Literature DB >> 25159462

Application of computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured techniques in reconstructing maxillofacial bony structures.

Jan Rustemeyer1, Alexander Busch, Aynur Sari-Rieger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Today, virtually planned surgery and computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured (CAD/CAM) tools to reconstruct bony structures are being increasingly applied to maxillofacial surgery. However, the criteria for or against the usage of the CAD/CAM technique are disputable, since no evidence-based studies are available. Theoretically, the CAD/CAM technique should be applied to complex cases. In this case report, we present our experiences and discuss the criteria for application. CASE REPORT: Three cases are reported in which subjects received an osseous reconstruction using CAD/CAM techniques. In the first case, resection of the mandibular body and ramus was carried out, and reconstruction with a vascularised iliac bone transplant was performed. During surgery, a repositioning of the ipsilateral condyle was necessary. The second case comprised a wide mandibular reconstruction together with a repositioning of the condyles and the soft tissue chin using a two-segment osteomyocutaneous fibula flap. In the third case, a two-flap technique consisting of a double-barrelled osseous fibula flap and a radial forearm flap was applied to cover a wide palatine defect.
CONCLUSION: Our experience suggests that the CAD/CAM technique provides an accurate and useful treatment not only in complex cases, but also in simpler ones, to achieve an anatomically correct shape of the bone transplant and to reposition adjacent structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25159462     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-014-0462-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  10 in total

1.  Midfacial reconstruction using virtual planning, rapid prototype modeling, and stereotactic navigation.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Rhonda F Jacob; Luc Bidaut; Geoffrey L Robb; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Discussion: computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison.

Authors:  Evan Matros; Joseph J Disa
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew M Hanasono; Roman J Skoracki
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Use of virtual 3-dimensional surgery in post-traumatic craniomaxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Oren M Tepper; Sarah Sorice; Gabriel N Hershman; Pierre Saadeh; Jamie P Levine; David Hirsch
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Prosthodontic guidelines for surgical reconstruction of the maxilla: a classification system of defects.

Authors:  D J Okay; E Genden; D Buchbinder; M Urken
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.426

6.  Hemimandibulectomy and vascularized fibula flap in bisphosphonate-induced mandibular osteonecrosis with polycythaemia rubra vera.

Authors:  N Ghazali; J C Collyer; J V Tighe
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  The accuracy of virtual surgical planning in free fibula mandibular reconstruction: comparison of planned and final results.

Authors:  Steven M Roser; Srinivasa Ramachandra; Henry Blair; William Grist; Grant W Carlson; Andrew M Christensen; Katherine A Weimer; Martin B Steed
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 1.895

8.  Virtual surgical planning in complex composite maxillofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Adam Saad; Ryan Winters; M Whitten Wise; Charles L Dupin; Hugo St Hilaire
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Computer-assisted versus conventional free fibula flap technique for craniofacial reconstruction: an outcomes comparison.

Authors:  Mitchel Seruya; Mark Fisher; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Classification of mandibular defects.

Authors:  J B Boyd; P J Gullane; L E Rotstein; D H Brown; J C Irish
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.730

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Osseous Union after Mandible Reconstruction with Fibula Free Flap Using Manually Bent Plates vs. Patient-Specific Implants: A Retrospective Analysis of 89 Patients.

Authors:  Michael Knitschke; Sophia Sonnabend; Fritz Christian Roller; Jörn Pons-Kühnemann; Daniel Schmermund; Sameh Attia; Philipp Streckbein; Hans-Peter Howaldt; Sebastian Böttger
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Advantages of surgical simulation in the surgical reconstruction of oncological patients.

Authors:  F Iglesias-Martín; L-G Oliveros-López; A Fernández-Olavarría; M-A Serrera-Figallo; A Gutiérrez-Corrales; D Torres-Lagares; J-L Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01

3.  Custom-Made Computer-Aided-Design/Computer-Aided-Manufacturing Biphasic Calcium-Phosphate Scaffold for Augmentation of an Atrophic Mandibular Anterior Ridge.

Authors:  Francesco Guido Mangano; Piero Antonio Zecca; Ric van Noort; Samvel Apresyan; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Aldo Macchi; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2015-05-10

4.  Custom-Made Synthetic Scaffolds for Bone Reconstruction: A Retrospective, Multicenter Clinical Study on 15 Patients.

Authors:  Fabrizia Luongo; Francesco Guido Mangano; Aldo Macchi; Giuseppe Luongo; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Effects of Steam Sterilization on 3D Printed Biocompatible Resin Materials for Surgical Guides-An Accuracy Assessment Study.

Authors:  Neha Sharma; Shuaishuai Cao; Bilal Msallem; Christoph Kunz; Philipp Brantner; Philipp Honigmann; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-17       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.