Literature DB >> 25159646

Robotic left colon cancer resection: a dual docking technique that maximizes splenic flexure mobilization.

Sung Uk Bae1, Se Jin Baek, Hyuk Hur, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, Byung Soh Min.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Techniques for robotic resection of the left colon are not well defined and have not been widely adopted due to limited range of motion of the robotic arms. We have developed a dual docking technique for both the splenic flexure and the pelvis. We report our initial experience of robotic left colectomy using this technique for left-sided colon cancer.
METHODS: The study group comprised 61 patients who underwent robotic left colon cancer resection using our dual docking technique between July 2008 and January 2013. Operations comprised two stages: colon mobilization (stage 1) followed by pelvic dissection (stage 2). After completion of stage 1, the robot arms were undocked and the operating table was rotated 60° counterclockwise until a 45° angle was created between the patient cart and the operating table.
RESULTS: All 61 procedures were technically successful without the need for conversion to laparoscopic or open surgery. Median total operation, 1st docking, and 2nd docking times were 227 min (range, 137-653 min), 4 min (range, 3-8 min), and 3 min (range, 3-9 min), respectively. Estimated blood loss was 20 ml (range, 20-2,000 ml). Median time to soft diet was 2 days (range, 2-12 days) and median length of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 4-20 days). Median total number of lymph nodes harvested was 17 (range, 3-61). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the numbers of complications for grades 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 were 10, 2, 3, 3, and 1. There was no mortality within 30 days.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic left colon cancer resection using our dual docking technique is safe and feasible. This procedure can maximize splenic mobilization in robotic colorectal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25159646     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3805-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; Y Kabeshima; M Watanabe; S Yamamoto; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Faek R Jamali; Asaad M Soweid; Hani Dimassi; Charles Bailey; Joel Leroy; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08

3.  Factors affecting difficulty of laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colon cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Hiroya Kuroyanagi; Masatoshi Oya; Masashi Ueno; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Lymph node recovery from colorectal resection specimens removed for adenocarcinoma. Trends over time and a recommendation for a minimum number of lymph nodes to be recovered.

Authors:  N S Goldstein; W Sanford; M Coffey; L J Layfield
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Short-term Outcomes of a Laparoscopic Left Hemicolectomy for Descending Colon Cancer: Retrospective Comparison with an Open Left Hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Kil-Su Han; Gyu-Seog Choi; Jun-Seok Park; Hye Jin Kim; Soo Yeon Park; Soo-Han Jun
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2010-10-31

6.  Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Minia Hellan; Casandra Anderson; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Benjamin Paz; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome.

Authors:  Fabrizio Luca; Sabine Cenciarelli; Manuela Valvo; Simonetta Pozzi; Felice Lo Faso; Davide Ravizza; Giulia Zampino; Angelica Sonzogni; Roberto Biffi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group.

Authors:  David G Jayne; Pierre J Guillou; Helen Thorpe; Philip Quirke; Joanne Copeland; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  14 in total

1.  Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Dae Ro Lim; Sung Uk Bae; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Standardized access options for colorectal surgery with the da Vinci Xi system].

Authors:  D Perez; A Woestemeier; T Ghadban; H Stein; M Gomez-Ruiz; J R Izbicki; B Soh Min
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Surgical technique for mesorectal division during robot-assisted laparoscopic tumor-specific mesorectal excision (TSME) for rectal cancer using da Vinci Si surgical system: the simple switching technique (SST).

Authors:  Hiroshi Takeyama; Katsuki Danno; Takahiko Nishigaki; Masafumi Yamashita; Yoshio Oka
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-10-20

4.  Multiquadrant robotic colorectal surgery: the da Vinci Xi vs Si comparison.

Authors:  Bogdan Protyniak; Jeffrey Jorden; Russell Farmer
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-03-08

5.  Standardize the Surgical Technique and Clarify the Relevant Anatomic Concept for Complete Mobilization of Colonic Splenic Flexure Using da Vinci Xi® Robotic System.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; John Huang; Tzu-Chun Chen
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  A novel approach for robotic mobilization of the splenic flexure.

Authors:  O Isik; C Benlice; E Gorgun
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  The Senhance Surgical System in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Tyler McKechnie; Jigish Khamar; Ryan Daniel; Yung Lee; Lily Park; Aristithes G Doumouras; Dennis Hong; Mohit Bhandari; Cagla Eskicioglu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-09-21

8.  A prospective, single-arm study on the use of the da Vinci® Table Motion with the Trumpf TS7000dV operating table.

Authors:  Luca Morelli; Matteo Palmeri; Tommaso Simoncini; Vito Cela; Alessandra Perutelli; Cesare Selli; Piero Buccianti; Francesco Francesca; Massimo Cecchi; Cristina Zirafa; Luca Bastiani; Alfred Cuschieri; Franca Melfi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robotic simultaneous resection for colorectal liver metastasis: feasibility for all types of liver resection.

Authors:  Jonathan Navarro; Seoung Yoon Rho; Incheon Kang; Gi Hong Choi; Byung Soh Min
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Single-docking robotic-assisted artery-guided segmental splenic flexure colectomy for splenic flexure cancer-a propensity score-matching analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Zijia Song; Yaqi Zhang; Xiaopin Ji; Xiaoqian Jing; Yi Shi; Xi Cheng; Ren Zhao
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.