Literature DB >> 36127508

The Senhance Surgical System in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Tyler McKechnie1, Jigish Khamar2, Ryan Daniel3, Yung Lee1, Lily Park1, Aristithes G Doumouras1,2,4, Dennis Hong1,2,4, Mohit Bhandari1,2, Cagla Eskicioglu5,6,7.   

Abstract

The Senhance Surgical System allows for infrared eye tracking, haptic feedback, and an adjustable upright seat allowing for improved ergonomics. This systematic review was designed with the aim of reviewing the current literature pertaining to the use of the Senhance Surgical System in colorectal surgery. Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated adults undergoing colorectal surgery with the Senhance Surgical System. The primary outcome was intraoperative efficacy; as defined by operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and conversion. A DerSimonian and Laird inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis was used to generate overall effect size estimates and narrative review was provided for each outcome. Six observational studies with 223 patients (mean age: 63.7, 41.2% female, mean BMI: 24.4 kg/m2) were included. The most common indication for surgery was colorectal cancer (n = 180, 80.7%) and the most common operation was anterior resection (n = 72, 32.3%). Meta-analyses demonstrated a pooled total operative time of 229.8 min (95% CI 189.3-270.4, I2 = 0%), console time of 141.3 min (95% CI 106.5-176.1, I2 = 0%), and docking time of 10.8 min (95% CI 6.4-15.2, I2 = 0%). The pooled EBL was 37.0 mL (95% CI 24.7-49.2, I2 = 20%). Overall, there were nine (4.0%) conversions to laparoscopy/laparotomy. The Senhance Surgical System has an acceptable safety profile, reasonable docking and console times, low conversion rates, and an affordable case cost across a variety of colorectal surgeries. Further prospective, comparative trials with other robotic surgical platforms are warranted.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colectomy; Colorectal surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery; Senhance Surgical System

Year:  2022        PMID: 36127508     DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01455-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Robot Surg        ISSN: 1863-2483


  29 in total

Review 1.  The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery.

Authors:  Garth H Ballantyne
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.719

2.  Emerging role of laparoscopic and robotic surgery for rectal cancers.

Authors:  Glen C Balch
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-04-09       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Oncologic results of laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for stage II or III left-sided colon cancers: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jin-Tung Liang; Kuo-Chin Huang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee; Yung-Ming Jeng
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Emilio Morpurgo; Valentino Fiscon; Paolo Trevisan; Gianna Sovernigo; Camillo Orsini; Daniela Guidolin
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

6.  Laparoscopic-assisted colectomy. The learning curve.

Authors:  J D Wishner; J W Baker; G C Hoffman; G W Hubbard; R J Gould; S D Wohlgemuth; W K Ruffin; C F Melick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of Short-term Surgical Outcomes between a Robotic Colectomy and a Laparoscopic Colectomy during Early Experience.

Authors:  Jin Yong Shin
Journal:  J Korean Soc Coloproctol       Date:  2012-02-29

8.  The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Hubert A Prins; Vicente Arroyo; Ainitze Ibarzabal; Josep M Pique
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.