Literature DB >> 25157146

Comparative analysis of pseudogenes across three phyla.

Cristina Sisu1, Baikang Pei2, Jing Leng2, Adam Frankish3, Yan Zhang2, Suganthi Balasubramanian4, Rachel Harte5, Daifeng Wang2, Michael Rutenberg-Schoenberg2, Wyatt Clark2, Mark Diekhans5, Joel Rozowsky4, Tim Hubbard3, Jennifer Harrow3, Mark B Gerstein6.   

Abstract

Pseudogenes are degraded fossil copies of genes. Here, we report a comparison of pseudogenes spanning three phyla, leveraging the completed annotations of the human, worm, and fly genomes, which we make available as an online resource. We find that pseudogenes are lineage specific, much more so than protein-coding genes, reflecting the different remodeling processes marking each organism's genome evolution. The majority of human pseudogenes are processed, resulting from a retrotranspositional burst at the dawn of the primate lineage. This burst can be seen in the largely uniform distribution of pseudogenes across the genome, their preservation in areas with low recombination rates, and their preponderance in highly expressed gene families. In contrast, worm and fly pseudogenes tell a story of numerous duplication events. In worm, these duplications have been preserved through selective sweeps, so we see a large number of pseudogenes associated with highly duplicated families such as chemoreceptors. However, in fly, the large effective population size and high deletion rate resulted in a depletion of the pseudogene complement. Despite large variations between these species, we also find notable similarities. Overall, we identify a broad spectrum of biochemical activity for pseudogenes, with the majority in each organism exhibiting varying degrees of partial activity. In particular, we identify a consistent amount of transcription (∼15%) across all species, suggesting a uniform degradation process. Also, we see a uniform decay of pseudogene promoter activity relative to their coding counterparts and identify a number of pseudogenes with conserved upstream sequences and activity, hinting at potential regulatory roles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  functional genomics; genome annotation; transcriptomics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25157146      PMCID: PMC4169933          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407293111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  51 in total

1.  Pseudogene evolution and natural selection for a compact genome.

Authors:  D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

2.  Molecular fossils in the human genome: identification and analysis of the pseudogenes in chromosomes 21 and 22.

Authors:  Paul M Harrison; Hedi Hegyi; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Nicholas M Luscombe; Paul Bertone; Nathaniel Echols; Ted Johnson; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Comprehensive analysis of amino acid and nucleotide composition in eukaryotic genomes, comparing genes and pseudogenes.

Authors:  Nathaniel Echols; Paul Harrison; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Nicholas M Luscombe; Paul Bertone; Zhaolei Zhang; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  SNPs on human chromosomes 21 and 22 -- analysis in terms of protein features and pseudogenes.

Authors:  Suganthi Balasubramanian; Paul Harrison; Hedi Hegyi; Paul Bertone; Nicholas Luscombe; Nathaniel Echols; Patrick McGarvey; ZhaoLei Zhang; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.533

5.  Digging for dead genes: an analysis of the characteristics of the pseudogene population in the Caenorhabditis elegans genome.

Authors:  P M Harrison; N Echols; M B Gerstein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-02-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The complete human olfactory subgenome.

Authors:  G Glusman; I Yanai; I Rubin; D Lancet
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Genome evolution and developmental constraint in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Cristian I Castillo-Davis; Daniel L Hartl
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome.

Authors:  Kerstin Howe; Matthew D Clark; Carlos F Torroja; James Torrance; Camille Berthelot; Matthieu Muffato; John E Collins; Sean Humphray; Karen McLaren; Lucy Matthews; Stuart McLaren; Ian Sealy; Mario Caccamo; Carol Churcher; Carol Scott; Jeffrey C Barrett; Romke Koch; Gerd-Jörg Rauch; Simon White; William Chow; Britt Kilian; Leonor T Quintais; José A Guerra-Assunção; Yi Zhou; Yong Gu; Jennifer Yen; Jan-Hinnerk Vogel; Tina Eyre; Seth Redmond; Ruby Banerjee; Jianxiang Chi; Beiyuan Fu; Elizabeth Langley; Sean F Maguire; Gavin K Laird; David Lloyd; Emma Kenyon; Sarah Donaldson; Harminder Sehra; Jeff Almeida-King; Jane Loveland; Stephen Trevanion; Matt Jones; Mike Quail; Dave Willey; Adrienne Hunt; John Burton; Sarah Sims; Kirsten McLay; Bob Plumb; Joy Davis; Chris Clee; Karen Oliver; Richard Clark; Clare Riddle; David Elliot; David Eliott; Glen Threadgold; Glenn Harden; Darren Ware; Sharmin Begum; Beverley Mortimore; Beverly Mortimer; Giselle Kerry; Paul Heath; Benjamin Phillimore; Alan Tracey; Nicole Corby; Matthew Dunn; Christopher Johnson; Jonathan Wood; Susan Clark; Sarah Pelan; Guy Griffiths; Michelle Smith; Rebecca Glithero; Philip Howden; Nicholas Barker; Christine Lloyd; Christopher Stevens; Joanna Harley; Karen Holt; Georgios Panagiotidis; Jamieson Lovell; Helen Beasley; Carl Henderson; Daria Gordon; Katherine Auger; Deborah Wright; Joanna Collins; Claire Raisen; Lauren Dyer; Kenric Leung; Lauren Robertson; Kirsty Ambridge; Daniel Leongamornlert; Sarah McGuire; Ruth Gilderthorp; Coline Griffiths; Deepa Manthravadi; Sarah Nichol; Gary Barker; Siobhan Whitehead; Michael Kay; Jacqueline Brown; Clare Murnane; Emma Gray; Matthew Humphries; Neil Sycamore; Darren Barker; David Saunders; Justene Wallis; Anne Babbage; Sian Hammond; Maryam Mashreghi-Mohammadi; Lucy Barr; Sancha Martin; Paul Wray; Andrew Ellington; Nicholas Matthews; Matthew Ellwood; Rebecca Woodmansey; Graham Clark; James D Cooper; James Cooper; Anthony Tromans; Darren Grafham; Carl Skuce; Richard Pandian; Robert Andrews; Elliot Harrison; Andrew Kimberley; Jane Garnett; Nigel Fosker; Rebekah Hall; Patrick Garner; Daniel Kelly; Christine Bird; Sophie Palmer; Ines Gehring; Andrea Berger; Christopher M Dooley; Zübeyde Ersan-Ürün; Cigdem Eser; Horst Geiger; Maria Geisler; Lena Karotki; Anette Kirn; Judith Konantz; Martina Konantz; Martina Oberländer; Silke Rudolph-Geiger; Mathias Teucke; Christa Lanz; Günter Raddatz; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Baoli Zhu; Amanda Rapp; Sara Widaa; Cordelia Langford; Fengtang Yang; Stephan C Schuster; Nigel P Carter; Jennifer Harrow; Zemin Ning; Javier Herrero; Steve M J Searle; Anton Enright; Robert Geisler; Ronald H A Plasterk; Charles Lee; Monte Westerfield; Pieter J de Jong; Leonard I Zon; John H Postlethwait; Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard; Tim J P Hubbard; Hugues Roest Crollius; Jane Rogers; Derek L Stemple
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Comparative analysis of the transcriptome across distant species.

Authors:  Mark B Gerstein; Joel Rozowsky; Koon-Kiu Yan; Daifeng Wang; Chao Cheng; James B Brown; Carrie A Davis; LaDeana Hillier; Cristina Sisu; Jingyi Jessica Li; Baikang Pei; Arif O Harmanci; Michael O Duff; Sarah Djebali; Roger P Alexander; Burak H Alver; Raymond Auerbach; Kimberly Bell; Peter J Bickel; Max E Boeck; Nathan P Boley; Benjamin W Booth; Lucy Cherbas; Peter Cherbas; Chao Di; Alex Dobin; Jorg Drenkow; Brent Ewing; Gang Fang; Megan Fastuca; Elise A Feingold; Adam Frankish; Guanjun Gao; Peter J Good; Roderic Guigó; Ann Hammonds; Jen Harrow; Roger A Hoskins; Cédric Howald; Long Hu; Haiyan Huang; Tim J P Hubbard; Chau Huynh; Sonali Jha; Dionna Kasper; Masaomi Kato; Thomas C Kaufman; Robert R Kitchen; Erik Ladewig; Julien Lagarde; Eric Lai; Jing Leng; Zhi Lu; Michael MacCoss; Gemma May; Rebecca McWhirter; Gennifer Merrihew; David M Miller; Ali Mortazavi; Rabi Murad; Brian Oliver; Sara Olson; Peter J Park; Michael J Pazin; Norbert Perrimon; Dmitri Pervouchine; Valerie Reinke; Alexandre Reymond; Garrett Robinson; Anastasia Samsonova; Gary I Saunders; Felix Schlesinger; Anurag Sethi; Frank J Slack; William C Spencer; Marcus H Stoiber; Pnina Strasbourger; Andrea Tanzer; Owen A Thompson; Kenneth H Wan; Guilin Wang; Huaien Wang; Kathie L Watkins; Jiayu Wen; Kejia Wen; Chenghai Xue; Li Yang; Kevin Yip; Chris Zaleski; Yan Zhang; Henry Zheng; Steven E Brenner; Brenton R Graveley; Susan E Celniker; Thomas R Gingeras; Robert Waterston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  The GENCODE pseudogene resource.

Authors:  Baikang Pei; Cristina Sisu; Adam Frankish; Cédric Howald; Lukas Habegger; Xinmeng Jasmine Mu; Rachel Harte; Suganthi Balasubramanian; Andrea Tanzer; Mark Diekhans; Alexandre Reymond; Tim J Hubbard; Jennifer Harrow; Mark B Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  37 in total

1.  Origination and Function of Plant Pseudogenes.

Authors:  Jianbo Xie; Sisi Chen; Weijie Xu; Yiyang Zhao; Deqiang Zhang
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2019-06-04

2.  Evolutionary Fates and Dynamic Functionalization of Young Duplicate Genes in Arabidopsis Genomes.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Feng Tao; Nicholas C Marowsky; Chuanzhu Fan
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  GENCODE Pseudogenes.

Authors:  Cristina Sisu
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Pseudogenes: Four Decades of Discovery.

Authors:  Leonardo Salmena
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

5.  FusionPro, a Versatile Proteogenomic Tool for Identification of Novel Fusion Transcripts and Their Potential Translation Products in Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Chae-Yeon Kim; Keun Na; Saeram Park; Seul-Ki Jeong; Jin-Young Cho; Heon Shin; Min Jung Lee; Gyoonhee Han; Young-Ki Paik
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  PseudoFuN: Deriving functional potentials of pseudogenes from integrative relationships with genes and microRNAs across 32 cancers.

Authors:  Travis S Johnson; Sihong Li; Eric Franz; Zhi Huang; Shuyu Dan Li; Moray J Campbell; Kun Huang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 7.  The state of play in higher eukaryote gene annotation.

Authors:  Jonathan M Mudge; Jennifer Harrow
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Network analysis of pseudogene-gene relationships: from pseudogene evolution to their functional potentials.

Authors:  Travis S Johnson; Sihong Li; Jonathan R Kho; Kun Huang; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Pac Symp Biocomput       Date:  2018

9.  Devising a Consensus Framework for Validation of Novel Human Coding Loci.

Authors:  Elspeth A Bruford; Lydie Lane; Jennifer Harrow
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.466

10.  Pseudogene Profiling for Cancer Subtype Classification.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Deyou Zheng
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.