Literature DB >> 25151590

Assessment of the effective dose in supine, prone, and oblique positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel combined extremity and maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography scanner.

J Koivisto1, J Wolff2, J Järnstedt3, P Dastidar4, M Kortesniemi5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to assess the organ and effective doses (International Commission on Radiological Protection [ICRP] 103 standard) resulting from supine, prone, and oblique phantom positions in the maxillofacial region using a novel cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) device and to compare the results with conventional dental CBCT and multislice computed tomography (MSCT) devices. STUDY
DESIGN: Measurements were performed using an anthropomorphic RANDO head phantom (Radiation Analogue Dosimetry System) with 20 MOSFET (metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor) dosimeters placed in the most radiosensitive maxillofacial organs. Effective doses were measured in 3 phantom positions using a combined extremity and maxillofacial CBCT device: the Planmed Verity CBCT scanner. Reference values were measured in the upright position with 2 CBCT devices and in the prone position with one MSCT scanner.
RESULTS: The Planmed Verity CBCT scanner effective doses were 247 μSv in supine, 192 μSv in prone, and 134 μSv in oblique position. The effective dose with ProMax 3D MAX CBCT was 168 μSv; with i-CAT Next Generation, 170 μSv; and with Philips Brilliance 64 MSCT, 781 μSv.
CONCLUSIONS: Head positioning has an important effect on the organ and effective doses. The Planmed Verity CBCT scanner effective dose results were comparable with those attained on 2 conventional CBCT devices and were considerably lower than the MSCT scanner results.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25151590     DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol


  4 in total

1.  Impact of prone, supine and oblique patient positioning on CBCT image quality, contrast-to-noise ratio and figure of merit value in the maxillofacial region.

Authors:  Juha Koivisto; Maureen van Eijnatten; Jorma Järnstedt; Kirsi Holli-Helenius; Prasun Dastidar; Jan Wolff
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  A dose-neutral image quality comparison of different CBCT and CT systems using paranasal sinus imaging protocols and phantoms.

Authors:  Ari-Petteri Ronkainen; Ali Al-Gburi; Timo Liimatainen; Hanna Matikka
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.236

3.  Characterization of MOSFET dosimeters for low-dose measurements in maxillofacial anthropomorphic phantoms.

Authors:  Juha H Koivisto; Jan E Wolff; Timo Kiljunen; Dirk Schulze; Mika Kortesniemi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  Influence of patient position and other inherent factors on image quality in two different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices.

Authors:  Ninita Lindfors; Henrik Lund; Hans Johansson; Annika Ekestubbe
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2017-11-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.