Literature DB >> 20664061

Treatment of progression of Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms to myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia by azacitidine: a report on 54 cases on the behalf of the Groupe Francophone des Myelodysplasies (GFM).

Sylvain Thepot1, Raphael Itzykson, Valerie Seegers, Emmanuel Raffoux, Bruno Quesnel, Yasmine Chait, Lucile Sorin, Francois Dreyfus, Thomas Cluzeau, Jacques Delaunay, Laurence Sanhes, Virginie Eclache, Caroline Dartigeas, Pascal Turlure, Stephanie Harel, Celia Salanoubat, Jean-Jacques Kiladjian, Pierre Fenaux, Lionel Adès.   

Abstract

Transformation of Philadelphia (Ph)-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor response to chemotherapy and short survival. Fifty-four patients with Ph-negative MPN (including 21 essential thrombocythemia [ET], 21 polycythemia vera [PV], 7 primary myelofibrosis, and 5 unclassified MPN) who had progressed to AML (n = 26) or MDS (n = 28) were treated with azacitidine in a patient-named program. Overall response rate was 52% (24% complete response [CR], 11% partial response [PR], 8% marrow CR or CR with incomplete recovery of cytopenias, 9% hematologic improvement) and median response duration was 9 months. Prognostic factors were for overall response the underlying MPN (71% vs 33% responses in ET and PV, respectively; P = .016); prognostic factors for CR achievement were the underlying MPN (14% CR for PV vs 43% for ET; P = .040) and World Health Organization classification at transformation (36% vs 12% CR in MDS and AML, respectively, P = .038). Recurrence of chronic phase features of the initial MPN was observed in 39% of the responders. Median overall survival was 11 months. Azacitidine gives encouraging results in Ph-negative MPN having progressed to AML or MDS, but response duration is short, and consolidation treatments have to be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20664061     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-03-274811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  50 in total

1.  Ruxolitinib.

Authors:  Ruben A Mesa; Uma Yasothan; Peter Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 2.  Setting Appropriate Goals for the Next Generation of Clinical Trials in Myelofibrosis.

Authors:  Giovanni Barosi
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 3.  Allo-SCT for myelofibrosis: reversing the chronic phase in the JAK inhibitor era?

Authors:  R Tamari; T I Mughal; D Rondelli; R Hasserjian; V Gupta; O Odenike; V Fauble; G Finazzi; F Pane; J Mascarenhas; J Prchal; S Giralt; R Hoffman
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.483

4.  Phase I evaluation of XL019, an oral, potent, and selective JAK2 inhibitor.

Authors:  Srdan Verstovsek; Constantine S Tam; Martha Wadleigh; Lubomir Sokol; Catherine C Smith; Lynne A Bui; Chunyan Song; Douglas O Clary; Patrycja Olszynski; Jorge Cortes; Hagop Kantarjian; Neil P Shah
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.156

5.  Safety and efficacy of combined ruxolitinib and decitabine in accelerated and blast-phase myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Authors:  Raajit K Rampal; John O Mascarenhas; Heidi E Kosiorek; Leah Price; Dmitriy Berenzon; Elizabeth Hexner; Camille N Abboud; Marina Kremyanskaya; Rona Singer Weinberg; Mohamed E Salama; Kamal Menghrajani; Vesna Najfeld; Lonette Sandy; Mark L Heaney; Ross L Levine; Ruben A Mesa; Amylou C Dueck; Judith D Goldberg; Ronald Hoffman
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-12-26

6.  Phase 2 study of the JAK kinase inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with refractory leukemias, including postmyeloproliferative neoplasm acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Alireza Eghtedar; Srdan Verstovsek; Zeev Estrov; Jan Burger; Jorge Cortes; Carol Bivins; Stefan Faderl; Alessandra Ferrajoli; Gautam Borthakur; Solly George; Peggy A Scherle; Robert C Newton; Hagop M Kantarjian; Farhad Ravandi
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Myelofibrosis 2012: it's complicated.

Authors:  Harper G Hubbeling; Dale M Frank; Elizabeth O Hexner
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2012-06

8.  Clinical use of ruxolitinib in an academic medical center in unselected patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms not on clinical study.

Authors:  Kiran Naqvi; Naval Daver; Naveen Pemmaraju; Prithviraj Bose; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jorge Cortes; Hagop M Kantarjian; Srdan Verstovsek
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-08-05

Review 9.  Leukemic Transformation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: Therapeutic and Genomic Considerations.

Authors:  Bing Li; John O Mascarenhas; Raajit K Rampal
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 10.  Myelofibrosis-When Do We Select Transplantation or Non-transplantation Therapeutic Options?

Authors:  Auro Viswabandya; Rebecca Devlin; Vikas Gupta
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.952

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.