Literature DB >> 36264980

The use of video laryngoscopy outside the operating room: A systematic review.

Emma J Perkins1, Jonathan L Begley1,2, Fiona M Brewster3, Nathan D Hanegbi1, Arun A Ilancheran1, David J Brewster2,4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to describe how video laryngoscopy is used outside the operating room within the hospital setting. Specifically, we aimed to summarise the evidence for the use of video laryngoscopy outside the operating room, and detail how it appears in current clinical practice guidelines. A literature search was conducted across two databases (MEDLINE and Embase), and all articles underwent screening for relevance to our aims and pre-determined exclusion criteria. Our results include 14 clinical practice guidelines, 12 interventional studies, 38 observational studies. Our results show that video laryngoscopy is likely to improve glottic view and decrease the incidence of oesophageal intubations; however, it remains unclear as to how this contributes to first-pass success, overall intubation success and clinical outcomes such as mortality outside the operating room. Furthermore, our results indicate that the appearance of video laryngoscopy in clinical practice guidelines has increased in recent years, and particularly through the COVID-19 pandemic. Current COVID-19 airway management guidelines unanimously introduce video laryngoscopy as a first-line (rather than rescue) device.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264980      PMCID: PMC9584394          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  65 in total

1.  Randomized Trial of Video Laryngoscopy for Endotracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  David R Janz; Matthew W Semler; Robert J Lentz; Daniel T Matthews; Tufik R Assad; Brett C Norman; Raj D Keriwala; Benjamin A Ferrell; Michael J Noto; Ciara M Shaver; Bradley W Richmond; Jeannette Zinggeler Berg; Todd W Rice
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients.

Authors:  Maria Michailidou; Terence O'Keeffe; Jarrod M Mosier; Randall S Friese; Bellal Joseph; Peter Rhee; John C Sakles
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Does the Use of Video Laryngoscopy Improve Intubation Outcomes?

Authors:  Michael D April; Brit Long
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 5.721

4.  The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill.

Authors:  Pierre Kory; Keith Guevarra; Joseph P Mathew; Abhijith Hegde; Paul H Mayo
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Arulkumaran; J Lowe; R Ions; M Mendoza; V Bennett; M W Dunser
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Improved glottic exposure with the Video Macintosh Laryngoscope in adult emergency department tracheal intubations.

Authors:  Calvin A Brown; Aaron E Bair; Daniel J Pallin; Erik G Laurin; Ron M Walls
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Silverberg; Nan Li; Samuel O Acquah; Pierre D Kory
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 7.598

8.  Comparison of the time to successful endotracheal intubation using the Macintosh laryngoscope or KingVision video laryngoscope in the emergency department: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Tanvi Mallick; Ankur Verma; Sanjay Jaiswal; Meghna Haldar; Wasil Rasool Sheikh; Amit Vishen; Abhishek Snehy; Rinkey Ahuja
Journal:  Turk J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-28

9.  Expert consensus statements for the management of COVID-19-related acute respiratory failure using a Delphi method.

Authors:  Prashant Nasa; Elie Azoulay; Ashish K Khanna; Ravi Jain; Sachin Gupta; Yash Javeri; Deven Juneja; Pradeep Rangappa; Krishnaswamy Sundararajan; Waleed Alhazzani; Massimo Antonelli; Yaseen M Arabi; Jan Bakker; Laurent J Brochard; Adam M Deane; Bin Du; Sharon Einav; Andrés Esteban; Ognjen Gajic; Samuel M Galvagno; Claude Guérin; Samir Jaber; Gopi C Khilnani; Younsuck Koh; Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou; Flavia R Machado; Manu L N G Malbrain; Jordi Mancebo; Michael T McCurdy; Brendan A McGrath; Sangeeta Mehta; Armand Mekontso-Dessap; Mervyn Mer; Michael Nurok; Pauline K Park; Paolo Pelosi; John V Peter; Jason Phua; David V Pilcher; Lise Piquilloud; Peter Schellongowski; Marcus J Schultz; Manu Shankar-Hari; Suveer Singh; Massimiliano Sorbello; Ravindranath Tiruvoipati; Andrew A Udy; Tobias Welte; Sheila N Myatra
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.