Literature DB >> 25156155

Connections between permutation and t-tests: relevance to adaptive methods.

Michael Proschan1, Ekkehard Glimm, Martin Posch.   

Abstract

A permutation test assigns a p-value by conditioning on the data and treating the different possible treatment assignments as random. The fact that the conditional type I error rate given the data is controlled at level α ensures validity of the test even if certain adaptations are made. We show the connection between permutation and t-tests, and use this connection to explain why certain adaptations are valid in a t-test setting as well. We illustrate this with an example of blinded sample size recalculation.
Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive methods in clinical trials; asymptotic distribution; blinded sample size recalculation; complete sufficient statistic; p-value combination functions; permutation tests

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25156155      PMCID: PMC4682210          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  9 in total

1.  Internal pilot studies I: type I error rate of the naive t-test.

Authors:  J Wittes; O Schabenberger; D Zucker; E Brittain; M Proschan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Internal pilot studies II: comparison of various procedures.

Authors:  D M Zucker; J T Wittes; O Schabenberger; E Brittain
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Adaptive sample size calculations in group sequential trials.

Authors:  W Lehmacher; G Wassmer
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  On model prespecification in confirmatory randomized studies.

Authors:  D Edwards
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999-04-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Blinded sample size reassessment in non-inferiority and equivalence trials.

Authors:  Tim Friede; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Simple procedures for blinded sample size adjustment that do not affect the type I error rate.

Authors:  Meinhard Kieser; Tim Friede
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Blinded sample size re-estimation in crossover bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  Daniel Golkowski; Tim Friede; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 1.894

8.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses.

Authors:  P Bauer; K Köhne
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Unplanned adaptations before breaking the blind.

Authors:  Martin Posch; Michael A Proschan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.373

  9 in total
  6 in total

1.  Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls.

Authors:  Peter Bauer; Frank Bretz; Vladimir Dragalin; Franz König; Gernot Wassmer
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Probabilistic Decision-Making in Children With Dyslexia.

Authors:  Christa L Watson Pereira; Ran Zhou; Mark A Pitt; Jay I Myung; P Justin Rossi; Eduardo Caverzasi; Esther Rah; Isabel E Allen; Maria Luisa Mandelli; Marita Meyer; Zachary A Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno Tempini
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Global abundance estimates for 9,700 bird species.

Authors:  Corey T Callaghan; Shinichi Nakagawa; William K Cornwell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Maximum type I error rate inflation from sample size reassessment when investigators are blind to treatment labels.

Authors:  Magdalena Żebrowska; Martin Posch; Dominic Magirr
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Statistical analysis of Goal Attainment Scaling endpoints in randomised trials.

Authors:  S Urach; Cmw Gaasterland; M Posch; B Jilma; K Roes; G Rosenkranz; J H Van der Lee; R Ristl
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Estimation after blinded sample size reassessment.

Authors:  Martin Posch; Florian Klinglmueller; Franz König; Frank Miller
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2016-10-02       Impact factor: 3.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.