| Literature DB >> 25151955 |
G Barosi1, A Tefferi2, C Besses3, G Birgegard4, F Cervantes5, G Finazzi6, H Gisslinger7, M Griesshammer8, C Harrison9, R Hehlmann10, S Hermouet11, J-J Kiladjian12, N Kröger13, R Mesa14, M F Mc Mullin15, A Pardanani2, F Passamonti16, J Samuelsson17, A M Vannucchi18, A Reiter10, R T Silver19, S Verstovsek20, G Tognoni21, T Barbui6.
Abstract
The discovery of somatic mutations, primarily JAK2V617F and CALR, in classic BCR-ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) has generated interest in the development of molecularly targeted therapies, whose accurate assessment requires a standardized framework. A working group, comprised of members from European LeukemiaNet (ELN) and International Working Group for MPN Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT), prepared consensus-based recommendations regarding trial design, patient selection and definition of relevant end points. Accordingly, a response able to capture the long-term effect of the drug should be selected as the end point of phase II trials aimed at developing new drugs for MPNs. A time-to-event, such as overall survival, or progression-free survival or both, as co-primary end points, should measure efficacy in phase III studies. New drugs should be tested for preventing disease progression in myelofibrosis patients with early disease in randomized studies, and a time to event, such as progression-free or event-free survival should be the primary end point. Phase III trials aimed at preventing vascular events in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia should be based on a selection of the target population based on new prognostic factors, including JAK2 mutation. In conclusion, we recommended a format for clinical trials in MPNs that facilitates communication between academic investigators, regulatory agencies and drug companies.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25151955 PMCID: PMC8764620 DOI: 10.1038/leu.2014.250
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leukemia ISSN: 0887-6924 Impact factor: 11.528