Thomas Ward1, Jason Gordon2,3, Beverley Jones2, Hayley Bennett2, Samantha Webster2, Anupama Kalsekar4, Yong Yuan4, Michael Brenner5, Phil McEwan2,6. 1. HEOR, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, 9 Oak Tree Court, Mulberry Drive, Cardiff Gate Business Park, CF23 8RS, Cardiff, UK. tom.ward@heor.co.uk. 2. HEOR, Health Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, 9 Oak Tree Court, Mulberry Drive, Cardiff Gate Business Park, CF23 8RS, Cardiff, UK. 3. Department of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. 4. World Wide Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Princeton, USA. 5. UK HEOR, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, UK. 6. School of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Targeted intervention in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) closest to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) progression may offer an approach to treatment prioritisation whilst delivering benefits for patients and the healthcare system. In contrast to previous HCV economic analyses, this study aimed to estimate the health economic value of sustained virologic response (SVR) stratified by the patient's propensity to progress to ESLD. METHODS: An HCV natural history model was adapted to estimate the value of avoiding ESLD complications following SVR, assessed as cost offsets and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains, as a function of time to ESLD at treatment initiation. These outcomes were used to estimate the financial value of achieving SVR, defined as the maximum investment that could be allocated without exceeding a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY. RESULTS: Regardless of time to ESLD onset, achieving SVR was beneficial, resulting in cost offsets and QALY gains, due to avoidance of ESLD complications. The value of achieving SVR was greatest in patients closest to ESLD onset, resulting in increased cost offsets and QALY gains (up to £50,901 and 9.56 QALYs). In patients closest to ESLD onset, the financial value of achieving SVR was £242,051, compared with £127,116 in patients furthest from onset. CONCLUSIONS: Standard cost-effectiveness evaluations may underestimate the value of treatment in HCV patients closest to ESLD development. Targeted intervention would promote efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources and reconcile concerns surrounding the affordability of new direct-acting antivirals, by minimising the number-needed-to-treat to maximise health benefit, whilst minimising healthcare expenditure.
BACKGROUND: Targeted intervention in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) closest to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) progression may offer an approach to treatment prioritisation whilst delivering benefits for patients and the healthcare system. In contrast to previous HCV economic analyses, this study aimed to estimate the health economic value of sustained virologic response (SVR) stratified by the patient's propensity to progress to ESLD. METHODS: An HCV natural history model was adapted to estimate the value of avoiding ESLD complications following SVR, assessed as cost offsets and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gains, as a function of time to ESLD at treatment initiation. These outcomes were used to estimate the financial value of achieving SVR, defined as the maximum investment that could be allocated without exceeding a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY. RESULTS: Regardless of time to ESLD onset, achieving SVR was beneficial, resulting in cost offsets and QALY gains, due to avoidance of ESLD complications. The value of achieving SVR was greatest in patients closest to ESLD onset, resulting in increased cost offsets and QALY gains (up to £50,901 and 9.56 QALYs). In patients closest to ESLD onset, the financial value of achieving SVR was £242,051, compared with £127,116 in patients furthest from onset. CONCLUSIONS: Standard cost-effectiveness evaluations may underestimate the value of treatment in HCVpatients closest to ESLD development. Targeted intervention would promote efficient allocation of limited healthcare resources and reconcile concerns surrounding the affordability of new direct-acting antivirals, by minimising the number-needed-to-treat to maximise health benefit, whilst minimising healthcare expenditure.
Authors: A J van der Meer; B J Veldt; J J Feld; H Wedemeyer; J-F Dufour; F Lammert; A Duarte-Rojo; M P Manns; S Zeuzem; W P Hofmann; R J de Knegt; B E Hansen; H L A Janssen Journal: J Viral Hepat Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.728
Authors: Stuart C Gordon; Paul J Pockros; Norah A Terrault; Robert S Hoop; Ami Buikema; David Nerenz; Fayez M Hamzeh Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Giuseppe Cabibbo; Marcello Maida; Chiara Genco; Pietro Parisi; Marco Peralta; Michela Antonucci; Giuseppe Brancatelli; Calogero Cammà; Antonio Craxì; Vito Di Marco Journal: World J Hepatol Date: 2012-09-27
Authors: Jordan J Feld; Ira M Jacobson; Christophe Hézode; Tarik Asselah; Peter J Ruane; Norbert Gruener; Armand Abergel; Alessandra Mangia; Ching-Lung Lai; Henry L Y Chan; Francesco Mazzotta; Christophe Moreno; Eric Yoshida; Stephen D Shafran; William J Towner; Tram T Tran; John McNally; Anu Osinusi; Evguenia Svarovskaia; Yanni Zhu; Diana M Brainard; John G McHutchison; Kosh Agarwal; Stefan Zeuzem Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Mark S Sulkowski; David F Gardiner; Maribel Rodriguez-Torres; K Rajender Reddy; Tarek Hassanein; Ira Jacobson; Eric Lawitz; Anna S Lok; Federico Hinestrosa; Paul J Thuluvath; Howard Schwartz; David R Nelson; Gregory T Everson; Timothy Eley; Megan Wind-Rotolo; Shu-Pang Huang; Min Gao; Dennis Hernandez; Fiona McPhee; Diane Sherman; Robert Hindes; William Symonds; Claudio Pasquinelli; Dennis M Grasela Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Margaret Hellard; Sophia E Schroeder; Alisa Pedrana; Joseph Doyle; Campbell Aitken Journal: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 6.915