M A Konerman1, S Yapali, A S Lok. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Advances in hepatitis C therapies have led to increasing numbers of patients seeking treatment. As a result, logistical and financial concerns regarding how treatment can be provided to all patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) have emerged. AIM: To evaluate predictors and predictive models of histological progression and clinical outcomes for patients with CHC. METHODS: MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2003 and June 2014. Two authors independently reviewed articles to select eligible studies and performed data abstraction. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies representing 5817 patients from 20 unique cohorts were included. The outcome incidence rates were widely variable: 16-61% during median follow-up of 2.5-10 years for fibrosis progression; 13-40% over 2.3-14.4 years for hepatic decompensation and 8-47% over 3.9-14.4 years for overall mortality. Multivariate analyses showed that baseline steatosis and baseline fibrosis score were the most consistent predictors of fibrosis progression (significant in 6/21 and 5/21, studies, respectively) while baseline platelet count (significant in 6/13 studies), aspartate and alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) ratio, albumin, bilirubin and age (each significant in 4/13 studies) were the most consistent predictors of clinical outcomes. Five studies developed predictive models but none were externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: Our review identified the variables that most consistently predict outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C allowing the application of risk based approaches to identify patients in need of early treatment and intensive monitoring. This approach maximises effective use of resources and costly new direct-acting anti-viral agents.
BACKGROUND: Advances in hepatitis C therapies have led to increasing numbers of patients seeking treatment. As a result, logistical and financial concerns regarding how treatment can be provided to all patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) have emerged. AIM: To evaluate predictors and predictive models of histological progression and clinical outcomes for patients with CHC. METHODS: MEDLINE via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Scopus were searched for studies published between January 2003 and June 2014. Two authors independently reviewed articles to select eligible studies and performed data abstraction. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies representing 5817 patients from 20 unique cohorts were included. The outcome incidence rates were widely variable: 16-61% during median follow-up of 2.5-10 years for fibrosis progression; 13-40% over 2.3-14.4 years for hepatic decompensation and 8-47% over 3.9-14.4 years for overall mortality. Multivariate analyses showed that baseline steatosis and baseline fibrosis score were the most consistent predictors of fibrosis progression (significant in 6/21 and 5/21, studies, respectively) while baseline platelet count (significant in 6/13 studies), aspartate and alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) ratio, albumin, bilirubin and age (each significant in 4/13 studies) were the most consistent predictors of clinical outcomes. Five studies developed predictive models but none were externally validated. CONCLUSIONS: Our review identified the variables that most consistently predict outcomes of patients with chronic hepatitis C allowing the application of risk based approaches to identify patients in need of early treatment and intensive monitoring. This approach maximises effective use of resources and costly new direct-acting anti-viral agents.
Authors: Sandra Tuma Khouri; Renata M Perez; Patrícia Marinho de Oliveira; Virginia Maria Figueiredo; Denize Vieira Barbosa; Valeria Pereira Lanzoni; Antonio Eduardo B Silva; Maria Lucia Ferraz Journal: J Clin Gastroenterol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.062
Authors: Robert A Levine; Schuyler O Sanderson; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Frank Murray; Elaine Kay; John Hegarty; Niamh Nolan; Dermot Kelleher; George McDonald; J Conor O'Keane; John Crowe Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-08-08 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Marc G Ghany; David E Kleiner; Harvey Alter; Edward Doo; Farooq Khokar; Kittichai Promrat; David Herion; Yoon Park; T Jake Liang; Jay H Hoofnagle Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Ponni Perumalswami; David E Kleiner; Glen Lutchman; Theo Heller; Brian Borg; Yoon Park; T Jake Liang; Jay H Hoofnagle; Marc G Ghany Journal: Hepatology Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Marija Zeremski; Rositsa B Dimova; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Ype P de Jong; Ira M Jacobson; Andrew H Talal Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Monica A Konerman; Yiwei Zhang; Ji Zhu; Peter D R Higgins; Anna S F Lok; Akbar K Waljee Journal: Hepatology Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Thomas Karlas; Joachim Berger; Nikita Garnov; Franziska Lindner; Harald Busse; Nicolas Linder; Alexander Schaudinn; Bettina Relke; Rima Chakaroun; Michael Tröltzsch; Johannes Wiegand; Volker Keim Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Said A Al-Busafi; Halima Al-Shuaili; Heba Omar; Haifa Al-Zuhaibi; L Jeyaseelan; Khalid Al-Naamani Journal: Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J Date: 2018-01-10
Authors: Monica A Konerman; Dongxia Lu; Yiwei Zhang; Mary Thomson; Ji Zhu; Aashesh Verma; Boang Liu; Nizar Talaat; Ulysses Balis; Peter D R Higgins; Anna S F Lok; Akbar K Waljee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 3.240