Literature DB >> 23007556

Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling in microvascular mandible reconstruction.

Matthew M Hanasono1, Roman J Skoracki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the use of computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling to improve the speed and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction. STUDY
DESIGN: Case-control study.
METHODS: Between 2005 and 2011, 38 subjects underwent fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction using computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling. Titanium plates were prebent using the models prior to surgery. Direct plate bending on the native mandible to accurately restore occlusion would not have been possible in 11 patients with exophytic tumors, nine patients with pathologic fractures, and 10 patients with a prior segmental mandibulectomy. Computer-generated cutting guides were utilized to facilitate fibular osteotomies.
RESULTS: The mean operative time for subjects was 8.8 ± 1.0 hours compared to the mean operative time defect-matched control group, for whom computer-assisted design and models were not used, of 10.5 ± 1.4 hours (P = .0006). Comparison of the preoperative and postoperative mandibles demonstrated that the mean change in position of selected bony landmarks (condyles, gonions, and gnathion) was less in the subject group than in the control group (4.11 ± 3.09 mm vs. 6.92 ± 5.64 mm, respectively; P = .001) Comparison of postoperative mandibles with preoperative virtual plans showed a mean deviation of 2.40 ± 2.06 mm from planned fibular segment lengths and 3.51 ± 2.69° from planned angles between fibular segments.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted design and rapid prototype modeling have the potential to increase the speed and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction. We believe these technologies are particularly useful for cases in which the original architecture of the mandible has been distorted or destroyed.
Copyright © 2012 The American Laryngological, Rhinological, and Otological Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23007556     DOI: 10.1002/lary.23717

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  35 in total

1.  Application of computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured techniques in reconstructing maxillofacial bony structures.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Alexander Busch; Aynur Sari-Rieger
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-08-27

2.  Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach.

Authors:  Toshiaki Numajiri; Daiki Morita; Hiroko Nakamura; Ryo Yamochi; Shoko Tsujiko; Yoshihiro Sowa
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Contemporary Approach to Locally Advanced Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Christopher M K L Yao; Edward I Chang; Stephen Y Lai
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  A Virtual Surgical Planning Algorithm for Delayed Maxillomandibular Reconstruction.

Authors:  John T Stranix; Carrie S Stern; Michael Rensberger; Ian Ganly; Jay O Boyle; Robert J Allen; Joseph J Disa; Babak J Mehrara; Evan S Garfein; Evan Matros
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Virtual planning of complex head and neck reconstruction results in satisfactory match between real outcomes and virtual models.

Authors:  Henning Hanken; Clemens Schablowsky; Ralf Smeets; Max Heiland; Susanne Sehner; Björn Riecke; Ibrahim Nourwali; Oliver Vorwig; Alexander Gröbe; Ahmed Al-Dam
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  Navigation Guidance During Free Flap Mandibular Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Trial.

Authors:  R Alex Harbison; Xiao-Feng Shan; Zachary Douglas; Scott Bevans; Yangming Li; Kris S Moe; Neal Futran; Jeffrey J Houlton
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

7.  Comparison of intraoperative time measurements between osseous reconstructions with free fibula flaps applying computer-aided designed/computer-aided manufactured and conventional techniques.

Authors:  Jan Rustemeyer; Aynur Sari-Rieger; Alex Melenberg; Alexander Busch
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2015-04-12

8.  Advantages of surgical simulation in the surgical reconstruction of oncological patients.

Authors:  F Iglesias-Martín; L-G Oliveros-López; A Fernández-Olavarría; M-A Serrera-Figallo; A Gutiérrez-Corrales; D Torres-Lagares; J-L Gutiérrez-Pérez
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-09-01

9.  Medical 3D Printing Cost-Savings in Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Surgery: Cost Analysis of Operating Room Time Saved with 3D Printed Anatomic Models and Surgical Guides.

Authors:  David H Ballard; Patrick Mills; Richard Duszak; Jeffery A Weisman; Frank J Rybicki; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Computer-assisted versus traditional freehand technique in fibular free flap mandibular reconstruction: a morphological comparative study.

Authors:  Thibault De Maesschalck; Delphine S Courvoisier; Paolo Scolozzi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.