Literature DB >> 10611620

Internal pilot studies I: type I error rate of the naive t-test.

J Wittes1, O Schabenberger, D Zucker, E Brittain, M Proschan.   

Abstract

When sample size is recalculated using unblinded interim data, use of the usual t-test at the end of a study may lead to an elevated type I error rate. This paper describes a numerical quadrature investigation to calculate the true probability of rejection as a function of the time of the recalculation, the magnitude of the detectable treatment effect, and the ratio of the guessed to the true variance. We consider both 'restricted' designs, those that require final sample size at least as large as the originally calculated size, and 'unrestricted' designs, those that permit smaller final sample sizes than originally calculated. Our results indicate that the bias in the type I error rate is often negligible, especially in restricted designs. Some sets of parameters, however, induce non-trivial bias in the unrestricted design. Copyright 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10611620     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19991230)18:24<3481::aid-sim301>3.0.co;2-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  13 in total

1.  A power calculation guide for fMRI studies.

Authors:  Jeanette A Mumford
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Some Distributions and Their Implications for an Internal Pilot Study With a Univariate Linear Model.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 0.893

Review 3.  Two-stage designs in bioequivalence trials.

Authors:  Helmut Schütz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Designing a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for developing an adaptive treatment strategy.

Authors:  Daniel Almirall; Scott N Compton; Meredith Gunlicks-Stoessel; Naihua Duan; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Internal pilot design for balanced repeated measures.

Authors:  Xinrui Zhang; Keith E Muller; Maureen M Goodenow; Yueh-Yun Chi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Options and Considerations for Adaptive Laboratory Experiments.

Authors:  Lai Wei; David Jarjoura
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2014-11-25

7.  Connections between permutation and t-tests: relevance to adaptive methods.

Authors:  Michael Proschan; Ekkehard Glimm; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Statistical design of personalized medicine interventions: the Clarification of Optimal Anticoagulation through Genetics (COAG) trial.

Authors:  Benjamin French; Jungnam Joo; Nancy L Geller; Stephen E Kimmel; Yves Rosenberg; Jeffrey L Anderson; Brian F Gage; Julie A Johnson; Jonas H Ellenberg
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  An internal pilot design for prospective cancer screening trials with unknown disease prevalence.

Authors:  John T Brinton; Brandy M Ringham; Deborah H Glueck
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Bayesian updating: increasing sample size during the course of a study.

Authors:  Mirjam Moerbeek
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.