Literature DB >> 26658145

Risk stratification of individuals with low-risk colorectal adenomas using clinical characteristics: a pooled analysis.

Samir Gupta1,2,3, Elizabeth T Jacobs4, John A Baron5, David A Lieberman6, Gwen Murphy7, Uri Ladabaum8, Amanda J Cross9, Rodrigo Jover10, Lin Liu3,11, Maria Elena Martinez3,11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: For individuals with 1-2 small (<1 cm) low-risk colorectal adenomas, international guidelines range from no surveillance to offering surveillance colonoscopy in 5-10 years. We hypothesised that the risks for metachronous advanced neoplasia (AN) among patients with low-risk adenomas differ based on clinical factors distinct from those currently used.
DESIGN: We pooled data from seven prospective studies to assess the risk of metachronous AN. Two groups with 1-2 small adenomas were defined based on guidelines from the UK (n=4516) or the European Union (EU)/US (n=2477).
RESULTS: Absolute risk of metachronous AN ranged from a low of 2.9% to a high of 12.2%, depending on specific risk factor and guideline used. For the UK group, the highest absolute risks for metachronous AN were found among individuals with a history of prior polyp (12.2%), villous histology (12.2%), age ≥70 years (10.9%), high-grade dysplasia (10.9%), any proximal adenoma (10.2%), distal and proximal adenoma (10.8%) or two adenomas (10.1%). For the EU/US group, the highest absolute risks for metachronous AN were among individuals with a history of prior polyp (11.5%) or the presence of both proximal and distal adenomas (11.0%). In multivariate analyses, strong associations for increasing age and history of prior polyps and odds of metachronous AN were observed, whereas more modest associations were shown for baseline proximal adenomas and those with villous features.
CONCLUSIONS: Risks of metachronous AN among individuals with 1-2 small adenomas vary according to readily available clinical characteristics. These characteristics may be considered for recommending colonoscopy surveillance and require further investigation. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; EPIDEMIOLOGY; POLYP; SURVEILLANCE

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26658145      PMCID: PMC8248523          DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  23 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Douglas K Rex; Sidney J Winawer; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Theodore R Levin
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Lack of effect of a high-fiber cereal supplement on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Phoenix Colon Cancer Prevention Physicians' Network.

Authors:  D S Alberts; M E Martínez; D J Roe; J M Guillén-Rodríguez; J R Marshall; J B van Leeuwen; M E Reid; C Ritenbaugh; P A Vargas; A B Bhattacharyya; D L Earnest; R E Sampliner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Lack of effect of a low-fat, high-fiber diet on the recurrence of colorectal adenomas. Polyp Prevention Trial Study Group.

Authors:  A Schatzkin; E Lanza; D Corle; P Lance; F Iber; B Caan; M Shike; J Weissfeld; R Burt; M R Cooper; J W Kikendall; J Cahill
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Phase III trial of ursodeoxycholic acid to prevent colorectal adenoma recurrence.

Authors:  David S Alberts; María Elena Martínez; Lisa M Hess; Janine G Einspahr; Sylvan B Green; A K Bhattacharyya; Jose Guillen; Mary Krutzsch; Ashok K Batta; Gerald Salen; Liane Fales; Kris Koonce; Dianne Parish; Mary Clouser; Denise Roe; Peter Lance
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Øyvind Holme; Magnus Løberg; Mette Kalager; Michael Bretthauer; Miguel A Hernán; Eline Aas; Tor J Eide; Eva Skovlund; Jørn Schneede; Kjell Magne Tveit; Geir Hoff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Aasma Shaukat; Steven J Mongin; Mindy S Geisser; Frank A Lederle; John H Bond; Jack S Mandel; Timothy R Church
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Long-term colorectal-cancer mortality after adenoma removal.

Authors:  Magnus Løberg; Mette Kalager; Øyvind Holme; Geir Hoff; Hans-Olov Adami; Michael Bretthauer
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M J O'Brien; M N Ho; L Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; J Bond; M Schapiro; E T Stewart
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A clinical trial of antioxidant vitamins to prevent colorectal adenoma. Polyp Prevention Study Group.

Authors:  E R Greenberg; J A Baron; T D Tosteson; D H Freeman; G J Beck; J H Bond; T A Colacchio; J A Coller; H D Frankl; R W Haile
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-07-21       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  7 in total

1.  Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; John A Baron; Dennis J Ahnen; Elizabeth L Barry; Roberd M Bostick; Carol A Burke; Robert S Bresalier; Timothy R Church; Bernard F Cole; Marcia Cruz-Correa; Adam S Kim; Leila A Mott; Robert S Sandler; Douglas J Robertson
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  The predictive value of routine laboratory tests for colorectal polyps: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Xinyi Feng; Xiuping Jiao; Yemin Xu; Xi Xu; Yan Zhu; Qiang She; Yaoyao Li; Guiqing Li; Jian Wu; Weiming Xiao; Yanbing Ding; Bin Deng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-02

3.  High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Authors:  Reinier G S Meester; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Sidney J Winawer; Ann G Zauber; Amy B Knudsen; Uri Ladabaum
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Recommendations for Follow-Up After Colonoscopy and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; David Lieberman; Joseph C Anderson; Carol A Burke; Jason A Dominitz; Tonya Kaltenbach; Douglas J Robertson; Aasma Shaukat; Sapna Syngal; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 12.045

Review 7.  Post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: Comparison of the updated guidelines.

Authors:  Naim Abu-Freha; Lior H Katz; Revital Kariv; Elez Vainer; Ido Laish; Nathan Gluck; Elizabeth E Half; Zohar Levi
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.