Literature DB >> 14652861

Simple procedures for blinded sample size adjustment that do not affect the type I error rate.

Meinhard Kieser1, Tim Friede.   

Abstract

For normally distributed data, determination of the appropriate sample size requires a knowledge of the variance. Because of the uncertainty in the planning phase, two-stage procedures are attractive where the variance is reestimated from a subsample and the sample size is adjusted if necessary. From a regulatory viewpoint, preserving blindness and maintaining the ability to calculate or control the type I error rate are essential. Recently, a number of proposals have been made for sample size adjustment procedures in the t-test situation. Unfortunately, none of these methods satisfy both these requirements. We show through analytical computations that the type I error rate of the t-test is not affected if simple blind variance estimators are used for sample size recalculation. Furthermore, the results for the expected power of the procedures demonstrate that the methods are effective in ensuring the desired power even under initial misspecification of the variance. A method is discussed that can be applied in a more general setting and that assumes analysis with a permutation test. This procedure maintains the significance level for any design situation and arbitrary blind sample size recalculation strategy. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14652861     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  25 in total

1.  Practical Methods for Bounding Type I Error Rate with an Internal Pilot Design.

Authors:  Christopher S Coffey; John A Kairalla; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.893

2.  GLUMIP 2.0: SAS/IML Software for Planning Internal Pilots.

Authors:  John A Kairalla; Christopher S Coffey; Keith E Muller
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 3.  OARSI Clinical Trials Recommendations: Key analytic considerations in design, analysis, and reporting of randomized controlled trials in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  E Losina; J Ranstam; J E Collins; T J Schnitzer; J N Katz
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 6.576

4.  Two-Stage Adaptive Designs for Three-Treatment Bioequivalence Studies.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; Adrian P Mander; James M S Wason
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 1.452

5.  Inhaled nitric oxide as temporary respiratory stabilization in patients with COVID-19 related respiratory failure (INOCOV): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jostein Skjalg Hagemo; Arne Kristian Skulberg; Marius Rehn; Morten Valberg; Maiju Pesonen; Hans Julius Heimdal; Fridtjof Heyerdahl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Connections between permutation and t-tests: relevance to adaptive methods.

Authors:  Michael Proschan; Ekkehard Glimm; Martin Posch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Unplanned adaptations before breaking the blind.

Authors:  Martin Posch; Michael A Proschan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Tibial nerve stimulation compared with sham to reduce incontinence in care home residents: ELECTRIC RCT.

Authors:  Joanne Booth; Lorna Aucott; Seonaidh Cotton; Bridget Davis; Linda Fenocchi; Claire Goodman; Suzanne Hagen; Danielle Harari; Maggie Lawrence; Andrew Lowndes; Lisa Macaulay; Graeme MacLennan; Helen Mason; Doreen McClurg; John Norrie; Christine Norton; Catriona O'Dolan; Dawn Skelton; Claire Surr; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 4.014

9.  The effect of inhaled IFN-β on worsening of asthma symptoms caused by viral infections. A randomized trial.

Authors:  Ratko Djukanović; Tim Harrison; Sebastian L Johnston; Flic Gabbay; Peter Wark; Neil C Thomson; Robert Niven; Dave Singh; Helen K Reddel; Donna E Davies; Richard Marsden; Christine Boxall; Sarah Dudley; Vincent Plagnol; Stephen T Holgate; Phillip Monk
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 10.  Sample size determinations in original research protocols for randomised clinical trials submitted to UK research ethics committees: review.

Authors:  Timothy Clark; Ursula Berger; Ulrich Mansmann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.