Literature DB >> 23618561

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: a single center experience of 100 consecutive cases.

O Stănciulea1, M Eftimie, L David, V Tomulescu, C Vasilescu, I Popescu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized the field of general surgery over the few last decades. Despite its advantages, in complex procedures such as rectal surgery, laparoscopy has not achieved a high penetration rate because of its steep learning curve, its relatively high conversion rate and technical challenges. The aim of this study was to present a single center experience with robotic surgery for rectal cancer focusing mainly on early and mid-term postoperative outcome.
METHODS: A series of 100 consecutive patients who underwent robotic rectal surgery between January 2008 and June 2012 was analyzed retrospectively in terms of demographics, pathological data, surgical and oncological outcomes.
RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients underwent robotic sphincter-saving resection, and 23 patients underwent robotic abdominoperineal resection. There were 4 conversions. The median operative time for sphincter-saving procedures was 180 min. The median time for robotic abdominoperineal resection was 160 min. The median distal resection margin of the operative specimen was 3 cm. The median number of retrieved lymph nodes was 14. The median hospital stay was 10 days. In-hospital mortality was nil. The overall morbidity was 30%. Four patients presented transitory postoperative urinary dysfunction. Severe erectile dysfunction was reported by 3 patients. The median length of follow-up was 24 months. The 3-year overall survival rate was 90%.
CONCLUSIONS: Robotic surgery is advantageous for both surgeons (in that it facilitates dissection in a narrow pelvis) and patients (in that it affords a very good quality of life via the preservation of sexual and urinary function in the vast majority of patients and it has low morbidity and good midterm oncological outcomes). In rectal cancer surgery, the robotic approach is a promising alternative and is expected to overcome the low penetration rate of laparoscopy in this field. Celsius.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23618561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurgia (Bucur)        ISSN: 1221-9118


  7 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgical techniques are safe in the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric malignancies.

Authors:  Shannon N Acker; Jennifer L Bruny; Timothy P Garrington; David A Partrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Sexual and urinary outcomes in robotic rectal surgery: review of the literature and technical considerations.

Authors:  Fabrizio Luca; Danielle K Craigg; Maheswari Senthil; Matthew J Selleck; Blake D Babcock; Mark E Reeves; Carlos A Garberoglio
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2018-08-17

3.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review of current practice.

Authors:  Tony Wing Chung Mak; Janet Fung Yee Lee; Kaori Futaba; Sophie Sok Fei Hon; Dennis Kwok Yu Ngo; Simon Siu Man Ng
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-06-15

4.  Robotic colorectal surgery: previous laparoscopic colorectal experience is not essential.

Authors:  Tanvir Singh Sian; G M Tierney; H Park; J N Lund; W J Speake; N G Hurst; H Al Chalabi; K J Smith; S Tou
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 5.  Robotic rectal surgery: State of the art.

Authors:  Fabio Staderini; Caterina Foppa; Alessio Minuzzo; Benedetta Badii; Etleva Qirici; Giacomo Trallori; Beatrice Mallardi; Gabriele Lami; Giuseppe Macrì; Andrea Bonanomi; Siro Bagnoli; Giuliano Perigli; Fabio Cianchi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-11-15

6.  Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Jamil Ahmed; Meghana Ramachandra; Muhammad Farooq; Mick Harper; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Critical analysis of the literature investigating urogenital function preservation following robotic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Jamil Ahmed; Mick Harper; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-11-27
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.