Literature DB >> 25153194

The contribution of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in clinical Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates: an emphasis on efflux pump activity.

Sung-Pin Tseng1, Wan-Chi Tsai2, Chih-Yuan Liang2, Yin-Shiou Lin2, Jun-Wei Huang2, Chung-Yu Chang3, Yu-Chang Tyan4, Po-Liang Lu5.   

Abstract

Due to the limited information of the contribution of various antibiotic resistance mechanisms in clinical Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates, Antibiotic resistance mechanisms, including integron analysis, identification of quinolone resistance-determining region mutations, measurement of efflux pump activity, and sequence analysis of efflux pump regulators, were investigated in 66 clinical B. cepacia complex isolates. Species were identified via recA-RFLP and MALDI-TOF. Four genomovars were identified by recA-RFLP. B. cenocepacia (genomovar III) was the most prevalent genomovar (90.1%). Most isolates (60/66, 90.9%) were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF analysis. Clonal relatedness determined by PFGE analysis revealed 30 pulsotypes, including two major pulsotypes that comprised 22.7% and 18.2% of the isolates, respectively. Seventeen (25.8%) isolates harboured class 1 integron with various combinations of resistance genes. Among six levofloxacin-resistant isolates, five had single-base substitutions in the gyrA gene and three demonstrated efflux pump activities. Among the 42 isolates exhibiting resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent, 94.4% ceftazidime-resistant isolates (17/18) and 72.7% chloramphenicol-resistant isolates (16/22) demonstrated efflux pump activity. Quantitation of efflux pump RNA level and sequence analysis revealed that over-expression of the RND-3 efflux pump was attributable to specific mutations in the RND-3 efflux pump regulator gene. In conclusion, high-level expression of efflux pumps is prevalent in B. cepacia complex isolates. Mutations in the RND-3 efflux pump regulator gene are the major cause of efflux pump activity, resulting in the resistance to antibiotics in clinical B. cepacia complex isolates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25153194      PMCID: PMC4143217          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0104986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The Burkholderia cepacia complex is comprised of Gram-negative, non-fermenting bacilli that are commonly found in natural and hospital environments [1], [2]. The B. cepacia complex includes at least nine species [2], [3]. Among B. cepacia complex infection in cases of cystic fibrosis, B. multivorans (genomovar II) and B. cenocepacia (genomovar III) are common and may cause outbreaks [1], [2]. B. cepacia complex has emerged as important pathogens in patients with cystic fibrosis and chronic granulomatous disease over the past two decades [4]–[6]. The difficulty in treating B. cepacia complex infections is attributed to its intrinsic resistance to multiple antibiotics and disinfectants [2], [7], [8]. The causes of multiple antibiotic resistance in the B. cepacia complex include decreased outer membrane permeability [9], [10], alterations to antibiotic targets [11], integrons [12], [13], and active efflux pumps [14]–[17]. Four RND (resistance-nodulation-division) efflux pumps, including RND-3, RND-4, RND-9 and RND-10, were shown to facilitate multiple antibiotic resistance in laboratory reference strains of the B. cepacia complex, whereas any contribution of these efflux pumps to resistance of clinical isolates has not been reported [14], [15], [17]. Because the contribution of various antibiotic resistance mechanisms in clinical B. cepacia complex isolates is not well understood, we investigated the roles of the class 1 and 2 integrons, the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) of topoisomerase II and IV, and active efflux pumps in 66 clinical B. cepacia complex isolates. We also differentiated the B. cepacia complex to the species level by molecular typing and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis in order to investigate the resistance mechanisms in different species.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial isolates

A total of 66 B. cepacia complex isolates were identified with the Vitek 2 system (bioMérieux) from blood (n = 45), sputum (n = 10), lung abscesses (n = 5), urine (n = 3), surgical wounds (n = 2), and pus (n = 1) between 2009 and 2011 at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, a 1,600-bed medical centre in Taiwan. Antibiotic resistant mechanisms of bacterial isolates were analysed in this study whereas the human specimens or patient's information were not included.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (KMUH-IRB-20130181). The study subjects were bacterial isolates and the informed consents were waived.

Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses and sequence of the recA gene

The genomovar typing of B. cepacia complex isolates was described by Mahenthiralingam et al. [18]. Briefly, recA PCR was performed with the primer pair consisting of BCR1 and BCR2 (Table 1), followed by HaeIII digestion of the PCR products. Species were identified based on recA-RFLP types according to previous studies [18], [19]. After identifying five recA-RFLP patterns, the complete recA gene was sequenced in two 500-bp fragments using combinations of the PCR primers BCR1, BCR2, BCR3, and BCR4 (Table 1); nucleotide sequences were compared with sequence database using the BLAST sequence algorithm (National Center for Biotechnology Information).
Table 1

Primers used in this study.

TargetPrimer nameSequence (5′ to 3′)Amplicon size (bp)Reference
int1 Int1F CGCGGCATAGACTGTAC 921 [13]
Int1R TTCGAATGTCGTAACCGC
int2 Int2F GCAAATGAAGTGCAACGC 465 [13]
Int2R ACACGCTTGCTAACGATG
sul1 sul1F CTTCGATGAGAGCCGGCGGC 437 [12]
sul1R GCAAGGCGGAAACCCGCGCC
Class I integron cassette5′CS GGCATCCAAGCAGCAAGC variable [12]
3′CS AAGCAGACTTGACCTGAT
Class II integron cassette125′CS TTTTTGTGCTGCCATATCCGTG variable [24]
23′CS TGGGCTGAGAGAGTGGT
gyrA gyrA-F ATCTCGATTACGCGATGAGC 449 [11]
gyrA-R GCCGTTGATCAGCAGGTT
parC parC-F ATTGGTCAGGGTCGTGAAGA 229 [11]
parC-R GTAGCGCAGCGAGAAATCCT
recA BCR1 TGACCGCCGAGAAGAGCAA 1043 [18]
BCR2 CTCTTCTTCGTCCATCGCCTC
recA sequencing primersBCR3 GTCGCAGGCGCTGCGCAA [18]
BCR4 GCGCAGCGCCTGCGACAT
BCAM0918 (control gene)0918F GAGATGAGCACCGATCACAC 143 [26]
0918R CCTTCGAGGAACGACTTCAG
BCAL1674 (RND-3)1674F TTGTATCGGCGGCGAATGAT 129This study
1674R CTTGTCGCCCTTTCCGCATC
BCAL2822 (RND-4)2822F GCGGTGTTCCCGAACCCGAAT 168 [25]
2822R GCTCGACCTTGTTGCTGGCGT
BCAM1947 (RND-9)1947F CGACGTCGCAGGAAGAACTC 118This study
1947R ACTTCGGTGAAGCCGAGATT
BCAM2551 (RND10)2551F AACACCGACCAGGACAAGAA 84This study
2551R CTGCATCCCTTGCTGCACTT
BCAL1672 (RND-3 regulator)1672F AGTCTACCGATGTTCCGCAAA 930This study
1672R GCCACAGGGTGCGTTTGTTA
BCAL2823 (RND-4 regulator)2823F GGGGTTGCGGACCCTATATT 855This study
2823R AATTTCGCGGCGGTGATGTC
BCAM1948 (RND-9 regulator)1948F CCGTTAAATTCGTCCGCGAG 944This study
1948R ATACGCGTTTCTTCGGCGAC
BCAM2554 (RND-10 regulator)2554F TAGAGACGCAGCACGATGTC 1419This study
2554R GGTTTACTGCGGATTCGGGA

Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) analysis

B. cepacia complex isolates were grown on blood agar and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Sample preparation and crystallisation were performed as described by Degand et al. [20]. MALDI-TOF MS was performed using a MALDI Biotyper system (Microflex LT, Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany) and a 60-Hz nitrogen laser (337 nm wavelength). Spectra were collected in the linear positive mode in the mass range of 2,000 to 20,000 m/z for bacterial identification using MALDI Biotyper software (version 3.1.66; Bruker Daltoniks GmbH, Bremen, Germany).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the standard broth microdilution method according to the guidelines of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [21]. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic that prevented bacterial growth after 20 to 24 h of incubation at 37°C. The following antimicrobial agents were tested: ceftazidime, meropenem, minocycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid, levofloxacin, and chloramphenicol.

Efflux pump activity testing

To evaluate the efflux pump activity of B. cepacia complex isolates, MIC resistance patterns were measured with the efflux pump inhibitor carbonyl cyanide-m-chlorophenyl hydrazone (CCCP; Sigma- Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) by the broth microdilution method [22]. Briefly, 100 µl of the final bacterial inoculation was adjusted to 5×105 CFU/ml in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth (CAMHB) and incubated with 100 µl of serial two-fold dilutions of antibiotics in a 96-well plate. Subsequently, 1.2 µl CCCP (10 mM in dimethyl sulfoxide [DMSO]) was added to a final concentration of 60 µM. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic that prevented bacterial growth after 20 to 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Given that 240 µM and 120 µM CCCP inhibited the growth of B. cepacia complex strains, a final concentration of 60 µM CCCP was used in this test. Presence of efflux pump activity was defined as any strain exhibiting at least a 4-fold decrease in MIC with CCCP.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

PFGE typing of DNA digested with XbaI (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) was performed in accordance with previously described methods [23]. Restriction fragments ranging from 50 to 500 kb in size were separated on a CHEF Mapper apparatus (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) for 20 h at 200 V and 14°C. The gels were then stained with ethidium bromide and photographed under UV light. Dice similarity indices were employed to construct a dendrogram of pulsotype relationships via the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) with BioNumerics software version 6.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Pulsotypes were assigned to the same clusters if they exhibited 80% similarity in the dendrogram.

PCR amplification and DNA sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted with the Pure gene DNA Isolation Kit (Gentra Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, Minn.). PCR assays were performed to amplify the full sequences of the class 1 and 2 integron cassettes (int1 and int2) (Table 1) [12], [13], [24]. To detect quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) in topoisomerase II and IV, the gyrA and parC genes were sequenced. 4 RND efflux pump regulators (BCAL1672, BCAL2823, BCAM1948, and BCAM2554) were also sequenced. Primers used for amplification of the sequences are listed in Table 1 [11]. Purified PCR amplicons were sequenced via the dideoxy chain-termination method with an automated DNA Sequencer (Perkin-Elmer ABI3700), and nucleotide sequences were compared with sequence database using the BLAST sequence algorithm (National Center for Biotechnology Information).

RNA extraction and synthesis of cDNA

Total RNA was extracted from 5 ml of log-phase cultures using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Contaminating DNA was removed with DNase I (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) digestion for 45 min at 37°C, followed by phenol-chloroform extractions, isopropanol precipitation, and resuspension of total RNA in nuclease-free water. Reverse transcription was performed with 5 µg RNA using random hexamers and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR for efflux pump (efflux pump RNA expression)

PCR reactions were performed in 96-well plates in reaction buffer containing 1× FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (Roche), 300 nM primers and 2 µl cDNA. Reactions were carried out in a ABI7000 machine following the manufacturer's protocol. Forward and reverse primers were designed using Primer-BLAST and compared to the B. cenocepacia J2315 genome to verify their specificity. The primers are listed in Table 1 [25], [26]. The non-induced efflux strain No. 30 was designated as a reference strain. Relative fold changes in the transcript level of indicated genes were normalised to the BCAM0918 gene and calculated with the 2− method. The BCAM0918 gene, which was stably expressed under antibiotics, was evaluated as an internal control [26].

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were analysed with the Chi-square test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to determine if there were differences between isolates in terms of the expression level of efflux pumps, both for isolates that did and did not exhibit resistance to antimicrobial agents. All tests were two-tailed, and a P-value of<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Species identification and molecular typing

Among 66 B. cepacia complex isolates, five different patterns were identified by recA-RFLP as the previous report [18]. Fifty-two B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates were identified as pattern G (recA sequence to be identical to B. cenocepacia J2315; accession no. AM747720). Eight B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIB) isolates were identified as pattern H (B. cenocepacia C1394; accession no. AF143783). Four B. cepacia (genomovar I) isolates identified to be one isolate of pattern D (B. cepacia ATCC 25416; accession no. AF143786) and three isolates being pattern E (B. cepacia ATCC 17759; accession no. AF143788). Two B. multivorans (genomovar II) isolates was identified as pattern C (B. multivorans C1576; accession no. AF143774) (Fig. 1). Most isolates (60/66, 90.9%) were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF analysis, whereas 5 isolates (7.6%) were mistakenly identified as different species and one isolate (1.5%) had a score lower than 1.7, which indicates an unreliable identification. An isolate that was unidentified by MALDI-TOF was B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) according to recA-RFLP analysis. In addition, four B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIB) isolates were misidentified as B. cepacia (n = 3) and B. pyrrocinia (n = 1) by MALDI-TOF analysis. One B. multivorans (genomovar II) isolate was misidentified as B. dolosa by MALDI-TOF analysis (Fig. 1). PFGE analysis revealed 30 pulsotypes, including two major pulsotypes, A (n = 15) and I (n = 12), which were all B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA). Except for ceftazidime, no difference in the other antimicrobial resistance rates was observed between isolates of the two major pulsotypes (Table S2).
Figure 1

A dendrogram of pulsotype relationships developed via the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) with BioNumerics software version 6.5 (Applied Maths).

Pulsotypes were assigned to the same clusters if they exhibited 80% similarity in the dendrogram. Species identification was performed by recA-RFLP and MALDI-TOF analysis for 66 B. cepacia complex isolates.

A dendrogram of pulsotype relationships developed via the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages (UPGMA) with BioNumerics software version 6.5 (Applied Maths).

Pulsotypes were assigned to the same clusters if they exhibited 80% similarity in the dendrogram. Species identification was performed by recA-RFLP and MALDI-TOF analysis for 66 B. cepacia complex isolates. Antimicrobial susceptibility results are presented in Table 2 and the MIC data for each isolate was supplied in file S1. The susceptibility rates for minocycline and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole among the 66 B. cepacia complex isolates were highest: 90% and 97%, respectively. The susceptibility rate for meropenem was 86% and that for levofloxacin was 80%. The non-susceptibility rate for chloramphenicol was 55% and for ceftazidime was 35%. All isolates were resistant to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid. The MIC50 for chloramphenicol and ticarcillin/clavulanic acid were 16 (intermediate) and 128/2 mg/L (resistant), respectively. The antimicrobial susceptible rates for the tested antimicrobial agents of three species are revealed in Table S1. No significant differences in those rates between species are found.
Table 2

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of 66 B. cepacia complex isolates.

AntibioticMIC (µg/ml)No. (%) of total isolates
RangeMIC50 MIC90 SIR
Chloramphenicol4–128166430 (45)15 (23)21 (32)
Ceftazidime2–12886443 (65)7 (11)16 (24)
Meropenem1–12841657 (86)0 (0)9 (14)
Levofloxacin0.25–642453 (80)7 (11)6 (9)
Minocycline0.5–642460 (90)3 (5)3 (5)
Ticarcillin/clavulanic acid≥128/2128/2≥128/20 (0)0 (0)66 (100)
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole≤0.5/9.5-4/76≤0.5/9.51/1964 (97)0 (0)2 (3)

Integron cassette analysis

Class 1 integron was identified in 18 B. cenocepacia isolates (Fig. 2). One isolate harboured the class 1 integrase (intI1) and qacF genes (quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein), which were identical to the sequences for GenBank accession number FN827339. The other 17 isolates demonstrated the typical class 1 backbone structure consisting of a 5′ conserved segment (intI1) and a 3′ conserved segment, which included the qacEΔ1 and sulfamethoxazole resistance gene (sul1). Six isolates exhibited the In0 structure (GenBank accession number: M73819.1), which is an ancestor of more complex integrons [27]. Among 11 isolates containing aminoglycoside resistant genes, 2 isolates harboured one copy of aacA4 gene, which encodes aminoglycoside 6′-N-acetyltransferase, in the class 1 integron cassette, and 7 isolates contained two copies of the aacA4 gene in the class 1 integron cassette (Fig. 2). aacA7, which encodes aminoglycoside 6′-N-acetyltransferase was found in the integrons of two isolates. Two isolates with integron containing catB3 gene, which encodes chloramphenicol acetyltransferase were resistant to chloramphenicol. The result revealed integron's role in the resistance to sulfamethoxazole, chloramphenicol, and aminoglycoside.
Figure 2

Class 1 integron cassette analysis.

Genes are shown as arrows with the direction of transcription indicated by the arrowheads. Int1: class 1 integrase, qacF: quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein, qacEΔ1: remnants of quaternary ammonium compound resistance protein, sul1: sulphonamides resistance gene, aacA4: aminoglycoside 6′-acetyltransferase, aacA7: aminoglycoside 6′-acetyltransferase, and catB3: chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

Class 1 integron cassette analysis.

Genes are shown as arrows with the direction of transcription indicated by the arrowheads. Int1: class 1 integrase, qacF: quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein, qacEΔ1: remnants of quaternary ammonium compound resistance protein, sul1: sulphonamides resistance gene, aacA4: aminoglycoside 6′-acetyltransferase, aacA7: aminoglycoside 6′-acetyltransferase, and catB3: chloramphenicol acetyltransferase.

Effect of efflux pumps on antibiotic MICs (efflux pump activity)

To understand the contribution of efflux pumps to antibiotic resistance, 42 isolates that were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agent, including ceftazidime, meropenem, minocycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, levofloxacin, and chloramphenicol, were utilised for further testing. The detailed results of efflux pump activities were revealed in File S1 (CCCP method). 78.6% isolates (33/42) demonstrated presence of efflux pump activity. The proportions of strains exhibiting efflux pump activity for various antimicrobial agents are revealed in Fig. 3. 50% of levofloxacin-resistant isolates (3/6) and 70% meropenem-resistant isolates (7/10) demonstrated efflux pump activity. Most ceftazidime-resistant (17/18, 94.4%) and chloramphenicol-resistant (16/22, 72.7%) isolates also exhibited efflux pump activity. Besides, efflux pump activity was identified in both trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole-resistant isolates in the study. The presence of efflux pump activity was significantly correlated with resistance to any of the following antimicrobial agents: ceftazidime, meropenem, and chloramphenicol (all p<0.05 according to the Mann-Whitney U test).
Figure 3

Among 42 antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates, the efficacy of efflux pumps was tested via antibiotic susceptibilities: ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem (MEM), minocycline (MI), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SxT), levofloxacin (LEVO), and chloramphenicol (C) in the presence or absence of 60 µM CCCP.

Efflux pump activity was defined as present at least 4-fold decrease of MIC in the presence of CCCP. *, p<0.05 (statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test).

Among 42 antibiotic-resistant clinical isolates, the efficacy of efflux pumps was tested via antibiotic susceptibilities: ceftazidime (CAZ), meropenem (MEM), minocycline (MI), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SxT), levofloxacin (LEVO), and chloramphenicol (C) in the presence or absence of 60 µM CCCP.

Efflux pump activity was defined as present at least 4-fold decrease of MIC in the presence of CCCP. *, p<0.05 (statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test).

Characteristics of levofloxacin-resistant mechanisms

Resistant mechanism of levofloxacin has been known via accumulation of mutations in the QRDR of topoisomerase genes and efflux pump activation [7], [11]. Among the 66 B. cepacia complex isolates, resistance to levofloxacin was identified in 6 clinical isolates. Sequence analysis determined that single-base substitutions in the QRDR regions of the gyrA gene occurred at codons 81 (Gly81Asp), 83 (Thr83Ile), and 87 (Asp87His). No mutation was found in the QRDR region of the parC gene. Besides, higher efflux pump activity was found in 50% levofloxacin- resistant isolates (3/6) and could be related to levofloxacin resistance (Table 3).
Table 3

Characteristics of QRDR mutations and efflux pump activity of six fluoroquinolone-resistant B. cepacia complex isolates.

StrainMIC of levofloxacin (µg/ml)Efflux pump activityMutation in
CCCP (−) CCCP (+) gyrA gene parC gene
No. 188noneThr83Ile (ACCATC)no amino acid change
No. 2182activityno amino acid changeno amino acid change
No. 2688noneThr83Ile (ACCATC)no amino acid change
No. 27328activityAsp87His ( GAC CAC)no amino acid change
No. 341616noneThr83Ile (ACCATC)no amino acid change
No. 52648activityGly81Asp (GGCGAC)no amino acid change

Quantitative RNA expression of RND efflux pumps (efflux pump RNA expression)

According to previous studies, four active RND pumps (RND-3, RND-4, RND-9 and RND-10) were linked to bacterial antibiotic resistance in B. cenocepacia laboratory stains; however, their contributions in clinical isolates had not been elucidated [14], [15], [17]. To understand whether these efflux pumps were expressed in clinical isolates, some representative isolates with efflux pump activity (no. 4, no. 23, and no. 27) and without efflux pump activity (no. 30, and no. 38) were selected from pulsotype (pulsotype I) and the transcript abundance of these four efflux pumps quantified by qRT-PCR (Table 4). Expression of RND-4 (BCAL2822) and RND-10 (BCAM2551) were no significant difference in these clinical isolates. High expression level of RND-3 (BCAL1674) and RND-9 (BCAM1947) were identified in all clinical isolates demonstrating efflux pump activity (Table 4).
Table 4

Quantitative RNA expression of four RND efflux systems in five selected B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates.

Efflux pump activityFold change in expressiona
BCAL1674 (RND-3)BCAL2822 (RND-4)BCAM1947 (RND-9)BCAM2551 (RND-10)
Activity
No. 47.41±0.771.44±0.653.77±0.882.02±1.25
No. 236.94±0.921.47±0.892.99±0.541.78±0.56
No. 278.54±1.311.00±0.273.47±0.730.88±0.53
Non-induced
No. 301b 1b 1b 1b
No. 380.87±0.051.09±0.220.74±0.171.34±0.11

. Fold change was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (quantitative RT-PCR).

. No. 30 was a strain with a non-induced efflux pump that was utilised as a reference strain.

. Fold change was determined by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (quantitative RT-PCR). . No. 30 was a strain with a non-induced efflux pump that was utilised as a reference strain.

Sequence analysis of regulators in RND efflux pump genes

Based on previous studies that determined that the over-expression of multidrug resistance efflux pumps was usually correlated with mutations in regulator genes in clinical Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates [28], [29], two regulator genes (RND-3, and RND-9) including their promoter regions were sequenced in the five B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates. The regulators of RND-9 demonstrated no amino acid changes when compared to B. cenocepacia J2315 (GenBank accession numbers AM747720.1). Because the regulator of RND-3 (BCAL1672) is a pseudogene in B. cenocepacia J2315, sequence analysis of the BCAL1672 gene was compared with B. cenocepacia HI2424 (GenBank accession numbers CP000458.1) [30]. For three of isolates with efflux pump activity (no. 4, no. 23 and no. 27), five nucleotide deletions (from position 264 to 268) were identified in the BCAL1672 gene (GenBank accession numbers KJ882899). The deletion of a guanine nucleotide at position 125 could result in the translational frameshifting in B. cenocepacia J2315 (Fig. 4). The five nucleotide deletions from position 264 to 268 caused protein frameshifting. These results indicated that mutations in the BCAL1672 repressor could affect RND-3 efflux pump expression in B. cenocepacia clinical isolates.
Figure 4

Comparison of the BCAL1672 gene (the first 320 bp) in B. cenocepacia isolates.

The arrow (at position 125) indicates the deletion of a guanine nucleotide in B. cenocepacia J2315. Deleted nucleotides (between positions 264 and 268) were identified in clinical isolate No. 27.

Comparison of the BCAL1672 gene (the first 320 bp) in B. cenocepacia isolates.

The arrow (at position 125) indicates the deletion of a guanine nucleotide in B. cenocepacia J2315. Deleted nucleotides (between positions 264 and 268) were identified in clinical isolate No. 27.

Correlation of BCAL1672 gene mutations with efflux pump expression in clinical B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates

To investigate the BCAL1672 gene, which is a regulator of the RND-3 efflux pump in clinical B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates, 40 isolates were included for analysis. Ten isolates were susceptible to all tested antimicrobials. Thirty isolates were resistant to at least one antimicrobial agnet (25 isolates with efflux pump activity and five isolates without the activity). The five nucleotide deletions constituted predominant mutations observed in 8 of 25 isolates with efflux pump activity (Table 5). One isolate had 12 nucleotide deletions at the end of BCAL1672 (from position 586 to 598), and six isolates harboured a Ser174Pro (TCG→CCG) variation. When the groups demonstrating efflux pump activity and without activity were compared, these three variations of BCAL1672 were statistically correlated with RND-3 efflux pump activity (Chi-square test, p<0.05). Investigation of these three mutants and antibiotic resistance in these 25 isolates with efflux pump activity found that mutation of BCAL1672 could be related to chloramphenicol (12/14; 86%), meropenem (3/5; 60%), and levofloxacin (2/3; 67%) resistance. However, only three ceftazidime resistant isolates had such mutations (3/10; 30%) (Table 6). These results indicated that mutations of the BCAL1672 gene are associated with efflux pumps activity causing antibiotic resistance whereas ceftazidime resistance could be related to other unidentified mechanisms.
Table 5

Sequence analysis of regulators for the RND-3 efflux systems in B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA).

Mutation in BCAL1672 (RND-3 regulator)a Efflux activity isolates (N = 25)Non-induced (N = 5) and all susceptible isolates (N = 10)b
264 GCGTG 268; 5-nt deletion c 80
586 GCTTCGACGCCG 598; 12 nt deletion c 10
Ala140Val (GCGGTG)10
Val153Ala (GTCGCC)1615
Ser174Pro ( TCG CCG) c 60
Ala199Thr ( GCC ACC)16
Arg208Gly ( CGA GGA)166
Arg208Gly ( CGA GGG )09
Asp215Ser ( GAC AGC)10

. Sequence compared with B. cenocepacia HI2424 (GenBank accession number: CP000458.1).

. All susceptible isolates were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibilities to CAZ, LVX, C, MEM, MI, and SXT.

. The variations in BCAL1672 that are related to RND-3 efflux pump activity are indicated in bold.

Table 6

Correlation between BCAL1672 mutants and antibiotic resistance in 25 efflux activity B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates.

Mutation in BCAL1672 (RND-3 regulator)a Antibiotic resistanceb
C (n = 14)CAZ (n = 10)MEM (n = 5)LVX (n = 3)MI (n = 1)SXT (n = 2)
264 GCGTG 268; 5-nt deletion c (n = 8)810002
586 GCTTCGACGCCG 598; 12 nt deletion c (n = 1)101100
Ser174Pro ( TCG CCG) c (n = 6)322100

. Sequence compared with B. cenocepacia HI2424 (GenBank accession number: CP000458.1).

. C = chloramphenicol, CAZ = ceftazidime, MEM = meropenem, LVX = levofloxacin, MI = minocycline, and SXT = Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

. The variations in BCAL1672 that are related to RND-3 efflux pump activity are indicated in bold.

. Sequence compared with B. cenocepacia HI2424 (GenBank accession number: CP000458.1). . All susceptible isolates were tested for their antimicrobial susceptibilities to CAZ, LVX, C, MEM, MI, and SXT. . The variations in BCAL1672 that are related to RND-3 efflux pump activity are indicated in bold. . Sequence compared with B. cenocepacia HI2424 (GenBank accession number: CP000458.1). . C = chloramphenicol, CAZ = ceftazidime, MEM = meropenem, LVX = levofloxacin, MI = minocycline, and SXT = Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole . The variations in BCAL1672 that are related to RND-3 efflux pump activity are indicated in bold.

Discussion

Most studies of the B. cepacia complex in Taiwan were reported at least ten years ago [31]–[33]. Here, we present the updated data revealing that the non-susceptibility rate for ceftazidime increased from 13.9% (a previous report in 2011) [5] to 35% (this study). All 66 isolates (100%) studies were resistant to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid and the non-susceptibility rates of chloramphenicol and ceftazidime were 55% and 35%, respectively (Table 2). The above indicated antimicrobial resistance of B. cepacia complex to cause a serious clinical concern. Seventeen of 18 ceftazidime-resistant isolates and 16 of 22 chloramphenicol-resistant isolates exhibited efflux pump activity (Fig. 3). Half of the levofloxacin-resistant isolates demonstrated efflux pump activity resulting in at least a 4-fold change in MIC. These data indicate that efflux pump activity plays an important role in causing antibiotic resistance in the B. cepacia complex. In recent decades, efflux pump activity has emerged and become a significant resistant mechanism in many species of bacteria [7], [34]. In silico analysis of the B. cenocepacia genome sequence revealed 16 putative RND efflux pumps [35], [36]. Genetic analysis indicated that 4 active RND pumps (RND-3, RND-4, RND-9 and RND-10) were correlated with antibiotic resistance in the B. cepacia complex. However, the function of the RND pumps in clinical isolates was not clearly understood [14], [15], [17]. The genes associated with the RND-3 efflux pump include a regulator gene (BCAL1672) and tripartite component genes (BCAL1674 through BCAL1676). Two studies revealed that the RND-3 efflux pump was strongly induced by chloramphenicol and correlated with the extrusion of nalidixic acid [15], [35]. Our results revealed that the RND-3 efflux pump is the most up-regulated among the RND pumps tested in clinical isolates. Quantitative RT-PCR demonstrated that mutations in BCAL1672 result in the activation of the RND-3 efflux pump. Correlation of antibiotic resistance and efflux pump activation revealed that all 14 B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates with efflux pump activity were resistant to chloramphenicol. Among them, 12 had mutations in the regulator gene BCAL1672 (Table 6). The RND-9 efflux operon (comprising BCAM1945 through BCAM1947) belongs to the HAE-1 family, which includes proteins responsible for the extrusion of aminoglycosides, ethidium bromide, fluoroquinolones and β-lactams [14], [37]. In this study, three clinical isolates exhibited increased transcriptional expression of RND-9 (BCAM1947), whereas no mutations were found in the regulator BCAM1948 or the promoter region (Table 4). Up-regulation of RND-9 efflux pump expression could be activated by an unknown transcriptional factor like the situation that the global activator MarA of E.coli that can increase the acrAB efflux pump expression [38]. The efflux pump mechanisms for cefazidime resistance in B. cenocepacia (genomovar IIIA) isolates warrant further investigation (Table 6). Among the 6 fluoroquinolone-resistant B. cepacia complex isolates, amino acid changes were found in the QRDR region of the gyrA gene, including Gly81Asp, Thr83Ile, and Asp87His. No mutation was found in the QRDR region of the parC gene (Table 3). A previous study showed that fluoroquinolone resistance was correlated to a Thr83Ile or Asp87Asn mutation in the gyrA gene [11]. The Gly81Asp and Asp87His mutations in the gyrA gene in B. cepacia complex isolates are newly reported in this study. Only a few studies have described integrons in the B. cepacia complex. Ramírez et al. described a class 2 integron that harboured a streptothricin acetyltransferase in B. cenocepacia (IIIB) [13]. Crowley et al. reported a class 1 integron containing bla OXA (β-lactamase) and aac(6′)-1a (encoded aminoglycoside 6′-N-acetyltransferase type 1b) in B. cenocepacia (III) [12]. We reported class 1 integron harbouring genes in 18 isolates (18/66, 27.3%). Only one isolate contained a class 1 integrase and the qacF gene (quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein); the other isolates harboured the typical integron structure (In0) and acquired different copy of the aacA4 gene. No class 2 integron was found. Our results indicate that the class 1 integron cassette is an important vehicle to transmit resistance to aminoglycoside, sulfamethoxazole and chloramphenicol in B. cepacia complex isolates. The recA-RFLP typing performed that B. cenocepacia (IIIA and IIIB had 52 and 8 isolates, respectively) was prevalent among B. cepacia complex isolates. Because molecular methods consume time and are costly, the more rapid and cost efficient MALDI-TOF analysis has been evaluated for species identification. Species identification accuracy was 90.9% (60/66) for MALDI-TOF analysis. This result indicated that MALDI-TOF has the potential for application in the clinical microbiology laboratory to differentiate B. cepacia complex to species level. Though two major pulsotypes were identified, PFGE analysis revealed high discrimination power and high genotypic diversity of B. cepacia complex. In summary, antibiotic resistance mechanisms, including mutation of the QRDR region of topoisomerase II, the presence of the class 1 integron, and overexpression of efflux pumps, were common in B. cepacia complex clinical isolates. Mutation of the regulator gene of the RND-3 efflux pump was a major cause of high-level efflux pump expression in clinical B. cepacia complex isolates. Given the contribution of efflux pumps to antibiotic resistance in clinical B. cepacia complex isolates, the development of antimicrobial drugs targeting efflux pumps may counteract antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in the future. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of species of 66 complex isolates. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of pulsotype A (n = 15) and I (n = 12) complex isolates. (DOCX) Click here for additional data file. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of each complex isolates, efflux pump activity testing and correlation between BCAL1672 mutants and antibiotic resistance in 25 efflux activity (genomovar IIIA) isolates. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  37 in total

1.  Class 2 integron with a novel cassette array in a Burkholderia cenocepacia isolate.

Authors:  María Soledad Ramírez; Liliana Jordá Vargas; Viviana Cagnoni; Marta Tokumoto; Daniela Centrón
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants of Burkholderia cepacia.

Authors:  C F Pope; S H Gillespie; J R Pratten; T D McHugh
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Burkholderia cepacia bacteremia: a retrospective analysis of 70 episodes.

Authors:  D C Lu; S C Chang; Y C Chen; K T Luh; C Y Lee; W C Hsieh
Journal:  J Formos Med Assoc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Endemic burkholderia cepacia bacteraemia: clinical features and antimicrobial susceptibilities of isolates.

Authors:  W L Yu; D Y Wang; C W Lin; M F Tsou
Journal:  Scand J Infect Dis       Date:  1999

5.  Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Nicolas Degand; Etienne Carbonnelle; Brunhilde Dauphin; Jean-Luc Beretti; Muriel Le Bourgeois; Isabelle Sermet-Gaudelus; Christine Segonds; Patrick Berche; Xavier Nassif; Agnès Ferroni
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Burkholderia cepacia complex bacteria: opportunistic pathogens with important natural biology.

Authors:  E Mahenthiralingam; A Baldwin; C G Dowson
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-24       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  The genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315, an epidemic pathogen of cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Matthew T G Holden; Helena M B Seth-Smith; Lisa C Crossman; Mohammed Sebaihia; Stephen D Bentley; Ana M Cerdeño-Tárraga; Nicholas R Thomson; Nathalie Bason; Michael A Quail; Sarah Sharp; Inna Cherevach; Carol Churcher; Ian Goodhead; Heidi Hauser; Nancy Holroyd; Karen Mungall; Paul Scott; Danielle Walker; Brian White; Helen Rose; Pernille Iversen; Dalila Mil-Homens; Eduardo P C Rocha; Arsenio M Fialho; Adam Baldwin; Christopher Dowson; Bart G Barrell; John R Govan; Peter Vandamme; C Anthony Hart; Eshwar Mahenthiralingam; Julian Parkhill
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Efflux unbalance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Lucie Vettoretti; Patrick Plésiat; Cédric Muller; Farid El Garch; Gilles Phan; Inna Attrée; Arnaud Ducruix; Catherine Llanes
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Efflux pump genes of the resistance-nodulation-division family in Burkholderia cenocepacia genome.

Authors:  Paola Guglierame; Maria Rosalia Pasca; Edda De Rossi; Silvia Buroni; Patrizio Arrigo; Giulia Manina; Giovanna Riccardi
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Assessment of three Resistance-Nodulation-Cell Division drug efflux transporters of Burkholderia cenocepacia in intrinsic antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Silvia Buroni; Maria R Pasca; Ronald S Flannagan; Silvia Bazzini; Anna Milano; Iris Bertani; Vittorio Venturi; Miguel A Valvano; Giovanna Riccardi
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Therapies for multidrug resistant and extensively drug-resistant non-fermenting gram-negative bacteria causing nosocomial infections: a perilous journey toward 'molecularly targeted' therapy.

Authors:  Nadim G El Chakhtoura; Elie Saade; Alina Iovleva; Mohamad Yasmin; Brigid Wilson; Federico Perez; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 2.  The challenge of efflux-mediated antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Xian-Zhi Li; Patrick Plésiat; Hiroshi Nikaido
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  The Role of Efflux and Physiological Adaptation in Biofilm Tolerance and Resistance.

Authors:  Heleen Van Acker; Tom Coenye
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Crystal structures of the Burkholderia multivorans hopanoid transporter HpnN.

Authors:  Nitin Kumar; Chih-Chia Su; Tsung-Han Chou; Abhijith Radhakrishnan; Jared A Delmar; Kanagalaghatta R Rajashankar; Edward W Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Antibiotic resistance in Burkholderia species.

Authors:  Katherine A Rhodes; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  2016-07-30       Impact factor: 18.500

6.  Conservation of Resistance-Nodulation-Cell Division Efflux Pump-Mediated Antibiotic Resistance in Burkholderia cepacia Complex and Burkholderia pseudomallei Complex Species.

Authors:  Nawarat Somprasong; Jinhee Yi; Carina M Hall; Jessica R Webb; Jason W Sahl; David M Wagner; Paul Keim; Bart J Currie; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods for Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Holly K Huse; Mark J Lee; Mandy Wootton; Susan E Sharp; Maria Traczewski; John J LiPuma; Peter Jorth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-09-15       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Effect of Carbonyl Cyanide Chlorophenylhydrazone on Intrabacterial Concentration and Antimicrobial Activity of Amphenicols against Swine Resistant Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida.

Authors:  Porjai Rattanapanadda; Hung-Chih Kuo; Shao-Kuang Chang; Lisa Ann Tell; Wei-Yau Shia; Chi-Chung Chou
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.816

9.  Efflux pump-mediated drug resistance in Burkholderia.

Authors:  Nicole L Podnecky; Katherine A Rhodes; Herbert P Schweizer
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Activity of Cysteamine against the Cystic Fibrosis Pathogen Burkholderia cepacia Complex.

Authors:  Douglas Fraser-Pitt; Derry Mercer; Emma Lovie; Jennifer Robertson; Deborah O'Neil
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.