Wentao Zhang1, Ning Duan1, Tao Song1, Zhong Li1, Caiguo Zhang2, Xun Chen1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Xi'an Hong-Hui Hospital affiliated to medical college of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710054. 2. Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Abstract
Osteosarcoma is the most common bone cancer primarily occurring in children and young adults. Over the past few years, the deregulation of a superfamily transcription factors, known as forkhead box (FOX) proteins, has been demonstrated to contribute to the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. Molecular mechanism studies have demonstrated that FOX family proteins participate in a variety of signaling pathways and that their expression can be regulated by multiple factors. The dysfunction of FOX genes can alter osteosarcoma cell differentiation, metastasis and progression. In this review, we summarized the evidence that FOX genes play direct or indirect roles in the development and progression of osteosarcoma, and evaluated the emerging role of FOX proteins as targets for therapeutic intervention.
Osteosarcoma is the most common bone cancer primarily occurring in children and young adults. Over the past few years, the deregulation of a superfamily transcription factors, known as forkhead box (FOX) proteins, has been demonstrated to contribute to the pathogenesis of osteosarcoma. Molecular mechanism studies have demonstrated that FOX family proteins participate in a variety of signaling pathways and that their expression can be regulated by multiple factors. The dysfunction of FOX genes can alter osteosarcoma cell differentiation, metastasis and progression. In this review, we summarized the evidence that FOX genes play direct or indirect roles in the development and progression of osteosarcoma, and evaluated the emerging role of FOX proteins as targets for therapeutic intervention.
Forkhead box (FOX) proteins are a large family of transcription factors with important functions in multiple biological processes, such as cell cycle control, cell differentiation, proliferation and development 1-4. Hundreds of FOX genes have been identified in mammals, including 50 members of the human genome and 44 members of the mouse genome 5. FOX proteins are defined based on the forkhead box (also known as FKH domain), a DNA binding motif containing 80 to 100 amino acids (as shown in Figure 1) 1-4. Based on similarities in the FKH domain, FOX proteins can be divided into 19 subclasses from FOXA to FOXS 1, 5. Although FOX proteins share structural similarities in DNA binding motifs, these proteins significantly differ in terms of expression pattern, regulation and function 6.
Figure 1
Schematic diagram illustrating the FOX protein domains. All FOX proteins contain a FDH domain, but significantly varying for other domains. FDH, forkhead DNA-binding domain; TAD, transactivation domain; ID, inhibitory domain; NRD, N-terminal repressor domain; NLS, nuclear localization sequence; NES, nuclear export sequence; TRD, transcriptional repressor domain; LZ, leucine zipper.
Genetic analyses indicated that many of these FOX genes are differentially expressed in a variety of diseases, including cancer 1-8. Several FOX subfamilies, such as FOXA, FOXC, FOXM, FOXO and FOXP, are associated with tumorigenesis and cancer progression, playing roles as either oncogenes or tumor suppressors, depending on the family member and cell type 1, 2, 9. Three FOX subfamilies, including FOXA, FOXM and FOXO, have been well studied for their functions in cancer 1-9. Expression of FOXA1 is aberrant in a number of cancer types such as acute myeloid leukemia (AML) 10, 11 lung 12, breast and prostate cancers 10, 13, 14, in which FOXA1 primarily functions as a critical transcription factor to regulate expression of the nuclear hormone receptors, estrogen receptor-α (ER), and androgen receptor (AR) 10, 15. Most recently, the results from chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-Seq) revealed that the genes targeted by FOXA1 are most commonly expressed in liver, prostate and breast cancer cells 16. In addition, cell-specific FOXA1 regulation was also demonstrated that it contributed to unique FOXA1 binding, genetic variations, and/or potential epigenetic regulation 16. FOXM1 is a proto-oncogene, and its upregulation has been observed in many humancancers, including lung 17, liver 18, prostate 19, breast 20, and pancreatic cancers 21. The upregulation of FOXM1 promotes tumorigenesis through multiple mechanisms, including the expansion of stem/progenitor cells, modulation of the epigenome, induction of genomic instability, regulation of cell proliferation, progression of the cell cycle and differentiation of cells 17-23. In mammals, there are four FOXO genes, FOXO1, 3, 4, and 6, which play important roles as tumor suppressors in a variety of cancers through diverse mechanisms, such as initiating apoptosis, prompting cell cycle arrest, and regulating the expression of genes that facilitate DNA repair 24-26. Members of FOXOs are also regulated by the insulin/PI3K/AKT (phosphorylated by phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase) signaling pathway 24-26.
Expression of FOX genes in osteosarcoma
Emerging evidence has indicated that the expression of FOX genes, including FOXC2
27, FOXF1 28, FOXL1 29, FOXM1 30, 31, FOXO1 32, 33 and FOXP2 34, is disrupted in osteosarcoma cells and primary tumor biopsy samples. As shown in Table 1, according to their expression in osteosarcoma cells and primary tumor biopsy samples, these FOX genes can be divided into two groups: oncogenes and anti-oncogenes. Oncogenes primarily include FOXC2, FOXM1 and FOXP2, and the elevated expression level of these genes has been observed in osteosarcoma cells, which is positively correlated with tumor size, clinical stage, pathological facture, and distant metastasis 27-29. Anti-oncogenes primarily include FOXF1, FOXL1 and FOXO1, and decreased or absent expression levels of these genes were examined in osteosarcoma cells and primary tumor biopsy samples 30-34.
Table 1
Expression and functions of FOX family genes in osteosarcoma cells
Gene
Expression
Osteosarcoma cells
Function
Reference
FOXC2
Upregulated
143B, U2OS
Regulating osteosarcoma invasion and metastasis
[27]
FOXF1
Downregulated
U2OS, SaOS-2
Functioning as a target of the p53 family to regulate cancer cell migration and invasiveness
[28, 81]
FOXL1
Downregulated
U2OS, SaOS-2, MG-63
Regulating osteosarcoma cell growth through induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis
[29]
FOXM1
Upregulated
HOS, U2OS, SOSP-9607, MG-63, 143B and SaOS-2
Functioning as a target of miR-370 to regulate cell growth and metastasis
[31]
FOXO1
Downregulated
U2OS, SaOS-2, MG-63
FOXO1 inhibits osteosarcoma oncogenesis via Wnt/beta-catenin pathway suppression
[32]
FOXP2
Upregulated
MG-63, 143B, U2OS
Regulating a p21-dependent growth arrest checkpoint
[34]
Roles of FOX genes in osteosarcoma
Oncogenes
FOXC2
FOXC2 is also called mesenchyme fork head protein 1 (MFH1), and this protein plays a role in early kidney and heart development 35. In recent years, elevated expression of FOXC2 has been detected in different cancer cells, such as non-small-cell lung cancer 36, 37, colorectal 38, esophageal 39, breast 40 and gastric cancers 41. Current views on the function and molecular mechanisms of FOXC2 reveal that this protein plays multiple roles in cancer progression and metastasis by affecting different targets 36-41. For example, FOXC2 directly binds and induces the transcription of some receptors, such as CXCR4 (C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4, also known as fusin or cluster of differentiation 184) and integrin β3 42. CXCR-4 is an alpha-chemokine receptor that is specific for stromal-derived-factor-1 (SDF-1), and this factor has been identified as a prognostic marker in various types of cancers 43. Integrin β3 is critical for tumor invasion, neoangiogenesis, and inflammation 44. FOXC2 also induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and serves as a link between EMT and stem cell properties in breast cancer 45. In addition, FOXC2 overexpression induces MET expression and activates the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-MET signaling pathway, thereby promoting the invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer cells 38.Recently, FOXC2 has been demonstrated to augment tumor propagation and metastasis in osteosarcoma by directly targeting CXCR4 (Figure 2A) 27. The elevated expression of FOXC2 was also observed in different osteosarcoma cell lines and osteosarcoma samples from patients 27. Further analysis indicated that FOXC2 overexpression was critical for maintaining osteosarcoma cells in a stem-like state, and anoikis conditions could induce FOXC2 expression 27. Specific knockdown of FOXC2 expression using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) decreased osteosarcoma cell metastasis and attenuated the anchorage-independent growth and invasion of osteosarcoma cells in vitro 27. In addition, downregulation of FOXC2 also resulted in decreased CXCR4 mRNA levels and reduced CXCR4-luciferase promoter activity 27. Interestingly, ectopic expression of CXCR4 restored the invasive capabilities of FOXC2 knockdown cells in vitro and in vivo, indicating that CXCR4 is a downstream target of FOXC2 in osteosarcoma 27.
Figure 2
Molecular mechanisms of oncogenic FOX proteins in osteosarcoma. (A) FOXC2 directly targets CXCR4, which may further interact with SDF-1, and the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis affects the growth, angiogenesis and metastasis of cancer. (B) A microRNA, known as miR-370, binds to the 3'-UTR of FOXM1 and negatively regulates its expression. The increased expression of FOXM1 in osteosarcoma can lead to decreased E-cadherin, thereby regulating osteosarcoma cell growth and metastasis. (C) Elevated FOXP2 expression in osteosarcoma upregulates p21WAF1/CIP1 and induces osteosarcoma cell growth arrest.
FOXM1
FOXM1 is a well-known member of the FOX family, and its overexpression has been widely reported in different cancers, such as breast 46, prostate 47, colorectal 48, liver 49, pancreatic 50, and lung cancers 51. Molecular mechanism studies have revealed that FOXM1 functions in a variety of biological processes, including cell cycle progression, cell proliferation, tumor angiogenesis, apoptosis, cell migration and cell invasion 46-51. Growing evidence indicates that FOXM1 controls the G1/S to G2/M phase transition and is also involved in M phase progression 52, 53. FOXM1 has been reported to regulate the expression a number of genes involved in the cell cycle, such as CDC25A and B, Cyclin B, Aurora B, SKP2, CKS1, centromere protein A (CENPA), CENPB and CENPF 54, 55. In addition, FOXM1 also interacts with B-Myb and MuvB, and the latter gene can be recruited to chromatin through a cell cycle homology (CHR) element 56. Knockdown of FOXM1 in multiple cancer cells (e.g., lung, liver, colon and breast) leads to the reduction of cell proliferation 23, 57, 58. FOXM1 can directly bind the promoter of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and activate its expression, thereby facilitating VEGF-induced angiogenesis in tumor cells 59. Inhibition of FOXM1 can sensitize humancancer cells to apoptosis induced by proteasome inhibitors, including MG132, bortezomib and thiostrepton 60. In a number of cancers, such as pancreatic, breast and colorectal cancer, FOXM1 has been reported to regulate the expression of two matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) genes, including MMP-2 and MMP-9, thereby affecting cancer cell migration and invasion 61-64.Most recently, FOXM1 was identified as highly expressed in osteosarcomapatient tissues, and overexpression of this protein was correlated with poor prognosis 30, 31. In addition, FOXM1 expression was also markedly increased in osteosarcoma cells 31. To elucidate the factors that regulate FOXM1 expression, we examined the microRNA levels in osteosarcoma cells and observed that miR-370 is significantly upregulated and can specifically target the 3'-UTR of FOXM1 31. In addition, in osteosarcoma cells overexpressed FOXM1 and miR-370, the decreased E-cadherin expression and increased N-cadherin expression were observed 31. Thus, our recent studies have revealed that miR-370 regulates the expression of FOXM1 in osteosarcoma cells, thus affecting cell growth and metastasis (Figure 2B) 31.
FOXP2
FOXP2 is a molecule that is required for neurobiology, and its mutation or depletion of expression often results in speech and language disorders 65. In recent years, its role in cancer has also been evaluated, but the results were controversial. Campbell et al. showed that FOXP2 was overexpressed in lymphoma cells compared to normal counterparts 66. In a tissue microarray containing samples from more than 11,000 prostate cancerpatients, Stumm et al. observed 19% of samples with weak FOXP2 staining, 34% of samples with moderate staining, and 41% of samples with strong staining 67. However, Cuiffo et al. showed that FOXP2 expression was significantly repressed in breast cancer cells and that its downregulation could trigger tumor initiation and metastasis 68. In addition, FOXP2 also participates in regulating the expression of a number of genes involved in tumor signaling pathways, including Wnt 69, NF-κB (nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) 70, and IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor 1) 71. Importantly, FOXP2 interacts with C-terminal binding protein 1 (CTBP1) 72, a transcriptional corepressor that targets and regulates the expression of tumor suppressors, such as PTEN, p16 and BAX 73.Recently, Gascoyne et al. identified both FOXP2 mRNA and protein levels were highly expressed in an osteosarcoma cell line (Saos-2) 34. Treatment with a combination of Vitamin D3 and TGF-β on MG-63osteosarcoma cells resulted in cell growth arrest at sub-confluence and induction of alkaline phosphatase activity, but not induction of FOXP2 expression 34. However, the FOXP2 mRNA levels were extremely elevated when MG-63 cells were treated with vehicle 34. Interestingly, FOXP2 expression was significantly induced when osteosarcoma cell lines with a minimal basal FOXP2 level were cultured to confluency, which was associated with growth arrest and minimal apoptosis 34. Subsequent analysis indicated that this induction was coincident with strongly induced p21CIP1/WAF1, a critical cell cycle inhibitor (Figure 2C) 34, but the underlying mechanism is still unclear.
Anti-oncogenes
FOXF1
FOXF1 is implicated in a variety of cancers with controversial roles. In humanprostate cancer cells, genome-wide array analysis revealed that the FOXF1 mRNA level was significantly reduced compared with that in normal prostate cells 74. In breast cancer cells, FOXF1 expression is aberrantly repressed through epigenetic mechanisms (DNA hypermethylation in the promoter region) 75. Overexpression of FOXF1 in breast cancer cells suppresses cell proliferation and tumorigenicity 75. Further analysis indicated that FOXF1 inhibited the activation of CDK2, thereby affecting the signaling of the CDK2-RB-E2F cascade, resulting in blockage of the G1-S transition 75. In colon cancer cells, FOXF1 expression was decreased, triggering the ATM/ATR-mediated DNA damage response and activating the p53-p21WAF1 checkpoint pathway 76. However, elevated FOXF1 levels were also observed in some cancers, such as basal cell carcinoma 77, medulloblastoma 78, rhabdomyosarcomas 78, 79 and Hedgehog (HH)-positive non-small cell lung cancers, compared to healthy cells 78, 80, implying that FOXF1 might function as an oncogene.Studies regarding the function of FOXF1 in osteosarcoma cells are poor, and only two studies have shown that FOXF1 expression is decreased in osteosarcoma cells. The first study revealed that FOXF1 is critical for the migration of mesenchymal cells through induction of Integrin-beta3 expression 28, and these authors only used U2OSosteosarcoma cells as a control to determine the FOXF1 level, but did not illuminate its function in osteosarcoma cells 28. In the second independent study, Tamura et al. showed that FOXF1 knockdown could stimulate cancer cell invasion and migration in Saos-2osteosarcoma cells 81, and further studies indicated that FOXF1, a target of the p53 family, is upregulated by p53, TAp63 and TAp73 81. FOXF1 can regulate the expression of E-cadherin by directly binding to a conserved motif (ATAAATAAATA) located in the E-cadherin promoter region (Figure 3A) 81. These results strongly suggested that FOXF1 might function as a tumor suppressor in osteosarcoma cells 28, 81.
Figure 3
Molecular mechanisms of FOXF1 and FOXL1 in osteosarcoma. (A) p53, TAp63 and TAp73 upregulates FOXF1 expression, and the activated FOXF1 can further decrease E-cadherin expression by directly binding to its promoter, thereby inhibiting osteosarcoma cell invasion and migration. (B) The overexpression of FOXL1 in osteosarcoma cells induced the expression of p21 and p27, and resulted in cell cycle arrest, eventually leading to inhibition of cell proliferation.
FOXL1
In the mesenchyme of the gastrointestinal tract, FOXL1 was initially implicated in the regulation of the Wnt/APC (Adenomatous Polyposis Coli)/beta-catenin pathway 82. FOXL1 was also repressed, and this protein plays a role as a tumor suppressor to inhibit cell proliferation and invasion in certain cancers, including colonic 82, pancreatic 83 and gallbladder cancer cells 84. In colonic cancer, FOXL1 deficiency increased the gastrointestinal tumor load and accelerated tumor initiation in APCMin mice 82. In pancreatic cancer, lower FOXL1 expression was associated with increased cancer-specific mortality 83. Overexpression of FOXL1 induced expression of TRAIL (TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand) and promoted apoptosis 83. Moreover, FOXL1 also suppressed ZEB1 (zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1) transcription by directly binding to its promoter, thereby affecting cancer cell invasion and aggressiveness, reflecting the fact that ZEB1 is an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) activator 83. In gallbladder cancer, decreased expression of FOXL1 was observed in both tissues and cell lines 84. Overexpression of FOXL1 in gallbladder NOZ cells could trigger mitochondria-mediated apoptosis, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation, migration and invasion in vitro 84. Additionally, FOXL1 overexpression suppressed ZEB1 expression, induced E-cadherin expression in NOZ cells, and eventually affected cell migration and invasion 84.Interestingly, recent studies have also indicated that FOXL1 is downregulated in osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines with poor prognosis 29. Overexpression of FOXL1 in osteosarcomaU2OS cells inhibited cell proliferation and induced expression of p21 and p27, leading to U2OS cell arrest at the G1 phase (Figure 3B) 29. Moreover, FOXL1 overexpression induced cytochrome c release and disrupted mitochondrial transmembrane depolarization, thereby triggering apoptosis 29.
FOXO1
FOXO1 plays fundamental roles in regulating the reactions of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis through insulin signaling 85. Interestingly, the transcriptional activity of FOXO1 is controlled by its phosphorylation state at the Thr-24, Ser-256, and Ser-319 sites 86. In the non-phosphorylated state, FOXO1 is localized in the nucleus and binds to the conserved insulin response sequence located in the promoter of glucose 6-phosphatase 85, 86. However, when it is phosphorylated by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase PI3K/AKT (RAC-alpha serine/threonine-protein kinase) pathway, FOXO1 transports from the nucleus to the cytoplasm 85, 86, and this modification subsequently decreases glucose production through a decrease in glucose 6-phosphatase transcription 85, 86. FOXO1 protein also acts as a tumor suppressor in cancer 87. Depleted or decreased expression of FOXO1 has been demonstrated in a number of tumors, including breast, pancreatic, prostate, cervical, endometrial and renal cancers 87. In which, FOXO1 expression can be downregulated by many factors, including miRNAs (miR-9, -27, -96, -153, -182, -183, and -186) 88, 89, estrogen 90 and epidermal growth factor 91. FOXO1 participates in the regulation of a number of cell cycle regulatory proteins, such as cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (p27KIP1, p21WAF1, p130, cyclin G2, cyclin D1 and D2) 92, 93, and this protein can also regulate the apoptosis mediators Bim, Fas ligand and Bcl-6 94.Several recent studies have revealed that FOXO1 expression is suppressed in osteosarcoma tissues and cells. Chang et al. showed that liver X receptor α (LXRα) could directly bind to the promoter and activate the expression of FOXO1, eventually resulting in inhibition of osteosarcoma cell proliferation (Figure 4A) 95. Jin et al. demonstrated that Grifolin, a natural-derived small molecule, could inhibit AKT activity, thereby suppressing the phosphorylation of its substrates, including FOXO1 and GSK3 (glycogen synthase kinase 3) (Figure 4B), inducing mitochondria-dependent apoptosis 96. Pei et al. showed that miR-135b directly targeted the 3'-UTR of FOXO1 and that the decreased expression of FOXO1 in osteosarcoma cells was inversely correlated with miR-135b expression (Figure 4C) 97. Interestingly, FOXO1 knockdown could reverse the effects of miR-135b inhibitor-induced proliferation and invasion in osteosarcoma cells 97. Recently, Guan et al. showed that FOXO1 at least partially inhibited osteosarcoma oncogenesis by suppression of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Figure 4D) 32. In a study containing 34 osteosarcoma cases, the whole-genome sequencing results demonstrated that the FOXO1 locus had varied copy numbers and showed a loss of heterozygosity, suggesting that chromosomal alterations might contribute to the decrease in FOXO1 expression 32. Overexpression of FOXO1 in osteosarcoma cells could lead to increased expression of p27KIP1, TP53INP1 (p53-induced-nuclear-protein 1), BCL2L11/BIM (Bcl-2-like protein 11), NOXA and TRAIL as well as decreased expression of Cyclin D1, thereby inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis 32. Importantly, overexpression of FOXO1 significantly impaired Wnt/β-catenin activity. Moreover, inhibition of FOXO1 by its specific inhibitor AS1842856 could inhibit cell differentiation and promote cell survival 32.
Figure 4
Molecular mechanisms of FOXO1 in osteosarcoma. (A) Liver X receptor α (LXRα) can directly bind to the promoter of FOXO1 and activate its expression, eventually resulting in inhibition of osteosarcoma cell proliferation. (B) The small molecule Grifolin inhibits the activity of AKT and causes the suppression of FOXO1 and GSK3 phosphorylation, thereby inducing apoptosis and inhibiting cell proliferation. (B) miR-135b binds to the 3'-UTR of FOXO1 and negatively regulates its expression, thereby promoting osteosarcoma cell growth and invasion. (D) Overexpression of FOXO1 in osteosarcoma cells can increase the expression of p27, TP53INP1 BIM, NOXA and TRAIL and significantly impair Wnt/β-catenin activity, eventually leading to the inhibition of osteosarcoma cell survival.
Targeting FOX genes in osteosarcoma therapy
In recent years, considerable efforts have been made to validate FOX proteins as preferential targets in cancer therapy. However, limited information is available for targeting FOX proteins in osteosarcoma therapy. Collectively, four strategies based on targeting FOX proteins have been developed or are currently under development to inhibit tumor growth. These four promising approaches include (1) small molecules targeting FOX proteins; (2) targeting FOX genes via a CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing tool; (3) developing FOX protein derived peptides for immunotherapy; and (4) targeting molecules or signaling pathways that FOX proteins are involved in (indirect ways).
Small molecules that direct target FOX proteins
The discovery of small molecules as anti-tumor drugs has been significantly developed in the past decade. However, small molecules that directly target FOX proteins have not been extensively reported in cancer therapy, particularly in osteosarcoma therapy. Among the above-mentioned oncogenes (FOXC2, FOXM1 and FOXP2), only FOXM1 was reported to be directly targeted by a number of small molecules. For example, thiostrepton, a natural-derived small molecule, inhibits FOXM1 mRNA and protein levels in breast cancerMCF-7 cells, resulting in induction of apoptosis, primarily by caspase-dependent intrinsic and extrinsic pathways 98. By applying a high-throughput screen containing a total number of 54,211 small molecules, FDI-6 (NCGC00099374) was shown to block the binding of FOXM1 to its target DNA in MCF-7 cells, resulting in the inactivation of FOXM1 target genes 99. Siomycin A, an inhibitor of FOXM1, could suppress the expression of FOXM1 at both transcriptional and translational levels in osteosarcomaU2OS cells and inhibit the downstream target genes of FOXM1, such as CDC25B, Survivin, and CENPB
100. For those anti-oncogenes (FOXF1, FOXL1 and FOXO1), screening strategies to identify molecules that reactivate endogenous FOX proteins are currently being developed. A small molecule known as methylseleninic acid (MSA) in Ewing sarcoma cells increased endogenous FOXO1 expression in a dose- and time-dependent manner 101. However, it is still absent for small molecules that function to reactivate the expression of FOX genes in osteosarcoma cells.
CRISPR/Cas9 method edits FOX genes
The faster development of the CRISPR/Cas9 (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR-associated 9) genome editing tool makes it is easy to knockout, knockdown or activate a gene 102. Currently, CRISPR/Cas9 knockout or knockin kits of these oncogenic and anti-oncogenic FOX genes are commercially available, providing effective methods for researchers to evaluate FOX gene functions in osteosarcoma therapy. Although the oncogenic and anti-oncogenic FOX genes have not been reported to be direct targets via CRISPR/Cas9 methods in cancer therapy, this tool has been suggested to benefit future cancer therapy approaches through direct targeting of interested genes, including FOX genes.
Immunotherapy
The oncogenic FOX genes have the potential to serve as adequate targets for cancer immunotherapy, as these genes are overexpressed in various cancers. Among these genes, FOXM1 has been reported to be a candidate target for anti-tumor immunotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma 103. The investigation of 23 humanFOXM1-derived peptides predicted to bind to human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-restricted T cells revealed three peptides, including FOXM1362-370 (YLVPIQFPV), FOXM1373-382 (SLVLQPSVKV), and FOXM1640-649 (GLMDLSTTPL) could induce HLA-A2-restricted T cells, suggesting that FOXM1 might be a suitable target for immunotherapy against various cancers, including osteosarcoma 103.
Other indirect strategies
Given that FOX proteins participate in or cross-talk with a variety of signaling pathways, these proteins can be regulated by a number of proteins and miRNAs, and the expression of FOX genes is frequently affected when researchers target other molecules in cancer therapy. For example, suppression of PI3K using its specific inhibitor LY294002 resulted in decreased expression of FOXM1 in humanU2OSosteosarcoma cells 104, 105. As previously described, FOXO1 is the target of miR-96 and miR-182, thus treatment with two synthetic antisense inhibitors, including anti-miR-96 and anti-miR-182, in hepatocellular carcinoma and prostate cancer induced FOXO1 expression 106, 107. In addition, inhibition of the EGFR (epidermal growth factor) signaling pathway using antibodies (such as trastuzumab or cetuximab) or small molecules (such as lapatinib and gefitinib) could induce expression of FOXO3
2, 108.
Summary and Perspective
Obviously, the deregulation of FOX proteins is frequently associated with tumorigenesis, and these proteins participate in a wide spectrum of cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, senescence and apoptosis. Interestingly, both oncogenic and anti-oncogenic FOX proteins are shown in different types of cancers, implying the complexity of these family protein functions. Although FOX proteins are a superfamily comprising 50 members in the human genome, only a few of these proteins have been examined and studied in humanosteosarcoma. Additional efforts to explore the precise mechanisms of FOX proteins in tumorigenesis should be conducted in the future, particularly in osteosarcoma.Emerging evidence suggests that FOX proteins could be intriguing targets for anticancer therapies, including anti-osteosarcoma therapy. Although current views consider that transcription factors are rarely utilized as direct targets, a number of studies are currently investigating FOX proteins as direct or indirect targets to prevent cancer development and progression. The identification of small molecules that selectively block the function of FOX proteins would be a useful step toward designing FOX-specific inhibitors. We expect that FOX-specific inhibitors will be successfully developed and utilized in humancancer therapies. With the rapid development of CRIPSR/Cas9 technology, we propose that this tool will significantly enhance cancer therapy by targeting FOX genes in the coming years.
Authors: Jamila Laoukili; Matthijs R H Kooistra; Alexandra Brás; Jos Kauw; Ron M Kerkhoven; Ashby Morrison; Hans Clevers; René H Medema Journal: Nat Cell Biol Date: 2005-01-16 Impact factor: 28.824
Authors: Patricia A Madureira; Rana Varshochi; Demetra Constantinidou; Richard E Francis; R Charles Coombes; Kwok-Ming Yao; Eric W-F Lam Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2006-06-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: J E Vivienne Watson; Norman A Doggett; Donna G Albertson; Armann Andaya; Arul Chinnaiyan; Herman van Dekken; David Ginzinger; Christopher Haqq; Karen James; Sherwin Kamkar; David Kowbel; Daniel Pinkel; Lars Schmitt; Jeffry P Simko; Stanislav Volik; Vivian K Weinberg; Pamela L Paris; Colin Collins Journal: Oncogene Date: 2004-04-22 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Il-Man Kim; Timothy Ackerson; Sneha Ramakrishna; Maria Tretiakova; I-Ching Wang; Tanya V Kalin; Michael L Major; Galina A Gusarova; Helena M Yoder; Robert H Costa; Vladimir V Kalinichenko Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-02-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Daniel M DeLaughter; Danos C Christodoulou; Jamille Y Robinson; Christine E Seidman; H Scott Baldwin; J G Seidman; Joey V Barnett Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2013-04-01 Impact factor: 5.000