity in cattle.

Authors:  Jennifer L Doyle; Deirdre C Purfield; Tom Moore; Tara R Carthy; Siobhan W Walsh; Roel F Veerkamp; Ross D Evans; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Evaluation of Genome-Enabled Prediction for Carcass Primal Cut Yields Using Single-Step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction in Hanwoo Cattle.

Authors:  Masoumeh Naserkheil; Hossein Mehrban; Deukmin Lee; Mi Na Park
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.096

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.