Literature DB >> 31403571

AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill Accuracy of Unloading Is Affected by Support Frame Height.

Hendrik D de Heer1, Alex Kaufman2, Chris P Repka1, Katia Rojas2, Brenda Charley1, Roger Bounds1.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: de Heer, HD, Kaufman, A, Repka, CP, Rojas, K, Charley, B, and Bounds, R. AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill accuracy of unloading is affected by support frame height. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2910-2914, 2021-The AlterG Anti-Gravity Treadmill uses air pressure to provide partial body-weight support (BWS), lowering impact forces and metabolic demand of walking and running. Users wear specialized shorts that zip onto a bag supported by a metal bar frame covering the treadmill. The frame is placed at hip height in positions numbered 1-9, adjusted up or down based on preference. Machine accuracy in providing BWS is important to achieve desired training effects, but it is unknown whether frame placement impacts accuracy. Twenty subjects (10 men/women) were weighed in 10% increments from 0 to 60% BWS with the frame at hip height (iliac crest), the "neutral" position, and reweighed with the frame placed up to 3 numbers above or below hip height. Although the machine displayed the same proportion BWS, placing the frame higher than the neutral position resulted in significantly more support, whereas placing the frame lower led to less support. At 10% BWS, placing the frame 3 positions higher resulted in 3% more support compared with the neutral position (13.1% BWS, p < 0.001) and 3 positions lower in 4.7% less support (5.3% BWS, p < 0.001). Deviances were greater with more BWS. At 60% BWS, 3 positions higher than neutral resulted in 71.2% BWS (11.2% more than expected, p < 0.001) and 3 below 48.1% BWS (12.9% below expected, p < 0.001), total 24.1% difference. These findings suggest that the position of the support frame significantly impacts the AlterG accuracy in providing BWS, with placement higher than hip height resulting in more support than displayed by the machine and lower placement resulting in less support.
Copyright © 2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 31403571      PMCID: PMC7007317          DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   4.415


  13 in total

1.  Metabolic and biomechanical effects of velocity and weight support using a lower-body positive pressure device during walking.

Authors:  Alena M Grabowski
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Physiological responses to body weight--supported treadmill exercise in healthy adults.

Authors:  Martin D Hoffman; Haylee E Donaghe
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  Evaluation of lower body positive pressure supported treadmill training for children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Max J Kurz; Brad Corr; Wayne Stuberg; Kathleen G Volkman; Nina Smith
Journal:  Pediatr Phys Ther       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.049

Review 4.  Physiological and Biomechanical Responses to Running on Lower Body Positive Pressure Treadmills in Healthy Populations.

Authors:  Kathryn A Farina; Alexis A Wright; Kevin R Ford; Leah Anne Wirfel; James M Smoliga
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Return to running following knee osteochondral repair using an anti-gravity treadmill: A case report.

Authors:  Karen Hambly; Somruthai Poomsalood; Emma Mundy
Journal:  Phys Ther Sport       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.365

Review 6.  Anti-gravity treadmills are effective in reducing knee forces.

Authors:  Shantanu Patil; Nikolai Steklov; William D Bugbee; Timothy Goldberg; Clifford W Colwell; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Use of partial body-weight support for aggressive return to running after lumbar disk herniation: a case report.

Authors:  Melita N Moore; Carol Vandenakker-Albanese; Martin D Hoffman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Use of an anti-gravity treadmill in the rehabilitation of the operated achilles tendon: a pilot study.

Authors:  Amol Saxena; Allison Granot
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.286

9.  Accuracy of unloading with the anti-gravity treadmill.

Authors:  David K P McNeill; Hendrik D de Heer; Roger G Bounds; J Richard Coast
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  What are the main running-related musculoskeletal injuries? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alexandre Dias Lopes; Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Júnior; Simon S Yeung; Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  Role of Antigravity Training in Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Running Injuries.

Authors:  Heather K Vincent; Aimee Madsen; Kevin R Vincent
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.