Bülent Yılmaz1, Seyfettin Köklü1, Osman Yüksel1, Serap Arslan1. 1. Bülent Yılmaz, Seyfettin Köklü, Osman Yüksel, Serap Arslan, Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Sihhiye, 06100 Ankara,Turkey.
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic utility of beta 2 microglobulin (B2-M) levels and analyze this correlation with the activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Overall, 78 IBD patients and 30 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. We examined B2-M serum levels in 43 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, 35 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 30 control subjects, using an enzymatic method. Patients were divided into two groups according to two disease types: active and in remission. Subjects were also divided into two subgroups according to extent of the disease: left-side and pancolitis for UC and ileitis and ileocolitis for CD. All groups were compared for mean serum B2-M levels and also examined to see whether there was a correlation between serum B2-M levels and other inflammatory markers. RESULTS: The mean serum B2-M levels in the control group, UC and CD were 1.71, 2.41 and 2.24 respectively. B2-M values ≥ 1.96 mg/L had a 62% sensitivity, 76% specificity, a 79% positive predictive value, and a 58% negative predictive value for UC patients. B2-M values ≥ 1.70 mg/L had 80% sensitivity, 53% specificity, 66% positive predictive value, and 69% negative predictive value for CD patients. Mean B2-M values were significantly higher in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients than in healthy controls (UC 2.41 ± 0.87 vs 1.71 ± 0.44, P = 0.002; CD 2.24 ± 1.01 vs 1.71 ± 0.44, P = 0.033). Also, mean B2-M values were significantly higher in active disease when compared to patients in remission (UC 2.66 ± 0.92 vs 1.88 ± 0.41, P = 0.004; CD 2.50 ± 1.15 vs 1.73 ± 0.31, P = 0.033). The difference between groups (UC and CD) in terms of serum B2-M levels was statistically insignificant (2.41 ± 0.87 vs 2.24 ± 1.01, P > 0.05 respectively). CONCLUSION: Serum B2-M levels may be used as an activity parameter in IBD.
AIM: To investigate the diagnostic utility of beta 2 microglobulin (B2-M) levels and analyze this correlation with the activity of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Overall, 78 IBD patients and 30 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. We examined B2-M serum levels in 43 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, 35 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 30 control subjects, using an enzymatic method. Patients were divided into two groups according to two disease types: active and in remission. Subjects were also divided into two subgroups according to extent of the disease: left-side and pancolitis for UC and ileitis and ileocolitis for CD. All groups were compared for mean serum B2-M levels and also examined to see whether there was a correlation between serum B2-M levels and other inflammatory markers. RESULTS: The mean serum B2-M levels in the control group, UC and CD were 1.71, 2.41 and 2.24 respectively. B2-M values ≥ 1.96 mg/L had a 62% sensitivity, 76% specificity, a 79% positive predictive value, and a 58% negative predictive value for UC patients. B2-M values ≥ 1.70 mg/L had 80% sensitivity, 53% specificity, 66% positive predictive value, and 69% negative predictive value for CD patients. Mean B2-M values were significantly higher in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's diseasepatients than in healthy controls (UC 2.41 ± 0.87 vs 1.71 ± 0.44, P = 0.002; CD 2.24 ± 1.01 vs 1.71 ± 0.44, P = 0.033). Also, mean B2-M values were significantly higher in active disease when compared to patients in remission (UC 2.66 ± 0.92 vs 1.88 ± 0.41, P = 0.004; CD 2.50 ± 1.15 vs 1.73 ± 0.31, P = 0.033). The difference between groups (UC and CD) in terms of serum B2-M levels was statistically insignificant (2.41 ± 0.87 vs 2.24 ± 1.01, P > 0.05 respectively). CONCLUSION: Serum B2-M levels may be used as an activity parameter in IBD.
Authors: Mark S Silverberg; Jack Satsangi; Tariq Ahmad; Ian D R Arnott; Charles N Bernstein; Steven R Brant; Renzo Caprilli; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Christoph Gasche; Karel Geboes; Derek P Jewell; Amir Karban; Edward V Loftus; A Salvador Peña; Robert H Riddell; David B Sachar; Stefan Schreiber; A Hillary Steinhart; Stephan R Targan; Severine Vermeire; B F Warren Journal: Can J Gastroenterol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.522
Authors: Geert D'Haens; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Karel Geboes; Stephen B Hanauer; E Jan Irvine; Marc Lémann; Philippe Marteau; Paul Rutgeerts; Jurgen Schölmerich; Lloyd R Sutherland Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2006-12-20 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Craig A Solem; Edward V Loftus; William J Tremaine; William S Harmsen; Alan R Zinsmeister; William J Sandborn Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: M Zissis; A Afroudakis; G Galanopoulos; L Palermos; X Boura; S Michopoulos; A Archimandritis Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Craig Mowat; Andrew Cole; Al Windsor; Tariq Ahmad; Ian Arnott; Richard Driscoll; Sally Mitton; Tim Orchard; Matt Rutter; Lisa Younge; Charlie Lees; Gwo-Tzer Ho; Jack Satsangi; Stuart Bloom Journal: Gut Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Johannes B Scheppach; Josef Coresh; Aozhou Wu; Rebecca F Gottesman; Thomas H Mosley; David S Knopman; Morgan E Grams; A Richey Sharrett; Silvia Koton Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2020-05-16 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Michael A Hoyt; Ashley Wei-Ting Wang; Ian A Boggero; Tory A Eisenlohr-Moul; Annette L Stanton; Suzanne C Segerstrom Journal: Psychol Aging Date: 2020-04-09
Authors: Marco Colombo; Helen C Looker; Bassam Farran; Sibylle Hess; Leif Groop; Colin N A Palmer; Mary Julia Brosnan; R Neil Dalton; Max Wong; Charles Turner; Emma Ahlqvist; David Dunger; Felix Agakov; Paul Durrington; Shona Livingstone; John Betteridge; Paul M McKeigue; Helen M Colhoun Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-10-05 Impact factor: 10.122