Literature DB >> 17785647

Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review.

Romsai T Boonyasai1, Donna M Windish, Chayan Chakraborti, Leonard S Feldman, Haya R Rubin, Eric B Bass.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Accreditation requirements mandate teaching quality improvement (QI) concepts to medical trainees, yet little is known about the effectiveness of teaching QI.
OBJECTIVES: To perform a systematic review of the effectiveness of published QI curricula for clinicians and to determine whether teaching methods influence the effectiveness of such curricula. DATA SOURCES: The electronic literature databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and ERIC were searched for English-language articles published between January 1, 1980, and April 30, 2007. Experts in the field of QI were queried about relevant studies. STUDY SELECTION: Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion if the curriculum taught QI principles to clinicians and the evaluation used a comparative study design. DATA EXTRACTION: Information about the features of each curriculum, its use of 9 principles of adult learning, and the type of educational and clinical outcomes were extracted. The relationship between the outcomes and the number of educational principles used was assessed.
RESULTS: Of 39 studies that met eligibility criteria, 31 described team-based projects; 37 combined didactic instruction with experiential learning. The median number of adult learning principles used was 7 (range, 2-8). Evaluations included 22 controlled trials (8 randomized and 14 nonrandomized) and 17 pre/post or time series studies. Fourteen studies described educational outcomes (attitudes, knowledge, or skills or behaviors) and 28 studies described clinical process or patient outcomes. Nine of the 10 studies that evaluated knowledge reported only positive effects but only 2 of these described a validated assessment tool. The 6 assessments of attitudes found mixed results. Four of the 6 studies on skill or behavior outcomes reported only positive effects. Eight of the 28 studies of clinical outcomes reported only beneficial effects. Controlled studies were more likely than other studies to report mixed or null effects. Only 4 studies evaluated both educational and clinical outcomes, providing limited evidence that educational outcomes influence the clinical effectiveness of the interventions.
CONCLUSIONS: Most published QI curricula apply sound adult learning principles and demonstrate improvement in learners' knowledge or confidence to perform QI. Additional studies are needed to determine whether educational methods have meaningful clinical benefits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17785647     DOI: 10.1001/jama.298.9.1023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  70 in total

1.  Development and preliminary evaluation of a practice-based learning and improvement tool for assessing resident competence and guiding curriculum development.

Authors:  Renée H Lawrence; Anne M Tomolo
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

2.  Practice-based learning and improvement curricula: a critical opportunity to educate future physicians and leaders.

Authors:  Prathibha Varkey
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-03

3.  Advancing resident assessment in graduate medical education.

Authors:  Susan R Swing; Stephen G Clyman; Eric S Holmboe; Reed G Williams
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-12

4.  Lessons learned from a 5-year experience with a 4-week experiential quality improvement curriculum in a preventive medicine fellowship.

Authors:  Prathibha Varkey; Sudhakar Prakash Karlapudi
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2009-09

5.  The role for clinician educators in implementing healthcare improvement.

Authors:  David P Stevens; Kathryn B Kirkland
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Teaching internal medicine residents to sustain their improvement through the quality assessment and improvement curriculum.

Authors:  Julie Oyler; Lisa Vinci; Julie K Johnson; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Searching for excellence & diversity: increasing the hiring of women faculty at one academic medical center.

Authors:  Jennifer T Sheridan; Eve Fine; Christine Maidl Pribbenow; Jo Handelsman; Molly Carnes
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Designing for the Future: Quality and Safety Education at US Teaching Hospitals.

Authors:  Kedar S Mate; Marian B Johnson
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-06

9.  A Novel Approach to Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Using a Web-Based Audit and Feedback Module.

Authors:  Joel C Boggan; George Cheely; Bimal R Shah; Randy Heffelfinger; Deanna Springall; Samantha M Thomas; Aimee Zaas; Jonathan Bae
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

10.  Patient safety education among chinese medical undergraduates: An empirical study.

Authors:  Gang Li; Hong-Bing Tao; Jia-Zhi Liao; Jin-Hui Tang; Fang Peng; Qin Shu; Wen-Gang Li; Shun-Gui Tu; Zhuo Chen
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.