Literature DB >> 25162886

Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal.

Magnus Løberg1, Mette Kalager, Øyvind Holme, Geir Hoff, Hans-Olov Adami, Michael Bretthauer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although colonoscopic surveillance of patients after removal of adenomas is widely promoted, little is known about colorectal-cancer mortality among these patients.
METHODS: Using the linkage of the Cancer Registry and the Cause of Death Registry of Norway, we estimated colorectal-cancer mortality among patients who had undergone removal of colorectal adenomas during the period from 1993 through 2007. Patients were followed through 2011. We calculated standardized incidence-based mortality ratios (SMRs) using rates for the Norwegian population at large for comparison. Norwegian guidelines recommended colonoscopy after 10 years for patients with high-risk adenomas (adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, a villous component, or a size ≥10 mm) and after 5 years for patients with three or more adenomas; no surveillance was recommended for patients with low-risk adenomas. Polyp size and exact number were not available in the registry. We defined high-risk adenomas as multiple adenomas and adenomas with a villous component or high-grade dysplasia.
RESULTS: We identified 40,826 patients who had had colorectal adenomas removed. During a median follow-up of 7.7 years (maximum, 19.0), 1273 patients were given a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A total of 398 deaths from colorectal cancer were expected and 383 were observed, for an SMR of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.06) among patients who had had adenomas removed. Colorectal-cancer mortality was increased among patients with high-risk adenomas (expected deaths, 209; observed deaths, 242; SMR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.31), but it was reduced among patients with low-risk adenomas (expected deaths, 189; observed deaths, 141; SMR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: After a median of 7.7 years of follow-up, colorectal-cancer mortality was lower among patients who had had low-risk adenomas removed and moderately higher among those who had had high-risk adenomas removed, as compared with the general population. (Funded by the Norwegian Cancer Society and others.).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25162886     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1315870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  89 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Personalized Surveillance After Colorectal Adenomatous Polypectomy.

Authors:  Ethna McFerran; James F O'Mahony; Richard Fallis; Duncan McVicar; Ann G Zauber; Frank Kee
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Authors' response to Eluri et al. letter to the editor regarding: Colorectal cancer prevention by an optimized colonoscopy protocol in routine practice.

Authors:  Sudha Xirasagar; Piet C de Groen
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Does Colon Polyp Surveillance Improve Patient Outcomes?

Authors:  David Lieberman; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 4.  Risk of Advanced Adenoma, Colorectal Cancer, and Colorectal Cancer Mortality in People With Low-Risk Adenomas at Baseline Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Catherine Dubé; Mafo Yakubu; Bronwen R McCurdy; Andrea Lischka; Anna Koné; Meghan J Walker; Leslea Peirson; Jill Tinmouth
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer: genetic abnormalities, tumor progression, tumor heterogeneity, clonal evolution and tumor-initiating cells.

Authors:  Ugo Testa; Elvira Pelosi; Germana Castelli
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-13

6.  Risk stratification of individuals with low-risk colorectal adenomas using clinical characteristics: a pooled analysis.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Elizabeth T Jacobs; John A Baron; David A Lieberman; Gwen Murphy; Uri Ladabaum; Amanda J Cross; Rodrigo Jover; Lin Liu; Maria Elena Martinez
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal adenomas: Only for expert centers?

Authors:  Mario Anders; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.623

Review 8.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

9.  Post-polypectomy recurrence: Low detector or high-risk polyp?

Authors:  C Hassan; A Repici; D K Rex
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.623

10.  High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Amy B Knudsen; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.