Literature DB >> 25162650

Conversion table for running on lower body positive pressure treadmills.

John R Kline1, Scot Raab, J Richard Coast, Roger G Bounds, David K P McNeill, Hendrik D de Heer.   

Abstract

Lower body positive pressure (LBPP) or antigravity treadmills are becoming increasingly popular in sports and rehabilitation settings. Running at a decreased body weight (BW) reduces metabolic cost, which can be offset by running at faster speeds. To date, however, little is known about how much faster someone must run to offset the reduced metabolic cost. This study aimed to develop a user-friendly conversion table showing the speeds required on an LBPP treadmill to match the equivalent metabolic output on a regular, non-LBPP, treadmill across a range of body weight supports. A total of 20 recreational runners (11 males, 9 females) ran multiple 3-minute intervals on a regular treadmill and then on an LBPP treadmill at 6 different BWs (50-100%, 10% increments). Metabolic outputs were recorded and matched between the regular and LBPP treadmill sessions. Using regression analyses, a conversion table was successfully created for the speeds from 6.4 to 16.1 km·h (4 to 10 mph) in 0.8 km·h (0.5 mph) increments on the regular treadmill and BW proportions of 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, and 100% on an LBPP treadmill. The table showed that a greater increase in speed on the LBPP treadmill was needed with more support (p < 0.001) but that the proportion increase was smaller at higher speeds (p < 0.001). This research has implications for coaches or practitioners using or prescribing training on an LBPP treadmill.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25162650     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000658

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  7 in total

Review 1.  Physiological and Biomechanical Responses to Running on Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills in Healthy Populations.

Authors:  Kathryn A Farina; Alexis A Wright; Kevin R Ford; Leah Anne Wirfel; James M Smoliga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Potential utility of anti-gravity treadmills in the realm of cardiovascular stress testing.

Authors:  Vasvi Singh; Saurabh Malhotra
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Oxygen consumption of elite distance runners on an anti-gravity treadmill®.

Authors:  David K P McNeill; John R Kline; Hendrick D de Heer; J Richard Coast
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  THE EFFECT OF AN ANTI-GRAVITY TREADMILL ON RUNNING CADENCE.

Authors:  Josie Stockland; M Russell Giveans; Peter Ames
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12

5.  AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill Accuracy of Unloading Is Affected by Support Frame Height.

Authors:  Hendrik D de Heer; Alex Kaufman; Chris P Repka; Katia Rojas; Brenda Charley; Roger Bounds
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.415

6.  Role of Antigravity Training in Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Running Injuries.

Authors:  Heather K Vincent; Aimee Madsen; Kevin R Vincent
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28

7.  Physiological and Biomechanical Responses of Highly Trained Distance Runners to Lower-Body Positive Pressure Treadmill Running.

Authors:  Kyle R Barnes; Jessica N Janecke
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-11-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.